General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsRFK Jr. cites circumcision in defending Tylenol-autism link
Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. said that giving Tylenol to infant boys after circumcision could be a cause of autism among males.
On Thursday, Kennedy praised Trumps Tylenol announcement and highlighted two studies that have indicated that male infant circumcision is correlated with autism diagnoses, suggesting that it is because of giving the baby Tylenol for pain management.
There's two studies that show children who are circumcised early have double the rate of autism. It's highly likely because they're given Tylenol, said Kennedy. You know, none of this is dispositive. All of it should be paid attention to.
Snip...
https://www.msn.com/en-us/health/other/rfk-jr-cites-circumcision-in-defending-tylenol-autism-link/ar-AA1OaeMx

hlthe2b
(111,657 posts)JHC. He is as insane as Trump.
Wifes husband
(612 posts)rurallib
(64,238 posts)quit digging junior
Irish_Dem
(76,111 posts)Hmmm....
CTyankee
(67,228 posts)allegorical oracle
(5,789 posts)a behavioral spectrum revealed by tests. More instances of the spectrum have increased because testing has improved. RFK has an agenda. Perhaps he's on the autism spectrum.
JoseBalow
(8,648 posts)Problem solved
Klarkashton
(4,285 posts)He's always with the "studies". They always turn out to be some defective bullshit.
maxsolomon
(37,528 posts)Where the dead father is a de-licensed doctor and the 2nd study cites the 1st study as corroborating evidence.
Mark & David Geier. Geier the younger is leading the Federal Autism Vaccine study.
unblock
(55,685 posts)That ought to make his head explode.
(Yes, my daughter had a circumcision. She's trans)
riversedge
(78,310 posts)I hope Tylenol company is preparing a Huge law suit against kennedy jr.
Mike Niendorff
(3,631 posts)And Tylenol has nothing whatsoever to do with any of that.
MDN
CTyankee
(67,228 posts)Mike Niendorff
(3,631 posts)Victims should have the right to sue -- both the parents and the person(s) who perform such acts of ritual mutilation-- at bare minimum from the moment they turn 18.
And no, I don't care at all about the religious connotations, that is utterly irrelevant.
A child's right to bodily integrity absolutely supersedes a parent's religious ideology.
So yeah, put me down as another outlier in this mad age where we accept casual monstrosities without blinking an eye.
MDN
Hekate
(99,766 posts)Mike Niendorff
(3,631 posts)Ok then.
MDN
Response to CTyankee (Reply #15)
Hekate This message was self-deleted by its author.
Celerity
(52,463 posts)mike_c
(36,786 posts)...is strongly correlated with RFK Jr's age. Let's do a thought experiment. While the mid-twentieth century data are sketchy because autism was not even a legit diagnosis in 1960, Wikipedia estimates that per capita US autism rates were likely about 0.5 per 1,000 births in the 1960s. Let's be conservative and say 0.5/1000 is an accurate historical estimate of autism incidence prior to the 1960s.
RFK Jr was born in 1954. We presume he was not very effective at driving up autism rates during early childhood, but by the 1980s, when RFK Jr was a young man, U.S. autism diagnoses doubled to roughly 1 in 1,000 births. Coincidence or causation? Do your own research! Consider that as RFK Jr has aged, autism rates have increased dramatically, in lockstep with his misspent lifespan. By 1995 approximately 1 in 500 children were diagnosed with autism spectrum disorder, ten years later that number had increased to 1 in 150 births, and by 2015 to 1 autism diagnosis per every 58 births. In 2022, 1 in 31 children were autistic.
How could this be any clearer?! For every year that data exists, autism rates have been higher on each of RFK Jr's birthdays than they were on his previous birthday! Hello! Is this thing on?! RFK Jr's demented existence correlates precisely with the growth of autism. Hardly anyone was autistic prior to RFK Jr's appearance. During his lifetime autism rates have skyrocketed. QED!
That was fun!
Ping Tung
(3,845 posts)Saul told David that he could have his daughter if he brought 100 Philistine foreskins to him. David was hot to get the wife so he brought back 200 foreskins to prove his loyalty.
https://web.mit.edu/jywang/www/cef/Bible/NIV/NIV_Bible/1SAM+18.html
1 Samuel 18
26
When the attendants told David these things, he was pleased to become the king's son-in-law. So before the allotted time elapsed,
27
David and his men went out and killed two hundred Philistines. He brought their foreskins and presented the full number to the king so that he might become the king's son-in-law. Then Saul gave him his daughter Michal in marriage.
28
When Saul realized that the LORD was with David and that his daughter Michal loved David,
milestogo
(21,968 posts)What about Muslim girls who get tylenol for FGM?
Straw Man
(6,906 posts)Band-Aids cause cancer?
Jack Valentino
(3,542 posts)LetMyPeopleVote
(171,105 posts)Hotez is the dean of the National School of Tropical Medicine at Houstons Baylor College of Medicine, and he co-directs the Texas Childrens Hospital Center for Vaccine Development. His many books include The Deadly Rise of Anti-Science and the new Science Under Siege, which he co-wrote with Michael E. Mann.
âHe picks things that seem designed to get clicks on the internet. He gravitates toward magical-seeming, spectacular explanations like Tylenol and circumcision,â said Peter Hotez. www.houstonchronicle.com/opinion/outl...
— Gary Schwitzer (@garyschw.bsky.social) 2025-10-10T12:18:08.319Z
https://www.houstonchronicle.com/opinion/outlook/article/hotez-autism-circumcision-rfk-21093425.php?utm_campaign=CMS%20Sharing%20Tools%20(Premium)&utm_source=t.co&utm_medium=referral
"Thats absurd, said vaccine scientist and author Peter Hotez, who has long disagreed with Kennedys pronouncements about the causes of autism.
His statements are increasingly untethered to reality, Hotez said Friday. Its actually worrisome that hed pick circumcision as a factor to highlight.......
Hotez is frustrated:
One, he still doesnt acknowledge the role that genes play in autism.
Two, he doesnt acknowledge actual, well documented environmental factors. Lots of studies find weak associations for all sorts of things. But the evidence for some environmental factors, like Valproic, is much, much stronger.
And three, he picks things that seem designed to get clicks on the internet. He gravitates toward magical-seeming, spectacular explanations like Tylenol and circumcision.