General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region Forums
ret5hd
(21,615 posts)Ocelot II
(126,094 posts)to help them by making sure they have enough food, housing, education, etc., the answer to that question is pretty obvious: Those slutty sex-having women are to be punished for their immoral sluttiness (notwithstanding the obvious involvement of men) by having to give birth to and support their babies with no help from anyone.
Irish_Dem
(72,509 posts)GOP does not care about babies or children.
jmbar2
(7,075 posts)AllaN01Bear
(26,525 posts)Jeebo
(2,486 posts)The only time sex is allowed is within marriage, with the lights off, under the covers, and only ONCE for each child you're going to have, and even then, you're NEVER allowed to enjoy it. That's the puritanical culture I was brought up in. Those were the kinds of attitudes I had growing up, until I started coming to my senses in early adulthood. Inevitably, of course, if they can't keep people from having sex, they want to burden it with all kinds of onerous consequences, and that would be what y'all are calling punishment.
Ron
SheltieLover
(71,851 posts)
newdeal2
(3,422 posts)There needs to be some form of punishment for the woman
Ping Tung
(3,068 posts)Skittles
(166,108 posts)a fucking PERVERT
csusan
(49 posts)I escorted at a reproductive health clinic in my town til it closed. Got in a discussion with a forced birther protester. I suggested we discuss together ways to decrease abortion like free birth control. His response was "NO! Then they will have sex whenever they want." I think that answers the question.
allegorical oracle
(5,388 posts)time they're passing laws that make pregnancy more dangerous than it's been in 60 years. That would suggest that they don't respect women very much.
Bettie
(18,590 posts)punishing the children as well, since there will be no Medicaid, no Public Schools, no SNAP....it's their utopia, lots of suffering, while they roll around in piles of cash or count their crypto....however one would do that.
DFW
(58,514 posts)It was not about abolishing the death penalty or vegetarians preventing animals from being raised and slaughtered for human consumption. So, NOT "pro-life." It was only about controlling women and preventing them from having abortions if they wanted (or even needed) them. "Pro-life" extremists have not been reluctant to call for the death penalty for women who have abortions, and they sometimes have not even held back in murdering physicians who perform the procedure. The only ones among them who are credibly "pro-Life" are the ones who are advocates of a certain brand of Quaker Oats cereal.
Hekate
(98,594 posts)Solly Mack
(95,295 posts)RoeVWade
(566 posts)It's definitely proven you can't rest where your rights are concerned.
BigmanPigman
(53,370 posts)Hasn't this been their agenda for thousands of years? It'll never change.