Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: Four arrested after images of Trump and Epstein projected on to Windsor Castle ahead of president's visit [View all]muriel_volestrangler
(105,320 posts)3. The government does pardons, not the monarch
although they are "in the monarch's name". The last monarch to try a pardon on his own was George IV (reigned 1820-1830), according to Wikipedia, referencing a House of Commons note:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Royal_prerogative_of_mercy
Not since the 19th century has the monarch attempted to exercise this
prerogative personally. King George IV wished to influence the Lord
Lieutenant of Ireland in exercising the prerogative of mercy in relation to a
death sentence for an inhabitant of Clare who had burned his own house
down. When Sir Robert Peel, the then Home Secretary, threatened
resignation, the King gave way. Cases of persons sentenced to death at the
Old Bailey were once considered by the monarch at a meeting of the Privy
Council. George IV often advocated mercy until over-ruled by his advisers.
https://researchbriefings.files.parliament.uk/documents/CBP-9877/CBP-9877.pdf
prerogative personally. King George IV wished to influence the Lord
Lieutenant of Ireland in exercising the prerogative of mercy in relation to a
death sentence for an inhabitant of Clare who had burned his own house
down. When Sir Robert Peel, the then Home Secretary, threatened
resignation, the King gave way. Cases of persons sentenced to death at the
Old Bailey were once considered by the monarch at a meeting of the Privy
Council. George IV often advocated mercy until over-ruled by his advisers.
https://researchbriefings.files.parliament.uk/documents/CBP-9877/CBP-9877.pdf
And the current government, though Labour, are trying to "look tough" - there's no chance they'd let anyone off if they were convicted.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
4 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
37 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Four arrested after images of Trump and Epstein projected on to Windsor Castle ahead of president's visit [View all]
muriel_volestrangler
Sep 17
OP
I can't love what they're doing nearly enough - especially the channel 4 lie debunking thing
Alice B.
Sep 17
#12
There's another thread somewhere, I think, that includes a discussion about that
Alice B.
Sep 18
#34
This one? I didn't read the whole way through to see if a viable source for US viewing was offered but this is the one..
Alice B.
Sep 18
#37
I love the Brits! From what I've heard this morning, the reason they're hiding Trump at Windsor Castle is
Vinca
Sep 17
#10
IANAL, but I'll be surprised if they can make those charges stick if it ever makes it to court
Emrys
Sep 17
#13