General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsAnyone else pissed at Ralph Nader?
If Nader didn't mislead people about Gore and the Democratic Party, 9/11 and the Iraq War wouldn't have happened because Bush wouldn't have been elected.

3catwoman3
(26,826 posts)TommieMommy
(2,046 posts)Silent Type
(9,941 posts)FemDemERA
(513 posts)BlueKentuckyGirl
(471 posts)Per The American Presidency Project, the final count was as follows. The "others" accounted for enough votes to give Harris-Walz the majority of popular votes. Of course, it probably wouldn't have changed the Electoral College vote, which is why the Electoral College needs to go bye-bye.
Party Nominees Electoral Vote Popular Vote
Presidential Vice Presidential
Democratic Kamala Harris Tim Walz 226 42% 75,019,230 48.34%
Republican Donald J. Trump J.D. Vance 312 58% 77,303,568 49.81%
Various Others 0 0 % 2,878,359 1.85%
Last update: 12/31/2024
cab67
(3,391 posts)To us. Which is backwards.
As far as they're concerned, support by Democratic politicians for Israel is too great a sin to look at the greater whole.
Torchlight
(4,824 posts)if that Australopithecus afarensis hadn't zigged when she oughta zagged, we'd all be on easy street, sippin' beverages of choice on any one of the Outer Rim worlds. Pretty sure she voted for Warren G. Harding, too.
Aristus
(70,114 posts)The entire 21st Century in the U.S. so far has been a shitshow because of his "There's no difference between the two major political parties" jive. Even in 2000, that was jarringly untrue. If he had publicly supported Al Gore in 2000, we would have had a Democrat in office from 2001-2009. And this awful, horrible century would have been placed on a much better course, no matter what the out-of-power Republicans in that timeline threw at Al Gore.
The putrid, dribbling ass-lesions who thought they were voting for a drinking buddy instead of a President get the blame, too. I haven't forgiven or forgotten those drunken "I just want a feller I can have a beer with" dickheads; and never will.
3catwoman3
(26,826 posts)than I am.
LetMyPeopleVote
(164,513 posts)I will never forgive Nader. Rove funded Nader in 2000 and 2004 http://www.huffingtonpost.com/eric-zuesse/ralph-nader-was-indispens_b_4235065.html
Furthermore, Karl Rove and the Republican Party knew this, and so they nurtured and crucially assisted Naders campaigns, both in 2000 and in 2004. On 27 October 2000, the APs Laura Meckler headlined GOP Group To Air Pro-Nader TV Ads. She opened: Hoping to boost Ralph Nader in states where he is threatening to hurt Al Gore, a Republican group is launching TV ads featuring Nader attacking the vice president [Mr. Gore]. ... Al Gore is suffering from election year delusion if he thinks his record on the environment is anything to be proud of, Nader says [in the commercial]. An announcer interjects: Whats Al Gores real record? Nader says: Eight years of principles betrayed and promises broken. Mecklers report continued: A spokeswoman for the Green Party nominee said that his campaign had no control over what other organizations do with Naders speeches. Bushs people - the group sponsoring this particular ad happened to be the Republican Leadership Council - knew exactly what they were doing, even though the liberal suckers who voted so carelessly for Ralph Nader obviously did not. Anyone who drives a car the way those liberal fools voted, faces charges of criminal negligence, at the very least. But this time, the entire nation crashed as a result; not merely a single car.....
On July 9th, the San Francisco Chronicle headlined GOP Doners Funding Nader: Bush Supporters Give Independents Bid a Financial Lift, and reported that the Nader campaign has received a recent windfall of contributions from deep-pocketed Republicans with a history of big contributions to the party, according to an analysis of federal records. Perhaps these contributors were Ambassador Egans other friends. Mr. Egans wife was now listed among the Nader contributors. Another listed was Nijad Fares, a Houston businessman, who donated $200,000 to the Bush inaugural committee and who donated $2,000 each to the Nader effort and the Bush campaign this year. Furthermore, Ari Berman reported 7 October 2004 at the Nation, under Swift Boat Veterans for Nader, that some major right-wing funders of a Republican smear campaign against Senator John Kerrys Vietnam service contributed also $13,500 to the Nader campaign, and that the Republican Party of Michigan gathered ninety percent of Naders signatures in their state (90%!) to place Nader on the ballot so Bush could win that swing states 17 electoral votes. Clearly, the word had gone out to Bushs big contributors: Help Ralphie boy! In fact, on 15 September 2005, John DiStaso of the Manchester Union-Leader, reported that, A year ago, as the Presidential general election campaign raged in battleground state New Hampshire, consumer advocate Ralph Nader found his way onto the ballot, with the help of veteran Republican strategist David Carney and the Carney-owned Norway Hill Associates consulting firm.
