Death threat against Gov Gavin Newsom by Speaker Mike Johnson: "he should be tarred and feathered".

[Augiedog]

Tarring and feathering almost always led to death of the victims. It was a heinous act and meant to scare future acts of a similar nature by witnesses.

It will not come as a surprise that an idiotic, alleged ‘Christian’, thinks murder is the appropriate solution for resolving political differences.

But nonetheless it is a death threat. Wonder who will arrest the misbegotten Mike Johnson? Will he be charged with terroristic threats? Is he engaging in an insurrection himself? Seems to me that a court should be determining these issues.

[Klarkashton]

1. Mr Peepers is sure getting feisty isn't he?

Trump's little bitch on a leash is like a constipated Chihuahua.

[yorkster]

5. Right. Mr.Peepers with a bit of Uriah Heep.

[newdeal2]

2. Congress and media: demand an apology ASAP, all day today

He is threatening a sitting governor.

[senseandsensibility]

4. Absolutely

But this will be downplayed if it is even mentioned at all.

[Celerity]

3. 'Tarring and feathering almost always led to death of the victims.' This is a false claim.

5 Myths of Tarring and Feathering

https://allthingsliberty.com/2013/12/5-myths-tarring-feathering/

1. Myth:

Tarring and feathering could be fatal.

Busted:

The notion that hot tar caused severe, sometimes fatal burns is based on the assumption that “tar” meant the asphalt we use on roads, which is typically stored in liquid state at about 300°F (150°C). But in the eighteenth century “tar” meant pine tar, used for several purposes in building and maintaining ships. As any baseball fan knows, pine tar doesn’t have to be very hot to be sticky. Shipyards did warm that tar to make it flow more easily, but pine tar starts to melt at about 140°F (60°C). That’s well above the ideal for bathwater, but far from the temperature of hot asphalt.

Pine tar could be hot enough to injure someone. The Loyalist judge Peter Oliver complained that when a mob attacked Dr. Abner Beebe of Connecticut, “hot Pitch was poured upon him, which blistered his Skin.” [ i ] But other victims of tarring and feathering didn’t mention severe or lasting burns among their injuries. Rioters probably applied the tar with a mop or brush, lowering its temperature. Sometimes they tarred people more gently over their clothing.

The most vicious tar-and-feathers attack in Revolutionary America was carried out on a Comptroller for the Customs Service named John Malcolm in Boston on 25 January 1774. Malcolm was not only stripped and covered with tar and feathers but, a Customs Commissioner wrote, he was also “punched wth. a long pole, beaten with Clubs, led to liberty tree, there whipt with Cords, and tho’ a very cold night, led on to the Gallows, then whipt again.”[ii] That official’s sister added, “They say his flesh comes off his back in Stakes.”[iii] As proof of his suffering Malcolm sailed for London with scraps of skin that had fallen off his body, some with tar and feathers still attached. It’s notable, however, that Malcolm made that voyage because he didn’t die. The victim of America’s worst pre-Revolutionary assault with tar and feathers lived for another fourteen years in England.[iv]

Tarring and feathering undoubtedly caused pain and a lot of discomfort and inconvenience. But above all it was supposed to be embarrassing for the victim. Mobs performed the act in public as a humiliation and a warning—to the victim and anyone else—not to arouse the community again. There are no examples of people in Revolutionary America dying from being tarred and feathered.