Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
53 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
*** Breaking ***Verdict Reached In Diddy Case. Guilty On Lesser Charges. (Original Post) DemocratSinceBirth Jul 2 OP
The media will pay more attention to the verdict than they will Tribetime Jul 2 #1
Watching the fall of this creep as entertainment, unfortunately this MEDIA guided since I have no power on that front. Brainfodder Jul 2 #5
Guilty on two out of five charges Emile Jul 2 #2
You can't spell, murielm99 Jul 2 #3
to whom are you replying? WhiteTara Jul 2 #29
Original post. murielm99 Jul 2 #37
what was the misspelling? WhiteTara Jul 2 #42
I don't want to embarrass them. murielm99 Jul 2 #45
SMH DemocratSinceBirth Jul 2 #46
In DemocratSinceBirth Jul 2 #47
All is forgiven WhiteTara Jul 2 #48
Thank you. DemocratSinceBirth Jul 2 #50
forgiveness is mine WhiteTara Jul 2 #51
Link Passages Jul 2 #4
He can still have freaky sex parties in prison milestogo Jul 2 #6
looks like his lifestyle will carry on, outside prison. WhiteTara Jul 2 #49
Convicted on 2 counts Acquitted on 3 Johnny2X2X Jul 2 #7
Not Guilty on Sex Trafficking of Casandra Ventura Prairie Gates Jul 2 #8
Obviously it pays to be rich Arazi Jul 2 #9
Exactly. I suspect a less privileged person of color Heidi Jul 2 #11
Highly unlikely. A less privileged person of color would almost certainly never have been charged with Racketeering Wiz Imp Jul 2 #13
Maybe because they couldn't afford to boss a group of 'assistants' Sparkly Jul 2 #14
By all accounts, they didn't convince anybody in the courtroom including the Jury that there was Wiz Imp Jul 2 #16
And that is a shame. Sparkly Jul 2 #18
Combs is a truly horrible, despicable human being. Wiz Imp Jul 2 #23
And OJ was never going to be convicted Sparkly Jul 2 #28
First result of a very quick Google search; Heidi Jul 2 #17
I didn't claim otherwise. Wiz Imp Jul 2 #20
I apologize for misunderstanding. Heidi Jul 2 #22
The evidence was in front of our eyes. Sparkly Jul 2 #27
And, people still don't believe women. Sparkly Jul 2 #12
And there are specific subsets of women Heidi Jul 2 #19
Billionaire justice TheProle Jul 2 #31
Doesn't look like he's going to prison BannonsLiver Jul 2 #10
He may get off with time served. murielm99 Jul 2 #21
What's more disgusting: 1st time offense; celebrity break; richie rich "justice"? UTUSN Jul 2 #15
Guilty on two counts... OmegaX Jul 2 #24
It was a terrible decision. Sparkly Jul 2 #26
Granted... OmegaX Jul 2 #30
Blame the prosecution MakeThemCry Jul 2 #34
Question? Was there some offense lesser than Sex Trafficking that they could have charged him with Wiz Imp Jul 2 #36
The facts did speak for themselves Sparkly Jul 2 #38
Why does it seem angrychair Jul 2 #40
Good question. Sparkly Jul 2 #44
He should get zero jail time Buckeyeblue Jul 2 #25
Apparently... TheProle Jul 2 #32
Yep angrychair Jul 2 #41
But he wasn't convicted of that Buckeyeblue Jul 2 #52
Exactly my point angrychair Jul 3 #53
Yep MakeThemCry Jul 2 #33
I just heard a point which I had forgotten about - but I think is dead on. Wiz Imp Jul 2 #35
And put him on staff MorbidButterflyTat Jul 2 #43
Don't worry. moondust Jul 2 #39

Tribetime

(6,707 posts)
1. The media will pay more attention to the verdict than they will
Wed Jul 2, 2025, 10:19 AM
Jul 2

Tens of millions of people losing their health , care and dying

Brainfodder

(7,519 posts)
5. Watching the fall of this creep as entertainment, unfortunately this MEDIA guided since I have no power on that front.
Wed Jul 2, 2025, 10:25 AM
Jul 2

I do wonder why Fox News, the locations where the poison is created, doesn't experience more issues of the negative kind a lot more often?

murielm99

(32,124 posts)
37. Original post.
Wed Jul 2, 2025, 03:21 PM
Jul 2

I thought it was some sort of snark. It seemed too soon for a verdict. And the spelling was wrong. So I am the one guilty of snark.

