Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Environment & Energy

Showing Original Post only (View all)

hatrack

(63,956 posts)
Thu Nov 6, 2025, 06:49 AM Thursday

But Market Forces!!! As Emptiness Of Most Carbon Offset Programs Becomes Clear, Global Carbon Prices In Freefall [View all]

EDIT

Just two years ago, the survival of these trees – a crucial elephant habitat – was the basis of a multibillion dollar carbon boom that touched almost every large-scale forest on Earth, underpinning the environmental claims of some of the biggest companies in the world. Netflix and Shell were among the companies that bought millions of credits from Kasigau. The market reached more than $2bn (£1.5bn), propelled by a wave of enthusiasm for offsets as a solution to global heating and biodiversity loss. Each credit represented a tonne of CO2 that was not released into the atmosphere from deforestation, theoretically cancelling out emissions from flying, fashion, food and fossil fuels. During the pandemic, leading investment banks formed trading desks for offsets as prices surged from a few dollars to more than $30 a credit for some schemes.

But today, a large part of the money and enthusiasm for these schemes has dried up after a dramatic market collapse. Crucial flaws in the way credits were calculated indicated that the overwhelming majority of forest protection credits approved by Verra, the world’s leading certifier, massively overstated their impact.

In 2023, a joint Guardian investigation found that, based on analysis of a significant percentage of the projects, more than 90% of offsets did not represent genuine carbon reductions, according to independent research published by journals including Science, PNAS and Conservation Biology. Another paper, published in Science last month, reinforced the finding that there were deep flaws in the Verra system, and another is expected in the coming months. The Washington-based NGO says two of the previous studies have been “discredited” and declined to comment on the latest Science study. Fragility in the market compounded after the re-election of Donald Trump, as banks and big businesses began rolling back their green commitments.

The market downturn wiped hundreds of millions off the market – and along with it, the funding for a number of projects that actually were successfully slowing deforestation – including the handful that were stopping large amounts of forest loss. “The rumour in the community is that the project is dying because there is no money coming in,” says Agnes Kipee, 60, who lives in a village inside the Kasigau project boundaries. “Before, we were getting a lot of stipends from the carbon project. Right now, nothing is coming. We wonder what is happening,” she says.

EDIT

https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2025/nov/06/carbon-offsetting-market-collapses-what-happens-to-the-forests-they-hoped-to-protect-aoe

3 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Environment & Energy»But Market Forces!!! As ...»Reply #0