Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsCourt throws out lawsuit by Trump administration against all Maryland federal judges
BALTIMORE (AP) A federal judge on Tuesday threw out the Trump administrations lawsuit against Marylands entire federal bench over an order by the chief judge that stopped the immediate deportation of migrants challenging their removals.
U.S. District Judge Thomas Cullen granted a request by the judges to toss the case, saying to do otherwise would run counter to overwhelming precedent, depart from longstanding constitutional tradition, and offend the rule of law.
In their wisdom, the Constitutions framers joined three coordinate branches to establish a single sovereign, Cullen wrote. That structure may occasionally engender clashes between two branches and encroachment by one branch on anothers authority. But mediating those disputes must occur in a manner that respects the Judiciarys constitutional role.
The White House had no immediate comment.
Cullen was nominated to the federal bench by Trump in 2020. He serves in the Western District of Virginia, but he was tapped to oversee the case because all 15 of Marylands federal judges are named as defendants, a highly unusual circumstance that reflects the Republican administrations harsh response to judges who slow or stop its policies.
U.S. District Judge Thomas Cullen granted a request by the judges to toss the case, saying to do otherwise would run counter to overwhelming precedent, depart from longstanding constitutional tradition, and offend the rule of law.
In their wisdom, the Constitutions framers joined three coordinate branches to establish a single sovereign, Cullen wrote. That structure may occasionally engender clashes between two branches and encroachment by one branch on anothers authority. But mediating those disputes must occur in a manner that respects the Judiciarys constitutional role.
The White House had no immediate comment.
Cullen was nominated to the federal bench by Trump in 2020. He serves in the Western District of Virginia, but he was tapped to oversee the case because all 15 of Marylands federal judges are named as defendants, a highly unusual circumstance that reflects the Republican administrations harsh response to judges who slow or stop its policies.
https://www.yahoo.com/news/articles/court-throws-lawsuit-trump-administration-144112352.html
3 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

Court throws out lawsuit by Trump administration against all Maryland federal judges (Original Post)
In It to Win It
Tuesday
OP
Deadline: Legal Blog--Trump appointee calls out Trump administration's efforts to 'smear' judges
LetMyPeopleVote
Tuesday
#2
Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin
(127,813 posts)1. Tough luck Slobfather
LetMyPeopleVote
(168,791 posts)2. Deadline: Legal Blog--Trump appointee calls out Trump administration's efforts to 'smear' judges
Judge Thomas Cullen called executive officials remarks in recent months both unprecedented and unfortunate.
Trump appointee calls out Trump administrationâs efforts to âsmearâ judges www.msnbc.com/deadline-whi...
— @jimrissmiller.bsky.social 2025-08-26T18:37:41.370Z
Link to tweet
https://www.msnbc.com/deadline-white-house/deadline-legal-blog/trump-judges-thomas-cullen-smear-judiciary-rcna227238
President Donald Trumps second term has been marked by his administrations attempts to bend or break the law and lashing out at judges who stand in the way. The administrations remarks against judges led one of Trumps own judicial appointees to speak out in a published opinion on Tuesday.
U.S. District Judge Thomas Cullen noted that in recent months, executive officials and their spokespeople have described federal district judges across the country as left-wing, liberal, activists, radical, politically minded, rogue, unhinged, outrageous, overzealous, [and] unconstitutional, [c]rooked, and worse.......
But he wrote that this concerted effort by the Executive to smear and impugn individual judges who rule against it is both unprecedented and unfortunate.......
Much as the Executive fights the characterization, a lawsuit by the executive branch of government against the judicial branch for the exercise of judicial power is not ordinary, Cullen wrote in dismissing the case, adding: Whatever the merits of its grievance with the judges of the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, the Executive must find a proper way to raise those concerns.,,,,,,
Notably, Cullen cited the Abrego case in his ruling Tuesday. Specifically, he cited an opinion from April by appellate Judge J. Harvie Wilkinson III, a Reagan appointee who has likewise called out the administrations actions.
Cullen and Wilkinson havent been the only GOP appointees to do so. Its unlikely theyll be the last.
U.S. District Judge Thomas Cullen noted that in recent months, executive officials and their spokespeople have described federal district judges across the country as left-wing, liberal, activists, radical, politically minded, rogue, unhinged, outrageous, overzealous, [and] unconstitutional, [c]rooked, and worse.......
But he wrote that this concerted effort by the Executive to smear and impugn individual judges who rule against it is both unprecedented and unfortunate.......
Much as the Executive fights the characterization, a lawsuit by the executive branch of government against the judicial branch for the exercise of judicial power is not ordinary, Cullen wrote in dismissing the case, adding: Whatever the merits of its grievance with the judges of the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, the Executive must find a proper way to raise those concerns.,,,,,,
Notably, Cullen cited the Abrego case in his ruling Tuesday. Specifically, he cited an opinion from April by appellate Judge J. Harvie Wilkinson III, a Reagan appointee who has likewise called out the administrations actions.
Cullen and Wilkinson havent been the only GOP appointees to do so. Its unlikely theyll be the last.
malaise
(288,313 posts)3. Good
Rec