Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsMaddow Blog-It's not just Medicaid: GOP eyes possible Medicare cuts in megabill
The Republican plan was shaping up to be a political albatross. Putting Medicare funding on the table probably wont help.
Itâs not just Medicaid: GOP eyes possible Medicare cuts in megabill www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddo...
— Amazing BWCA/ Quetico ProvPk.Canoe/Backpack Wilderness Minnesota (@greatplainsgrandpa.bsky.social) 2025-06-06T15:44:22.516Z
https://www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddow-show/maddowblog/s-not-just-medicaid-gop-eyes-possible-medicare-cuts-megabill-rcna211425
But as the party tries to advance the legislation in the Senate and GOP leaders scramble to make their arithmetic work, the other part of Trumps promise from February is suddenly in doubt, too. NBC News reported:
.....At this point, some readers are probably thinking that this topic sounds vaguely familiar. After all, didn't The Washington Post already report recently on the GOP megabill and possible Medicare cuts?
The answer is yes, but the details matter. The Post highlighted the fact that the Republicans legislation would add so many trillions of dollars to the national debt that it might automatically trigger sequestration changes that would force massive Medicare cuts....
This weeks developments are qualitatively different: Were not just talking about the possibility of Medicare cuts being triggered by automatic budget constraints; rather, Republican senators are making a deliberate choice to look for Medicare savings as a way to pay for the massive tax breaks the party is eager to deliver to the wealthy......
The far-right Republican plan was already shaping up to be a political albatross for its proponents. Putting Medicare funding on the table probably wont help matters.
Looking at new ways to pay for their sprawling bill for President Donald Trumps domestic agenda, Republicans are exploring ideas to slash waste, fraud and abuse in Medicare, several senators said Thursday. And President Donald Trump has blessed the pursuit, they said.
.....At this point, some readers are probably thinking that this topic sounds vaguely familiar. After all, didn't The Washington Post already report recently on the GOP megabill and possible Medicare cuts?
The answer is yes, but the details matter. The Post highlighted the fact that the Republicans legislation would add so many trillions of dollars to the national debt that it might automatically trigger sequestration changes that would force massive Medicare cuts....
This weeks developments are qualitatively different: Were not just talking about the possibility of Medicare cuts being triggered by automatic budget constraints; rather, Republican senators are making a deliberate choice to look for Medicare savings as a way to pay for the massive tax breaks the party is eager to deliver to the wealthy......
The far-right Republican plan was already shaping up to be a political albatross for its proponents. Putting Medicare funding on the table probably wont help matters.
2 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

Maddow Blog-It's not just Medicaid: GOP eyes possible Medicare cuts in megabill (Original Post)
LetMyPeopleVote
Jun 6
OP
flamingdem
(40,552 posts)1. Articles from a few months back said Medicare would be cut
by making payments to doctors the same regardless of zipcode. So it would be a way of undermining service without directly cutting Medicare.
karynnj
(60,395 posts)2. If that's what they do I think it will mostly hurt blue states
because they are higher cost areas