Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region Forums100 DU'ers a day ask "How is Trump defying a SCOTUS order?"
The answer is... he's not.
Fantastic read. Kim leans left, appears on NPR, etc...
I can think of a couple "Holiday Inn DU "lawyers" who could learn something.
Simple Politics with Kim Wehle
Note to everyone: Supreme Court rulings involving Trump need to be read and unpacked VERY carefully. The press often just runs with the headlines here, that the Supreme Court ordered Abrego Garcias release when in fact they handed Trump a mini-victory. The same thing happened last summer with the Courts criminal immunity ruling. People took the bait and reported that unofficial acts can still be prosecuted as crimes, as if there was still the possibility of accountability for Trump. But the distinction between unofficial and official acts was silly. It was a decoy. Its the misuse of official power that produces abuses like whats happening with the deportations to El Salvador. The Court knew this, but pretended it was finding middle ground.
Trump has to facilitate the return, which according to Merriam-Webster means to help bring something about, (or try). Effecuate, on the other hand, means to cause or bring about something. So, as I explained to Michel Martin on NPRs Morning Edition, the Court is basically telling the lower court to reconsider ordering the government to make sure that Abrego Garcia is actually returned and that it may be sufficient for the administration to effectively just try.
Over the weekend, the government bit back at the judge, effectively telling her too bad. DOJ lawyers took the words straight from the Supreme Courts decision: The relief sought by plaintiffs is inconsistent with the Supreme Courts instruction requiring this court to respect the presidents Article II authority to manage foreign policy.
https://kimwehle.substack.com/p/the-supreme-courts-ruling-was-not
4 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

100 DU'ers a day ask "How is Trump defying a SCOTUS order?" (Original Post)
WarGamer
Sunday
OP
Blues Heron
(6,815 posts)1. Lol
obamanut2012
(28,420 posts)2. Yes, he is
WarGamer
(16,990 posts)4. Did you read the analysis by the Law Professor, Legal Advisor to ABC?
If she's wrong, you should tell her.
Response to WarGamer (Original post)
Kingofalldems This message was self-deleted by its author.