It was obvious, based upon the 2000 election results, that a dollar contributed to Nader in the 2004 contest would probably be a more effective way to achieve a Bush win against Kerry in the U.S. Presidential election than were perhaps even ten dollars contributed to Bush. This was a way of peeling crucial votes off from Bushs real opponent - votes that otherwise would have gone to the Democrat. Thats why the smartest Republican money in the 2004 Presidential election was actually going to Nader, even more so than to Bush himself: these indirect Bush contributions provided by far the biggest bang for the right-wing buck.
William769
(58,952 posts)
Gore1FL
(22,489 posts)Someone running like that disqualifies themselves due to their lack-of-understanding of how our government works.
We didn't lose in 2000 because of Nader. We lost in 2000 because there was a coup.
wryter2000
(47,863 posts)And a bunch more people who are supposedly on our side. I gather Eddie Glaude is up to his old tricks. So disappointing, especially because he's brilliant.
33taw
(3,180 posts)BannonsLiver
(19,250 posts)Hes just as worthless as Garland, Comey and the Roberts court.
stillcool
(34,039 posts)Gore won. The Supreme Court gave the election to Bush, not Ralph Nader.
Thanks
leftstreet
(36,772 posts)This I didn't know
SocialDemocrat61
(4,787 posts)the Supreme Court never would have been in a position to decide the election.
Chemical Bill
(2,808 posts)purged 54,000 voters from Democratic districts we would have had a Gore runaway in Florida.
Four million nationwide were purged in 2024, BTW.
SocialDemocrat61
(4,787 posts)Two things can both be true.
Nonnia Bisnez
(90 posts)Going against conventional wisdom here could lead to sanctions.
unblock
(55,214 posts)that shrub and the felonious five stole the election for shrub. A media consortium (led by the NYTimes, I think) later went through the ballots and determined that under almost any combination of recount rules, gore won Florida and therefore the electoral college.
Shrub only won because the Supreme Court bizarrely ordered a halt to the recount and ordered Florida to certify the arbitrarily halted recount as final under the bizarre logic that more recount would violate equal protection because recounts weee don't differently in different counties (largely because they used different voting technologies in different counties, but the Supreme Court didn't find an equal protection problem with that).
Also remember that the republicans who controlled the Florida legislature had announced that they would invalidate the election, and either certify the shrub electors by an act of the legislature or send no electors, throwing the election into the house
Also remember that republicans in the house had announced that they would invalidate any gore electors from Florida, and either way the election got thrown into the house, they would elect shrub.
The fix was in, one way or another.
I disagree with nader's strategy of running in the first place, but I m really not sure things would have played out differently.
And even if we did get gore , who's to say we wouldn't have had had shrub for 8 years anyway, just delayed? One thing for sure, with hate radio and foxnews unopposed, we'd have continued down this road to fascism regardless.
BootinUp
(49,927 posts)
JustABozoOnThisBus
(24,171 posts)But I don't think he really caused 9/11.
And how the hell did Eisenhower defeat Adlai Stevenson?
Polybius
(20,166 posts)Probably the last good Republican President.
JustABozoOnThisBus
(24,171 posts)Ike did give us the Interstate Highway System, so there's that. Such a thing would never make it through today's Congress.
I guess I don't see the value in re-arguing "ancient" presidential election outcomes. We need to find new means of communication and new candidates to get post-Trump MAGAs out of the White House.
MIButterfly
(573 posts)The last good Republican was Eisenhower.
marybourg
(13,455 posts)even among Democrats. Stevenson was a liberal and an intellectual
czarjak
(12,933 posts)At least according to my Jim Crow heritage. Integrating public schools was a bridge too far. The Civil Rights Act & Voting Rights Act were the final nails in the coffin. That's why poor Southern Democrats turned Republican. Racism. The Order Of The Day
wolfie001
(5,260 posts)They've really come far, those poor white folk.
wolfie001
(5,260 posts)
Chemical Bill
(2,808 posts)But he made sure that funding for the Internet was passed by Congress.
