General Discussion

bluestarone

(19,645 posts) Thu Apr 24, 2025, 02:47 PM Yesterday

Question, Why did Supreme court rule that immigrants trials need to be held in Texas? (or am i wrong about this)

So, if i'm right do ALL trials (no matter where you have been picked up by ICE) go to Texas?

11 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Question, Why did Supreme court rule that immigrants trials need to be held in Texas? (or am i wrong about this) (Original Post) bluestarone Yesterday OP

Khalil went to Louisiana underpants Yesterday #1

Venue. Raven123 Yesterday #2

So, if ICE kidnapps you in New York, your hearing will be in Texas? bluestarone Yesterday #3

Only if they move you there before you can get to court dsc Yesterday #5

I don't think that is what was said. Raven123 9 hrs ago #11

what the court ruled is that there has to be habeus corpus cases and not class action suits dsc Yesterday #4

TY, so that is for Texas immigrants only? bluestarone Yesterday #6

I think before a judge gets involved they can move them at will dsc Yesterday #7

Would be nice if the Supreme court would have ruled that immigrants CANNOT be moved to any state other than the one they bluestarone Yesterday #8

yeah that would be great dsc Yesterday #9

That rulling was for a specific cohort of detainees IbogaProject Yesterday #10

underpants

(190,079 posts)

1. Khalil went to Louisiana

Reply to bluestarone (Original post)

Thu Apr 24, 2025, 02:50 PM

Yesterday

I think it has to do with where immigration courts are located but I could be wrong

Raven123

(6,610 posts)

2. Venue.

Reply to bluestarone (Original post)

Thu Apr 24, 2025, 02:52 PM

Yesterday

They want the trial in the court where the issue arose.

bluestarone

(19,645 posts)

3. So, if ICE kidnapps you in New York, your hearing will be in Texas?

Reply to Raven123 (Reply #2)

Thu Apr 24, 2025, 02:56 PM

Yesterday

No matter what? Just trying to understand this for sure.

dsc

(52,882 posts)

5. Only if they move you there before you can get to court

Reply to bluestarone (Reply #3)

Thu Apr 24, 2025, 03:02 PM

Yesterday

Raven123

(6,610 posts)

11. I don't think that is what was said.

Reply to bluestarone (Reply #3)

Fri Apr 25, 2025, 09:23 AM

9 hrs ago

I think they want the trial in the federal jurisdiction where the apprehension occurred

dsc

(52,882 posts)

4. what the court ruled is that there has to be habeus corpus cases and not class action suits

Reply to bluestarone (Original post)

Thu Apr 24, 2025, 03:01 PM

Yesterday

and those have to be heard within the jurisdiction where the prisoner is. That is why ICE bussed the prisoners to north Texas from south Texas and tried to ship them from there.

bluestarone

(19,645 posts)

6. TY, so that is for Texas immigrants only?

Reply to dsc (Reply #4)

Thu Apr 24, 2025, 03:03 PM

Yesterday

Moving them to Texas from another state isn't allowed?

dsc

(52,882 posts)

7. I think before a judge gets involved they can move them at will

Reply to bluestarone (Reply #6)

Thu Apr 24, 2025, 03:07 PM

Yesterday

the ones at issues now certainly can't be deported I don't know if they can be moved out of that part of Texas.

bluestarone

(19,645 posts)

8. Would be nice if the Supreme court would have ruled that immigrants CANNOT be moved to any state other than the one they

Reply to dsc (Reply #4)

Thu Apr 24, 2025, 03:14 PM

Yesterday

Were detained by ICE. That's the correct ruling. It would have stopped all the bullshit happening today.

dsc

(52,882 posts)

9. yeah that would be great

Reply to bluestarone (Reply #8)

Thu Apr 24, 2025, 03:21 PM

Yesterday

I am not sure courts can rule that. A class action would be preferable.

IbogaProject

(4,293 posts)

10. That rulling was for a specific cohort of detainees

Reply to bluestarone (Original post)

Thu Apr 24, 2025, 03:39 PM

Yesterday

I'm not sure it was more broadly applicable other than stating in plain English there has to be some kind of hearing in front of a judge at the very least.

Reply to this discussion