General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsYou Don't Want to Know Where Scientists Just Found 27 Million Tons of Plastic
https://gizmodo.com/you-dont-want-to-know-where-scientists-just-found-27-million-tons-of-plastic-2000632563Researchers from the Royal Netherlands Institute for Sea Research (NIOZ) and Utrecht University claim to be the first to provide a real estimate of ocean-polluting nanoplastics. Their research indicates that the North Atlantic Ocean alone hosts 27 million tons of floating plastic particles less than 1 micrometer (μm) in size.
-snip-
Unfortunately, there are a number of ways nanoparticles can end up in the oceans. While some likely arrive via rivers, others fall out of the sky with rain or on their own as dry deposition. (Yes, weve even found plastic pollution in the sky). Nanoparticles can also form when large pieces of plastic already in the ocean are broken down by waves and/or sunlight, according to the researchers. The question now is how this pollution is impacting the world and its creaturesincluding us.
It is already known that nanoplastics can penetrate deep into our bodies. They are even found in brain tissue. Now that we know they are so ubiquitous in the oceans, its also obvious that they penetrate the entire ecosystem; from bacteria and other microorganisms to fish and top predators like humans, said Helge Niemann, a geochemist at NIOZ and another co-author of the study. How that pollution affects the ecosystem needs further investigation.

ProfessorGAC
(73,653 posts)...on the line from The Graduate.
highplainsdem
(57,425 posts)calimary
(87,116 posts)angryxyouth
(277 posts)One word, are you listening? Plastics
BurnDoubt
(831 posts)God (literally) only knows what other stuff they'd find.
"What you don't know can't hurt you."
DumbFucks!!!!!
mjvpi
(1,691 posts)..this product has been shown to cause cancer in California . Good thing I live and work in Montana.
Kid Berwyn
(21,379 posts)With every coffin, Big Oil, Big Pharma and Big Chem bury their mistakes.
Cheezoholic
(3,120 posts)or wherever it gets washed. I read a journal a decade or 2 ago talking about it. Think about how much that is, every day
synni
(472 posts)Most clothes were 100% polyester back then. Why isn't anyone talking about the effects of that? Just the feel of those clothes was horrible!
I was.
Envirogal
(220 posts)But it didnt make it. Much of our clothes are made of recycled plastic now, called microfiber. When you look at what is coming out of that dryer lint, you can imagine what its like at the washing stage, draining into the sewer.
pandr32
(13,231 posts)They are replacing all our natural fiber clothes with it a little at a time. Bras! What sense does that make to where polymers right across our warm breasts? Baby clothes, too. Enough of it can be absorbed and interfere with our endocrine systems.
kimbutgar
(25,586 posts)And now its upsetting to hear there is one of these in the North Atlantic Ocean.
I have a friend whose husband is an oceanographer who recently retired from the National Geographic society and he showed me these pictures of the patch and it was so disgusting and outrageous.
ancianita
(41,097 posts)Mossfern
(4,107 posts)It's now near impossible to avoid them.
I'm old enough to remember when plastic toys first became popular - they just seemed to have no soul.
Scientists need to explore ways to replace them cheaply and safely.
I use cat litter bags that are vegetable based and can be composted.
We use bar soap that comes in paper/cardboard packaging.
Recycling is a joke. The vendor who collects it will reject an entire load if one item in the load is not recyclable.
I've see all sorts of shit in recycling bins - and people feel so righteous because they "recycle."
Ooooooo ...... I can rant about this forever, so I'll stop here.
littlemissmartypants
(28,470 posts)We have a very active Environment & Energy Forum. You should create some OPs.
https://democraticunderground.com/?com=forum&id=1127
❤️
Mossfern
(4,107 posts)I think I'll read a bunch of threads before I post
Hopefully it won't depress me.
littlemissmartypants
(28,470 posts)
ancianita
(41,097 posts)Keep in mind that we humans made this problem, and so we have to have the will to solve it.
You're definitely doing your part. Never weary in doing well.
Polybius
(20,555 posts)Us 80's kids vehemently disagree. We made our GI Joe's, He-Man's, Transformers, and Thundercat's come alive!
llmart
(16,644 posts)My biggest rant is about all the crap people think they just have to have in life. Like you, I'm old enough to remember when people didn't need all this crap. The three R's - reduce, reuse and recycle - they always concentrate on the last two R's, but it's the first R that would solve more problems. REDUCE means don't buy the stuff you don't absolutely need.
I read where even the microbeads found in women's facial products like scrubs are polluting the oceans. Like you, I use bar soap too. That's what we used growing up. I am a certified environmental steward and in one of our many field trips we went to a county recycling center which I found fascinating. Everyone should be made to go one time to see just how the process works. And yes, an awful lot of what you put in those bins never gets recycled.
I truly think getting through to people about this issue is impossible.
Gimpyknee
(374 posts)Mossfern
(4,107 posts)Why?
Karasu
(1,654 posts)Last edited Tue Jul 22, 2025, 09:53 PM - Edit history (1)
issues, they'll just go away, don't you know.
More than anything, it's about preserving the status quo until the bitter end, solely for maximum profit. Pure end-stage capitalism shit.
moonscape
(5,572 posts)Unwind Your Mind
(2,284 posts)Priorities you know?
IcyPeas
(23,919 posts)It's difficult to find plain old cotton clothes. I've searched on Amazon for 100% cotton t-shirts and the results are often not cotton but polyester mixes. You have to read the description for the actual fabric composition. It's a fault in their algorithms that when you specifically search for cotton or 100% cotton that this other crap shows up. I know they do this to get you to buy something. I NEVER buy clothes or sheets ot towels made of polyester.
Furthermore, brands use synthetic fibres like polyester, nylon and acrylic which take hundreds of years to biodegrade. A 2017 report from the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) estimated that 35% of all microplastics tiny pieces of non-biodegradable plastic found in the ocean come from the laundering of synthetic textiles like polyester.
According to 2015 documentary The True Cost, the world consumes around 80 billion new pieces of clothing every year, 400% more than the consumption twenty years ago. The average American now generates 82 pounds of textile waste each year. The production of leather requires large amounts of feed, land, water and fossil fuels to raise livestock, while the tanning process is among the most toxic in all of the fashion supply chain because the chemicals used to tan leather- including mineral salts, formaldehyde, coal-tar derivatives and various oils and dyes- is not biodegradable and contaminates water sources.
Fast Fashion and Its Environmental Impact in 2025 | Earth.Org https://share.google/VrptXkZ3QlcoVLXMe
Greg_In_SF
(385 posts)Guilfoyle's face?
Orrex
(65,575 posts)Add the same amount everywhere, and it all cancels out?
Problem solved!
Hugin
(36,642 posts)Its already been tried, Orrex.
What we need is deeper oceans!
Jerry2144
(2,914 posts)the felon allows near him
dexdah
(59 posts)Brought to you by ánthrōpos!
FakeNoose
(37,948 posts)
Passages
(3,290 posts)mountain grammy
(28,020 posts)That I got to live my childhood without plastics. My sandwich was wrapped in waxed paper and put in a paper bag that I was supposed to bring home every day.
When I was 20, I used cloth diapers for my first son and had a diaper service, but plastic was taking over.
By the time I had my second son in1971, diaper service was gone and there were several brands of disposable diapers.
Now were made of plastic. Only took 50 years.