Polybius
(20,166 posts)Hard to say. We may have still gotten Trump in 2016 though.
markodochartaigh
(3,011 posts)that at this point in US history as democracy itself is in danger the Democratic party needs to maintain formation in our circular firing squad; I don't understand why Nader is to be blamed for Republicans in Florida paying a private company to disenfranchise thousands of mostly Black voters, for the Brooks Brothers riot, or for the supreme court stopping the vote count to choose the president.
https://www.thenation.com/article/archive/how-the-2000-election-in-florida-led-to-a-new-wave-of-voter-disenfranchisement/
ImNotGod
(729 posts)He also promised to not campaign in swing states like Florida (at that time). He lied about that too.
John1956PA
(4,140 posts)Maher said of G. W. Bush, "You suck." And then he said, "Gore, you're just as bad."
No one knows how many, if any, would-be Gore voters in Florida decided to vote for Nader because of remarks like Maher's. It could be that Dems and Independents who soured on Gore would have simply stayed home rather than casting their protest votes for Nader.
MIButterfly
(573 posts)Last edited Tue Jun 10, 2025, 03:01 PM - Edit history (1)
BEGGED Ralph Nader not to run again. Maybe it was in 2004, after Dubya's first term?
betsuni
(27,985 posts)Seems enough people learned the lesson for the 2020 election but are forgetting.
wolfie001
(5,260 posts)"I don't even have to show up." times about 10 million people.
Klarkashton
(3,563 posts)Try and give it a listen.
It's where RFK Jr gets all his conspiracy ideas.
Nigrum Cattus
(616 posts)Stop talking about what coulda happened.
We need to focus on the repug enemy only !
lapfog_1
(30,961 posts)for that "We didn't start the fire" bullshit.
I understand he is too.
twodogsbarking
(13,928 posts)Shrek
(4,265 posts)Nader didn't force anyone to vote for him.
LisaM
(29,240 posts)And the Green Party, because they ran him against one of the greenest candidates of all time.
Response to Renew Deal (Original post)
Post removed
leftstreet
(36,772 posts)synni
(377 posts)His hysteria about the Corvair was ridiculous, considering how many other more dangerous cars have been on the road.
UnderThisLaw
(330 posts)After hearing so much about Naders book, I found it and read it. Only one chapter directly dealt with the corvair. I always found the misunderstanding about that to border on hysteria
Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin
(124,299 posts)The last I heard of him he was at a Cisco Systems shareholder meeting complaining his dividend was too low.
Remember how both parties were the same?
Remember that pesky 9/11 event that was probably completely preventable?
Remember how Donald Trump wanted to rebuild the WTC in gold facade, just 1 story higher?
Sigh.
MineralMan
(149,215 posts)What an asshole!
Cirsium
(2,628 posts)Nader only drew 24,000 Democrats to his cause, yet 308,000 Democrats voted for Bush. Hello. If Gore had taken even 1 percent of these Democrats from Bush, Nader's votes wouldn't have mattered. Second, liberals. Sheesh. Gore lost 191,000 self-described liberals to Bush, compared to less than 34,000 who voted for Nader.
...
Some liberals noted that Bush actually has proposed less of an increase in the Pentagon's already-bloated budget than Gore did, and some were so angered by the vice president's atrocious record of selling out working families, environmentalists and farmers that they wanted to give him the double-whammy of taking a vote from him and giving it to Bush. In any event, Gore failed to close the deal with these voters -- a fact that has nothing to do with Nader.
There are plenty of other points that can be made about Gore's loss, including the fact that if he'd carried his own state of Tennessee (where Nader was not a factor), all of this would be moot. But the real need is for progressives (whether Gore-backers, Naderites or neither) to get beyond this presidential election and get down to the real business of building a long-term, grass-roots movement that taps into the latent power of more than 100 million discarded voters. If we succeed at that, we can produce a historic political realignment, creating both politics that people can be proud of and a country with a bright, democratic future.
https://www.salon.com/2000/11/28/hightower/
jls4561
(2,415 posts)The part of me that likes the idea of subverting the dominant paradigm said Nader, but the part of me that asks who could run the country better definitely went for Gore. I voted for Gore.
During the 2016 election, I voted for Pete Buttigieg in the primary. I loved the idea of voting for a woman, and odds were that Hillary would win the primary, but I voted for Pete because he just seemed so damn competent. I love to vote for him again.
