Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin

(128,924 posts)
Mon Aug 25, 2025, 01:21 PM Aug 25

CNN Analyst Pinpoints The Weirdest Part Of Ghislaine Maxwell's 'Simply Bizarre' DOJ Interview

CNN senior legal analyst Elie Honig expressed serious skepticism over claims made by Ghislaine Maxwell in the just-released transcripts of her interview with the Department of Justice.

Maxwell, currently serving a 20-year prison sentence for helping disgraced financier Jeffrey Epstein sexually abuse underage girls, is seeking a pardon from President Donald Trump and sang his praises in her interview with Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche last month.

Asked Friday on CNN’s “The Lead” whether he found Maxwell’s account “credible,” Honig responded, “Oh my gosh, no,” before explaining what he found odd about her take.

“In this transcript, Ghislaine Maxwell provides a simply bizarre worldview wherein almost nobody did anything wrong,” Honig said. “She doesn’t even actually implicate Jeffrey Epstein.”

https://www.yahoo.com/news/articles/cnn-analyst-pinpoints-weirdest-part-171140719.html

4 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
CNN Analyst Pinpoints The Weirdest Part Of Ghislaine Maxwell's 'Simply Bizarre' DOJ Interview (Original Post) Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin Aug 25 OP
She has maintained her and Epstein's total innocence all along, at any opportunity she was given AZJonnie Aug 25 #1
The part where she basically exonerates johnnyfins Aug 25 #2
She was hildegaard28 Aug 25 #3
Yes, Chris Hayes made this observation the same day the transcript came senseandsensibility Aug 25 #4

AZJonnie

(1,616 posts)
1. She has maintained her and Epstein's total innocence all along, at any opportunity she was given
Mon Aug 25, 2025, 01:27 PM
Aug 25

Of course, she didn't have the gumption to get on the stand and say that at her own trial But that is what she's always maintained, so it's hardly what I'd call 'bizarre' (for her, I mean) in this particular context. And obviously she's going to buff Trump's knob in this particular interview, say exactly what she thinks will please him. He is the only one with control over her fate. And guess what? It paid off, in spades.

johnnyfins

(2,944 posts)
2. The part where she basically exonerates
Mon Aug 25, 2025, 01:30 PM
Aug 25

"Epstein" as she refers to him, is the oddest and most important part. If he did nothing wrong, then no one did.

Isnt it odd that she doesnt refer to him as Jeff or Jeffrey?

hildegaard28

(780 posts)
3. She was
Mon Aug 25, 2025, 02:17 PM
Aug 25

Just reading a script. That's why they gave her immunity. They knew it was all a lie and they didn't want future administrations holding her accountable.

senseandsensibility

(23,930 posts)
4. Yes, Chris Hayes made this observation the same day the transcript came
Mon Aug 25, 2025, 02:20 PM
Aug 25

out. The woman absolves Epstein himself!

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»CNN Analyst Pinpoints The...