General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region Forumssaw Kornaki on MSNBC showing Harris had same polling as Biden
https://www.mediaite.com/tv/msnbcs-steve-kornacki-dismisses-kamala-doing-better-than-biden-based-more-on-hope-than-actual-polling/saw this clip of Kornaki on Andrea Mitchell maybe 1/2 hour ago.....
obamanut2012
(29,370 posts)WarGamer
(18,613 posts)A week ago, yeah she wasn't doing any better than Biden...
But with a clean fresh launch I wouldn't be surprised to see her grab a lead in the next round of polls.
obamanut2012
(29,370 posts)Last week was a gulf away from today. I agree, especially after teh convention, and if her Veep pick is Shapiro or similar.
WarGamer
(18,613 posts)And the Blue Wall will decide this thing.
Deek1935
(1,055 posts)WarGamer
(18,613 posts)has been accurate historically.
Just because Rasmussen or Gallup released crap polls doesn't mean the aggregate they dropped into wasn't accurate.
Arazi
(8,887 posts)So now we dont care about polls?
But we did when it was useful to force him out?
🤔
ecstatic
(35,075 posts)There's a lot of work to do and we are sticking with KH til the bitter end.
Bucky
(55,334 posts)Not one pol reflects on her as the actual nominee. And yet she's just 2-3 points down against America's #1 bamboozler. .
That tells me a LOT more about Trump's weaknesses than about her still-unrevealed strengths
getagrip_already
(17,802 posts)Always has been.
And polls are pointless right now (or ever).
He is just trying to satisify his pay masters.
Bucky
(55,334 posts)You just need to be smart enough to provide the right context.
Harris's numbers are based on being ignored by the press and not having one blessed day to actually campaign.
Give her time and attention and you'll see those numbers change.
Quit blaming the media for delivering unhappy news. Shooting the messenger is an act of fear. We're running a campaign of confidence and hope.
getagrip_already
(17,802 posts)That doesnt make him good at analysis. It makes him entertaining, which is his job.
Dont confuse style with substance.
Bucky
(55,334 posts)I've only observed him laying it out straight over the years. He's a score board reader, not an ally.
I'd ask you not to confuse unwelcome news with malicious intent.
getagrip_already
(17,802 posts)But i can see when someone is merely going through the motions. It isnt malicious on his part, although the network is far from innocent, and he has his bias.
I dont take it as bad news since i simply dont believe the polls. What i object to is their presentation as black and white fact.
Polls are not facts. Yet they are presented as such.
My expertise came as an asqc certified quality engineer with a specialty in design of experiments. I know not to confuse probability with fact. The media doesnt.
JohnSJ
(98,883 posts)wasnt enough data.
I think the problem with the polls is that Democratic support was under represented. Democrats polled were more concerned about Biden, and while the majority of Democrats were all on board for Biden, it represented less than 2020. That being said, I firmly believe most of those concerned Democrats on Biden, would have voted for him in November, and that was not accurately reflected in the polls.
My view is that Harris will consolidate that concerned Democratic support shortly, and that will be reflected positively for us in the polls.
The challenge will then be getting independents aboard.
Bucky
(55,334 posts)Youre right about independents being key. But the surest path to a blue win is if we get YouTube and first time voters back in the mix. That's how we've win in the past: Clinton in
'92, Obama in '08, both appealed to youth voters, both were under 50 and threw the word Hope around liberally.
Trump is rather stupidly running as an incumbent. His message is mostly about the past and getting even. People perpetually want a break from the toxic flavor Republicans always generate in politics, so I think Harris has the opening to reframe this election as building a better future.
I find this exciting. I think she is undefined enough to rebrand herself as a new politician. She's got cool stepmom vibes (which ironically, she actually is). Attacking her for dating around while she was single is gonna backfire harsh on the Republicans. They'd be basically attacking Mary Tyler Moore.
I think this is gonna be a good year for us. We just need our party leaders to handle it right.
PortTack
(35,820 posts)TwilightZone
(28,836 posts)Circumstances have changed so much that nothing before should be taken seriously.
Once people have had some time to digest the sea change and react, a comparison might be more apt.
crud
(1,257 posts)but personally, I'm a lot more hopeful today.
TwilightZone
(28,836 posts)Mz Pip
(28,457 posts)This is now.
Give it a few days. I expect her numbers to increase.
Sogo
(7,193 posts)There hasn't been enough time for a current poll since the announcement.
RANDYWILDMAN
(3,164 posts)yeah, nothing to see here...this does not reflect the actual change that just happened.
BigDemVoter
(4,700 posts)But didn't Kornacki say that Harris is polling one point better and that in itself is "significant"?
She should do quite well once the contrast with the geriatric **$$Y-Grabber is broadcast. . . Cheeto is now the oldest person to ever run for President, and this should be hammered hard (along with all of his other shit). . . .
maxsolomon
(38,739 posts)There are few undecideds remaining. They're nearly all low information voters.
Hopefully she can make an impression on these ding dongs, but she's not likely to change the sentiments of, for instance, Muslim voters in MI who are planning to sit this election out because of the Administration's policy on the Gaza War.
