Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Maddow Blog-Judge overseeing Abrego case stunned after DOJ fails to answer simple questions
Throughout Monday’s hearing, lawyers for the administration repeatedly refused to provide answers to some very straightforward questions.
Judge overseeing Abrego case stunned after DOJ fails to answer simple questions.
— hateGOP (@hategop.bsky.social) 2025-07-08T23:40:40.660Z
Throughout Monday’s hearing, lawyers for the administration repeatedly refused to provide answers to some very straightforward questions.
www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddo...
Link to tweet
On Monday, Trump administration lawyers were taken apart during a federal court hearing in Maryland over the bizarre, bungled, seemingly lawless deportation of a man named Kilmar Abrego Garcia.
During that hourslong hearing, the same federal judge who ordered the government in April to bring Abrego back from prison in El Salvador became totally exasperated as Justice Department lawyers refused to give clear answers to her clear questions.....
When the judge asked Guynn which option it was likely to take, he said that the “current plan is to attempt to remove [Abrego] to a third country” but noted the government could reassess that plan. When Guynn reiterated that the administration had not made a final decision, the judge said she did not “buy that for a second.”
The back-and-forth continued as the judge pressed the administration about what third country it planned to send Abrego to. “I do not believe that has been determined yet,” Guynn said. “I think there's a number of countries with whom we have treaties and agreements ... and DHS would explore its options for removal closer to the time when they would be taking [Abrego] into custody.”
The judge then asked if the government had started the process of identifying a possible country. Another lawyer from the Justice Department intervened and said they did not have that information. The exchange, according to Lawfare’s Anna Bower, who was inside the courtroom, appeared to leave the judge confused.
Throughout that hearing, the lawyers for the Justice Department repeatedly refused to provide reasonable answers to some very straightforward questions......
But on Monday, there was a major development on that front. According to a new filing in federal district court in Washington, D.C., the country of El Salvador has seemingly contradicted the Trump administration’s claim.
That filing, submitted by lawyers for men being held in the prison, includes a document indicating that, as The New York Times reports, “the government of El Salvador recently told the United Nations that it bears no legal responsibility for the men. The document, written in response to a U.N. inquiry examining some of the deportations, also claimed that the Salvadoran government was merely doing the United States’ bidding when it accepted the men into its prison system.”
The ACLU’s Lee Gelernt, who is the lead counsel in this case, told NBC News that “El Salvador has confirmed what we and everyone else understood: It is the United States that controls what happens to the Venezuelans languishing at CECOT. Remarkably, the U.S. government didn’t provide this information to us or the court.”
During that hourslong hearing, the same federal judge who ordered the government in April to bring Abrego back from prison in El Salvador became totally exasperated as Justice Department lawyers refused to give clear answers to her clear questions.....
When the judge asked Guynn which option it was likely to take, he said that the “current plan is to attempt to remove [Abrego] to a third country” but noted the government could reassess that plan. When Guynn reiterated that the administration had not made a final decision, the judge said she did not “buy that for a second.”
The back-and-forth continued as the judge pressed the administration about what third country it planned to send Abrego to. “I do not believe that has been determined yet,” Guynn said. “I think there's a number of countries with whom we have treaties and agreements ... and DHS would explore its options for removal closer to the time when they would be taking [Abrego] into custody.”
The judge then asked if the government had started the process of identifying a possible country. Another lawyer from the Justice Department intervened and said they did not have that information. The exchange, according to Lawfare’s Anna Bower, who was inside the courtroom, appeared to leave the judge confused.
Throughout that hearing, the lawyers for the Justice Department repeatedly refused to provide reasonable answers to some very straightforward questions......
But on Monday, there was a major development on that front. According to a new filing in federal district court in Washington, D.C., the country of El Salvador has seemingly contradicted the Trump administration’s claim.
That filing, submitted by lawyers for men being held in the prison, includes a document indicating that, as The New York Times reports, “the government of El Salvador recently told the United Nations that it bears no legal responsibility for the men. The document, written in response to a U.N. inquiry examining some of the deportations, also claimed that the Salvadoran government was merely doing the United States’ bidding when it accepted the men into its prison system.”
The ACLU’s Lee Gelernt, who is the lead counsel in this case, told NBC News that “El Salvador has confirmed what we and everyone else understood: It is the United States that controls what happens to the Venezuelans languishing at CECOT. Remarkably, the U.S. government didn’t provide this information to us or the court.”