Pris
(130 posts)1. The 1995 fourth world conference on women (the White House was reluctant to have her attend) Hillary the First Lady, spoke about women's rights. She said that Women's Rights Are Human Rights which reframed the conference and emboldened women to return to their home countries and fight.
2. She established the President's Interagency Council on Women in 1995
3. Introduced the phrase "sex trafficking" to the world (it had only been used once by the World Bank) after her conference she and Albright had organized about women in leadership in Austria. Multiple women came to them and said girls were disappearing in villages. Clinton put the weight of the First Lady's office around the topic and what we know of trafficking today has its roots in her work:
https://1997-2001.state.gov/statements/1998/980311.html
4. She had strong influence on the nomination of Ruth Bader Ginsburg for SCOTUS
5. She helped create SCHIP for children: 2007: Sen. Edward M. Kennedy: The childrens health program wouldnt be in existence today if we didnt have Hillary pushing for it from the other end of Pennsylvania Avenue. [The Washington Post, 10/5/07]
6. She fought for Lily Ledbetter as a key person which led to the Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Restoration Act.Ledbetter endorsed Hillary when she ran for president.
https://www.plannedparenthoodaction.org/pressroom/fact-check-hillary-clinton-has-been-champion-for-women-and-families-for-decades
https://www.hillaryclinton.com/issues/womens-rights-and-opportunity/
BootinUp
(49,927 posts)mahatmakanejeeves
(64,934 posts)Pris
(130 posts)His words hurt Gore, for sure.
NNadir
(36,000 posts)...out of drinking water.
Is he still alive?
I do believe he said that if nuclear power wasn't banned by 1990 - I think it was that year - there would be a revolution, or something like that.
I always thought Jack T. Ripper was a Nader kind of guy.
I confess about two years ago, a seatbelt and air bag saved my life. Of course, the war in Iraq, which killed more than 100,000 Iraqis is on his hands, as is the destruction of the planetary atmosphere, but all that's trivial if you realize that Al Gore would have appointed John Roberts and Sammy Alito to the Supreme Court, who have served so well at declaring the Constitution of the United States unconstitutional, you kind of understand that Nader understood things perfectly.
Other than those minor points, the seat belt and air bag did save my life.
To steal a line very popular here every morning, but to redirect it:
Is he dead yet?
Autumn
(47,942 posts)Response to Renew Deal (Original post)
Name removed Message auto-removed
GP6971
(35,175 posts)Torchlight
(4,824 posts)I'm certain it's serious. Good luck!
Ping Tung
(2,602 posts)a bolt cutter and profanity to open.
Chemical Bill
(2,808 posts)Wednesdays
(20,537 posts)If only he had fought a little harder, Democrats would have won the White House in 1876.
Response to Renew Deal (Original post)
Post removed
rubbersole
(9,912 posts)Caging, voter suppression, Jeb!, the Supreme Court and all the general voting ratfuckery in Florida...W was going to 'win' here come hell or high water. And he did.
PS - Kerry won Ohio while we're at it...
jg10003
(1,037 posts)Trashed Gore. All that nonsense about inventing the internet, discovering Love Canal, Love Story, etc.
Fiendish Thingy
(19,511 posts)There were other factors far more significant in that election.
H2O Man
(76,907 posts)Nader played no more of a role than did Buchanan.
Pinback
(13,240 posts)There were several left/progressive presidential candidates on the 2000 Florida ballot who got more than 537 votes, so you might as well blame any or all of them. But blaming Nader is so convenient and emotionally satisfying. And it lets Gore/Lieberman off the hook.
Post 42 in this thread pretty much sums up my view of the situation.
Warpy
(113,521 posts)or their candidates.
I've saved my fury for Jeb Bush, who refused the full state recount that would have shown Gore to have won the state very narrowly (see the newspaper consortium recount that happened months later), the Brooks Brothers riot of suited up Republican congressional staffers that stopped the recount in Dade County, and the USSC, which prevented any question over a highly questionable set of numbers out of state governed by the candidates fucking BRIOTHER.
Nader didn't cost Gore anything. Nader's votes were never Gore's votes. Without Nader to vote for, his voters would likely have stayed home. Stop misplacing your anger and put it where it belongs: on a corrupt family belonging to a corrupt political party, the latter now the worst threat this country has ever faced.