GoodRaisin
(10,923 posts)Its a starting point. Give it a few weeks to see significant changes. The way the Party is embracing her is the encouraging factor right now.
Zambero
(9,990 posts)Kingofalldems
(40,283 posts)JohnSJ
(98,883 posts)minimum when she becomes the official candidate she will consolidate Democratic support which will move poll numbers in our favor
It will only get better
moonscape
(5,725 posts)popular before they run, a hypotheticals. May her numbers rise.
Definitely ready for a woman, finally!
Zambero
(9,990 posts)It's FABRICATION time!
Kid Berwyn
(24,420 posts)Guy looks like a dweeb, and he acts like a dweeb, and he sounds like a dweeb, but he's also a master manipulator of spin rot.
Deek1935
(1,055 posts)Wounded Bear
(64,331 posts)Takket
(23,715 posts)Asked about Harris. Now that she is the nominee, that will change the calculus and her number will go up. In a week there should be some effect but no one is really going to have any opinion on her until after the convention.
oasis
(53,695 posts)will flow into the households of America.
FSogol
(47,623 posts)kerry-is-my-prez
(10,283 posts)The National pools can give you an idea. Dems usually win the popular vote but often struggle with the @#% electoral college.
angrychair
(12,289 posts)And are meaningless now. The script has changed dramatically since those polls were done.
1) She was a hypothetical candidate, not the actual candidate.
2) her potential support on that poll was diluted by others that have now endorsed her.
In another three weeks I fully believe those numbers will be very different.
lapfog_1
(31,904 posts)and Harris is the nominee and there is a VP pick.
The money is coming by the truckload now... the energy is waay up.
The polling will follow. Harris/X will be 4 to 6 points up in almost every swing state. We will need to keep it going all the way to November... but the repukes have lost one of their main issues of the campaign that, like or not, was hurting us... Joe's age.
Love Joe, supported him every time he ran (go back in the way back machine to 2008 and read my posts). But his age became an issue ( fairly or unfairly ). Now that issue is gone... and their third time pick is now the oldest person to ever run for President and has many mental issues that are easy to see. And Vance, which was a next gen MAGA continuation choice and NOT a choice to bring more people to the GOP or mollify the never trumpers... Vance will be a millstone around their necks with his obvious and horrible misogyny.
Sympthsical
(10,971 posts)I'd at least give it a week.
And then we'll probably get a decent convention bounce. After that settles a week or two post-convention, we should have a good sense of how we're entering the fall.
Johonny
(26,195 posts)She was statistically no different than Biden. Which before the convention probably won't mean anything. People are banking on a younger candidate closes the senate president polling gap in swing states. Which it might. Don't know.
newdayneeded
(2,493 posts)but she actually is polling slightly better than Biden vs trump.
I too believe trump is in trouble. First with an almost zero bump from his convention, and now with the excitement that is building by the hour for Kamala. I think polls are about to tip toward Kamala by at least 3 to 4 points min.
lees1975
(7,046 posts)the quality of the battleground state polling right now is low and scattered. Of course, when being used to force Biden out, those same polls were said to predict the actual number of voters who will show up in each precinct and how they will vote.
I honestly think Biden would have easily cleared the 277 electoral vote line, maybe 290 as every other indicator, including some polling data, was pointing to. Of course, Harris gets the "too old" rhetoric off the table, and with two committed male chauvinists on the GOP ticket, she will definitely increase the number of women who will get to the ballot box instead of staying home. I wouldn't have a problem with her choosing another female running mate, like Gretchen Whitmer, or AOC.
I won't be surprised if there's little change in the polling data even after the DNC. The media wouldn't want that, it would hurt their ratings, and I think there is more to it than just data being collected, if you know what I mean.
brooklynite
(96,882 posts)Bettie
(19,705 posts)on dragging her down while elevating that orange sack of crap, pretending he's anything but what he actually is, a career criminal and now convicted felon. Any awful thing you can think of, it probably describes him.
It's what our media does. 24/7.
M_Demo_M
(160 posts)Stay excited, stay united, and vote, vote, vote!
lindysalsagal
(22,920 posts)With better name recognition. Many voters don't know enough about her to have an opinion, yet.
GaYellowDawg
(5,101 posts)Polling is going to change when VP Harris's candidacy is a realistic possibility rather than just theoretical. She's also going to be much more under as spotlight and tapes of her running rings around Trump administration officials and Kavanaugh are going to juice her numbers right up. He obviously didn't take that into account.
getagrip_already
(17,802 posts)He just spits out what the editors put up for him to say.
He is there for color commentary. He does his job well, but he is not someone to rely on.
ViewObsessed
(70 posts)bucolic_frolic
(55,165 posts)Trying to emulate a nerd weather forecaster in the political realm.
Doodley
(11,918 posts)CentralMass
(16,973 posts)and saw this. On one had the polls are not it doesn't make the case for replacing Biden on the ticket. On the other hand they may not mean much at this point. Only the results in November will tell.
brush
(61,033 posts)what just developed 27 hours ago, meaning Joe Biden stepping down.
Poll number from before that mean nothing.