Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

imanamerican63

(15,510 posts)
Fri Oct 10, 2025, 10:58 AM Friday

"Suspending who?"

Trump is in a morbid state?

He couldn’t comprehend what the reporter actually meant when the was question was asked if he, Trump, would suspend “habeas corpus” to deal the so called insurrectionist?

He asked “suspending who”, thinking that habeas corpus was a person, then Trump asked for help by Noemmmie!

The conclusion is in, perhaps and period!






4 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
"Suspending who?" (Original Post) imanamerican63 Friday OP
MaddowBlog-Trump's line on possibly suspending habeas corpus goes from bad to worse LetMyPeopleVote Friday #1
He thought it was a person Historic NY Friday #2
That boy just ain't RIGHT! Jilly_in_VA Friday #3
the rank ignorance ..... on full display ! stopdiggin Friday #4

LetMyPeopleVote

(171,106 posts)
1. MaddowBlog-Trump's line on possibly suspending habeas corpus goes from bad to worse
Fri Oct 10, 2025, 11:10 AM
Friday

The president said he’d leave the future of habeas corpus up to Kristi Noem, who recently made clear that she didn’t know what habeas corpus was.

Pressed on possibly suspending habeas corpus, Trump said he’d leave it up to Kristi Noem.

Among the problems: Noem has already made clear that she has no idea what habeas corpus is. www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddo...

Steve Benen (@stevebenen.com) 2025-10-09T15:55:01.211Z

https://www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddow-show/maddowblog/trumps-line-possibly-suspending-habeas-corpus-goes-bad-worse-rcna236649

The first sign of trouble emerged in early May. After the Trump administration suffered a series of legal setbacks in federal courts, White House deputy chief of staff Stephen Miller told reporters that he and his colleagues were “actively looking” at possibly suspending the writ of habeas corpus......

In the four months that followed Miller’s comments, neither Donald Trump nor anyone on his team followed through on this, though it did come up again during a weird White House event about antifa. HuffPost reported:

Donald Trump was asked at Wednesday’s White House roundtable that included far-right content creators ... if he’d ‘given any more thought to possibly suspending habeas corpus to not only deal with these insurrectionists across the nation but also to continue rapidly deporting illegal aliens.’ ‘Yeah, uh, suspending who?’ the president replied.


After the questioner repeated the question, the president said: “Oh, I don’t know. I’d rather leave that to [Homeland Security Secretary] Kristi [Noem].”.....

During a congressional hearing in May, Democratic Sen. Maggie Hassan of New Hampshire asked Noem: “What is habeas corpus?”

The South Dakota Republican replied, “Habeas corpus is a constitutional right that the president has to be able to remove people from this country,” at which point the senator interrupted to note: “Excuse me, that’s incorrect.”.....

Habeas corpus is the legal principle that requires that the government provide a public reason for detaining and imprisoning people,” the New Hampshire Democrat explained. “[bI]f not for that protection, the government could simply arrest people, including American citizens, and hold them indefinitely for no reason. ... Habeas corpus is the foundational right that separates free societies like America from police states like North Korea.”......

In case this weren’t quite enough, when Democratic Sen. Andy Kim of New Jersey asked the Cabinet secretary which part of the Constitution includes habeas corpus, Noem was again stumped.

Nevertheless, when the president was asked about whether this bedrock legal principle would remain intact in the United States, Trump appeared lost and deferred to a Cabinet secretary who also seems to have a questionable grasp on the underlying subject.

Jilly_in_VA

(13,258 posts)
3. That boy just ain't RIGHT!
Fri Oct 10, 2025, 11:28 AM
Friday

That's what we'd say in east Tennessee. I can imagine the mamaws and papaws shaking their heads, even if they voted for him.

stopdiggin

(14,486 posts)
4. the rank ignorance ..... on full display !
Fri Oct 10, 2025, 12:27 PM
Friday

God this is embarrassing!
(they just keep proving how incompetent and incapable ... )

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»"Suspending who?"