Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsSo, Trump weakens his own Intelligence Agency, then ignores their opinions and research, but
takes Netanyahu's word that there are nuclear weapon sites in Iran.
Let me get this straight. A sitting US president took the word of a foreign leader to commit our troops to an aerial attack and unless someone can figure out how to reel him in, we're probably going to war.
Is this what everyone else is seeing?
4 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

So, Trump weakens his own Intelligence Agency, then ignores their opinions and research, but (Original Post)
Baitball Blogger
Jun 21
OP
RockRaven
(17,620 posts)1. Not just Bibi... Also RW talk radio and cable news babblers.
Baitball Blogger
(50,443 posts)2. I thought the right didn't want to start another war?
RockRaven
(17,620 posts)4. The right is divided on this. There is definitely a faction of warmongers,
of a couple of different religious persuasions with somewhat different motives, and some of those people are media figures who speak to Warmonger Trump (both literally and figuratively). So whatever Bibi says to Warmonger Trump is also getting reinforced by his media diet.
ImNotGod
(854 posts)3. Moscow Tulsi was against it before she wasn't. nt