WhiteTara

(30,939 posts)
42. what was the misspelling?
Wed Jul 2, 2025, 05:40 PM
Jul 2

they must have cleaned it up by the time I got there.

But the verdict made me sick to my stomach.

murielm99

(32,124 posts)
45. I don't want to embarrass them.
Wed Jul 2, 2025, 07:05 PM
Jul 2

I will tell you privately. The verdict made me sick, too. It should make any woman sick.

DemocratSinceBirth

(101,042 posts)
46. SMH
Wed Jul 2, 2025, 07:22 PM
Jul 2

I added an l to moral because this board sticks. I can get a glass of water in the time it takes for my thread to appear. I'm pretty sure I can spell moral. It's pretty rude to imply I can't spell a word we learn how to spell in grade school. I will be the bigger poster, take the high road, and not respond in kind.

DemocratSinceBirth

(101,042 posts)
47. In
Wed Jul 2, 2025, 08:36 PM
Jul 2

In between my haste to break the news and this board sticking, especially when starting threads, I added an l to moral. Mea culpa. Maybe I should commit seppuku.

Prairie Gates

(5,645 posts)
8. Not Guilty on Sex Trafficking of Casandra Ventura
Wed Jul 2, 2025, 10:30 AM
Jul 2


The Racketeering Conspiracy was always an overreach charge.

Heidi

(58,356 posts)
11. Exactly. I suspect a less privileged person of color
Wed Jul 2, 2025, 10:46 AM
Jul 2

(even if innocent) would have been found guilty on all counts.

Wiz Imp

(5,968 posts)
13. Highly unlikely. A less privileged person of color would almost certainly never have been charged with Racketeering
Wed Jul 2, 2025, 11:01 AM
Jul 2

and Sex Trafficking. Classic case of over charging and I think they did it to make an example of a famous person that everyone already knew was a scumbag. They thought that would be enough to get the charges to stick.

Sparkly

(24,694 posts)
14. Maybe because they couldn't afford to boss a group of 'assistants'
Wed Jul 2, 2025, 11:04 AM
Jul 2

in a pattern of criminal activity. I don't think it was overcharging at all.

Wiz Imp

(5,968 posts)
16. By all accounts, they didn't convince anybody in the courtroom including the Jury that there was
Wed Jul 2, 2025, 11:11 AM
Jul 2

any proof of sex trafficking and racketeering. That's the very definition of over charging. They never had a chance of getting guilty verdicts on those charges. The very short deliberation time makes it obvious that the jury didn't buy any of what the prosecution was selling on those charges.

Sparkly

(24,694 posts)
18. And that is a shame.
Wed Jul 2, 2025, 11:17 AM
Jul 2

Because it's clear there were force, fraud, and coercion as well as trafficking, with multiple witnesses and video evidence, and the fact that others were involved makes it racketeering.

Wiz Imp

(5,968 posts)
23. Combs is a truly horrible, despicable human being.
Wed Jul 2, 2025, 11:32 AM
Jul 2

I wish he could be sent to jail for life, but unfortunately it was never going to happen in this case.

Sparkly

(24,694 posts)
28. And OJ was never going to be convicted
Wed Jul 2, 2025, 01:01 PM
Jul 2

and Trump was never going to be convicted in the Senate and a thousand other men were never going to be convicted so "oh well!"

Heidi

(58,356 posts)
17. First result of a very quick Google search;
Wed Jul 2, 2025, 11:14 AM
Jul 2
https://archives.fbi.gov/archives/sandiego/press-releases/2014/north-park-gang-members-indicted-in-racketeering-conspiracy

Maybe they were guilty, maybe they weren’t, but POC with less privilege than Sean Combs certainly *are* charged with racketeering.

Wiz Imp

(5,968 posts)
20. I didn't claim otherwise.
Wed Jul 2, 2025, 11:22 AM
Jul 2

But based on all the accounts I've seen, based on the evidence presented, there was never any chance of getting a conviction on those charges.

Make no mistake, I wish they could put him in jail for life but it was never going to happen in this case.

Heidi

(58,356 posts)
22. I apologize for misunderstanding.
Wed Jul 2, 2025, 11:29 AM
Jul 2

I’m hot, pissed at the current state of our nation, and simultaneously navigating the whims of our two Maine Coons (one a polydactyl kitten who recently discovered that vertical liftoff is his super power).

