The arrest of the judge in Milwaukee by the FBI ratchets up
the confrontation between Crumb The 1st and the judiciary. They could have had her sit for questioning in an interview, as they often do with people they suspect of something, and then if they felt they had a case they could refer it to DOJ. But instead they arrested her and are holding her. It is noted that Patel did not say they have proof against her they only "suspect" she did something.
If this doesn't wake up the judges then nothing ever will. Do not let them stall in cases, do not show any deference, do not tolerate in the slightest any games. Find them in contempt and impose immediate punishment. A court above may stay the punishment while the contempt is appealed but at least the process moves instead of languishing. Obviously if the case of 34 felonies had moved expeditiously then Crumb The 1st could have been trying to get elected from behind bars. Oh my goodness I forgot we must show deference to the known serial liar, fraud and man who committed a sex crime.
I think it is quite clear that Patel may very well arrest a judge who finds an official in contempt and moves to punish that individual. Remember that we are dealing with someone who was up to his hips in the documents case and may well have been involved in where some of those classified documents have gone. I put nothing past him including using the "back channels" for ordering violence against individuals. He is after all the person who started a foundation to funnel money to the 1/6 insurrectionists for their legal costs so it is quite clear where his loyalties are and it is clearly not with democracy and the Constitution.
= new reply since forum marked as read
