General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsDeadline: Legal Blog-Jeanine Pirro's office fails three times to convince grand jurors to return indictment
Prosecutors in the capital failed a shocking three times to secure an indictment in a case of an alleged assault against a federal agent.
ð¤£ð¤£ð¤£ð¤£ð¤£ð¤£ð¤£ð¤£ð¤£ð¤£ð¤£
— Tabby (@tabbys-corner.bsky.social) 2025-08-26T16:11:17.595Z
Poor big bad FBI agent hurt his wittle hand! ð¤£ð¤£ð¤£ð¤£
Jeanine Pirroâs office fails three times to convince grand jurors to return indictment www.msnbc.com/deadline-whi...
https://www.msnbc.com/deadline-white-house/deadline-legal-blog/jeanine-pirro-washington-indictment-rcna227190
The rejection came in the case of Sidney Reid, who prosecutors in Washington alleged last month had forcefully pushed an FBI agents hand against a cement wall and caused lacerations on the agents hand during an immigration enforcement protest.....
Monday afternoon came and the government filed not an indictment but a notice to the court. It said not only that an Indictment has not been returned in this case but, incredibly, that a third grand jury returned a no true bill. A true bill is when the grand jury votes to indict.,.....
Its worth noting that this is only a preliminary phase of the case, and if it moves forward to trial, prosecutors must prove it to the people of D.C. beyond a reasonable doubt to secure a conviction. Theres a general line of thinking that, however embarrassing it is for a grand jury to return a no true bill, in those rare times that happens, grand jurors have done prosecutors a favor of sorts by keeping a potentially shaky case from a trial jury.
Still, three times might be a sign that the message shouldve been received at least the second time.
But the U.S. Attorneys Office led by former Fox News host Jeanine Pirro isnt giving up. Not completely. Though prosecutors are apparently no longer trying to make it a felony case, they filed whats called an information that charges Reid with a misdemeanor assault. That lets them move the case a hobbled version of it, anyway forward without grand jury approval.

UTUSN
(75,504 posts)question everything
(50,908 posts)LetMyPeopleVote
(169,313 posts)There are different ways of reading the stunning action by a Washington grand jury amid Trumps federal crackdown on the nations capital.
Link to tweet
https://www.msnbc.com/deadline-white-house/deadline-legal-blog/dc-sandwich-thrower-grand-jury-indictment-decline-matters-rcna227748
Its a stunning result with serious implications no matter what motivated the rejection. Yet, what those implications are, exactly, could depend on the rationale for refusing to approve a felony charge against the man who became a folk hero in D.C. amid the Trump administrations federal crackdown in the nations capital......
But something bigger may have been at play: jury nullification. Thats when jurors believe that prosecutors have proved the technical elements of the case but, nonetheless, the jury renders a moral objection by way of a not guilty verdict (or in the case of a grand jury, a no true bill).
To put the question one way: Did grand jurors think the government did a bad job, or a bad thing?.....
Importantly, we have more than Dunns case to go on in analyzing this phenomenon. Theres the even more shocking recent failure of D.C. prosecutors to get an indictment against Sidney Reid a whopping three times. She was initially charged under the same federal assault statute as Dunn. After striking out in the grand jury, prosecutors reduced her case to a misdemeanor, which doesnt require grand jury approval.
Lets assume for a moment that grand jurors in both the Dunn and Reid cases just thought there wasnt enough proof to charge them with felonies. The known facts of both cases certainly allow for that possibility. Through that lens, the message to prosecutors is that they need to more carefully evaluate the quality of cases they bring.
But if the message is that the people of D.C. are declining to approve charges despite the evidence presented to them, thats something that should worry prosecutors even more.
I am personally voting that both cases are jury nullification and Piro needs to worry if she takes these cases to trial.
LetMyPeopleVote
(169,313 posts)Link to tweet
3 days ago a DC Grand Jury declined to indict a woman for assaulting an ICE agent (a scratch on his hand).
Today another grand jury declined to indict the guy who threw a sub at an ICE agent!
FREE DC!

LetMyPeopleVote
(169,313 posts)In at least three cases so far, grand jurors have refused to approve felony charges against people the administration said assaulted law enforcement.
Strike four ⦠Trumpâs unqualified DOJ may please him, but theyâre losing like nobodyâs ever seen before in front of the Grand Jury.
— @jimrissmiller.bsky.social 2025-08-31T20:16:33.324Z
Grand jury rejects yet another felony indictment in Trump's D.C. crackdown www.msnbc.com/deadline-whi...
https://www.msnbc.com/deadline-white-house/deadline-legal-blog/trump-dc-crackdown-grand-jury-reject-felony-indictment-rcna228104
We already knew about the whopping triple failure to indict Sidney Reid, as well as the failure to do the same against sandwich thrower Sean Dunn. Both cases are proceeding as misdemeanors instead of felonies after grand juries rejected more serious charges of assaulting law enforcement.
Now, grand jurors have declined to approve another indictment in a case charged under that same assault statute. This one involves Alvin Summers, whose case prosecutors actually moved to dismiss (though without prejudice, meaning they could try again later, a distinction that dominated the saga surrounding New York City Mayor Eric Adams). Seeking a permanent dismissal on Thursday, Summers lawyers wrote that the officers testimony was rejected by the grand jury, presumably after reviewing the body-worn camera video.....
That previously led me to wonder, in examining the Reid and Dunn cases, whether grand jurors simply thought prosecutors couldnt satisfy the relatively low evidentiary burden at this preliminary stage of a case, or whether grand jurors were making more profound statements of nullification, the latter referring to situations in which jurors believe prosecutors have proved their cases but nonetheless reject them because they find the prosecutions or what they represent offensive.
The implications of either scenario are striking. And remember, this is just what we know about what has happened so far. This incredible story is still being written, but its one that cant be ignored amid everything else thats abnormal in these times.