Sparkly

(24,694 posts)
27. The evidence was in front of our eyes.
Wed Jul 2, 2025, 12:59 PM
Jul 2

All the evidence for trafficking was there, and the accomplices made it racketeering. The violence, threats of exposure of videos, financial coercion and shake-downs were all coercive. Paying for security video as a cover-up, bringing drugs and prostitutes in, sequestering his victims, threatening witnesses -- it was all there.

Heidi

(58,356 posts)
19. And there are specific subsets of women
Wed Jul 2, 2025, 11:18 AM
Jul 2

who are especially not believed. 🤬😡🥺😢✊🏾

BannonsLiver

(19,395 posts)
10. Doesn't look like he's going to prison
Wed Jul 2, 2025, 10:37 AM
Jul 2

And if he does it will be for far less time than it would have been had he been convicted on the more serious charges.

OmegaX

(15 posts)
24. Guilty on two counts...
Wed Jul 2, 2025, 11:49 AM
Jul 2

...each of which carries a 10-year maximum. As a first-time offender, he's likely to get no more than a 2-3 year sentence for each, to run concurrently and with credit for 10 months already served, he'll probably be out in 18 months, if that.

A very diverse cross-section of 12 New Yorkers listened to all the evidence and arrived at 5 separate unanimous verdicts so like it or not, their decisions should be respected; win some, lose some, that's the way it goes...

Sparkly

(24,694 posts)
26. It was a terrible decision.
Wed Jul 2, 2025, 12:52 PM
Jul 2

Win some, lose some, and sometimes the jury doesn't know what they're doing. I honestly think the defense succeeds in confusing them.

OmegaX

(15 posts)
30. Granted...
Wed Jul 2, 2025, 01:10 PM
Jul 2

...but it's the defense's job to "confuse" juries sufficiently enough for them to find enough reasonable doubt to render a verdict of not guilty. As the saying goes, "don't hate the player, hate the game"...

MakeThemCry

(11 posts)
34. Blame the prosecution
Wed Jul 2, 2025, 01:47 PM
Jul 2

They clearly overcharge him. Clearly.

They started off doing nonsense, political theater.

The jurors saw all the evidence and came to the logical conclussion that Puffy was not guilty of what they were charging him with.

I hope they learn from this and don't seek to demonize a perp like this and let the facts speak for themselves.

Wiz Imp

(5,968 posts)
36. Question? Was there some offense lesser than Sex Trafficking that they could have charged him with
Wed Jul 2, 2025, 03:16 PM
Jul 2

(beyond the transportation for prostitution charges which got guilty verdicts) but the prosecution chose not to because they went for the more serious charge? I am not remotely familiar with the the legalities or illegalities of the kind of activities He was into.

Sparkly

(24,694 posts)
44. Good question.
Wed Jul 2, 2025, 06:18 PM
Jul 2

Is the operative word the "billionaire," or the "men?"

They overlap so greatly, especially in cases like this, so...

I think it's about the "men." That seems to be the basis for decisions, and the takeaway message for the rest of society.

Buckeyeblue

(5,961 posts)
25. He should get zero jail time
Wed Jul 2, 2025, 12:29 PM
Jul 2

He's not a good person. He treated women he was in a relationship with horribly. No defense.

But that's not what he was convicted of. Prostitution. Really?

If the feds had put half the effort into holding Trump accountable as they have trying to convict Combs of a half-baked RICO charge, I don't think we would be in this mess.

I realize there is no internal link between these two cases but I'm not in the mood to debate logically this morning.

angrychair

(10,858 posts)
41. Yep
Wed Jul 2, 2025, 05:31 PM
Jul 2

As long as you completely ignore the multiple stories of sex abuse torture parties and conspiracy to hide, it's an easy case to win.

angrychair

(10,858 posts)
53. Exactly my point
Thu Jul 3, 2025, 01:19 AM
Jul 3

OJ was never convicted of murder but there is no doubt he did it or at the very least was involved.

Wiz Imp

(5,968 posts)
35. I just heard a point which I had forgotten about - but I think is dead on.
Wed Jul 2, 2025, 03:05 PM
Jul 2

Ultimately, the verdict in this case was likely irrelevant because Donald Trump is almost certainly going to pardon him.

moondust

(20,936 posts)
39. Don't worry.
Wed Jul 2, 2025, 04:49 PM
Jul 2

He'll still be a convicted "celebrity" felon with sexual charges so he'll still be qualified to replace the current "celebrity" felon at the top of the GQP ticket.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»*** Breaking ***Verdict R...