Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

babylonsister

(172,403 posts)
Sun Oct 12, 2025, 08:17 AM 11 hrs ago

'A Huge Problem': DOJ May Have Withheld Evidence Suggesting Letitia James' Innocence



‘A Huge Problem’: DOJ May Have Withheld Evidence Suggesting Letitia James’ Innocence
by Adam Lynch | October 12, 2025 - 5:33am

— from Alternet


The New York Times reports U.S. Attorney Lindsey Halligan may have left out important information in her indictment against New York AG Letitia James that might have derailed some charges.

“In the indictment, … Halligan accuses Ms. James of having misrepresented the purpose of the house when she purchased it in August 2020 for $137,000,” reports the Times. “The indictment says that while Ms. James indicated to her mortgage broker that she expected to use the house as a second home, she had instead used it as a “rental investment property, renting the property to a family.”

Only it does not look like she rented it at all.


The Times reports occupant Nakia Thompson — Letitia James’ grandniece — testified to a grand jury in Norfolk, VA. that she “had lived in the house for years (with her children) and that she did not pay rent,” according to a person familiar with her testimony.

Additionally, The Times reports prosecutors did not ask Nakia Thompson to testify again, and the grand jury that voted to indict Letitia James was not seated in Norfolk, where this information was revealed, but in Alexandria.

Lawfare Senior Editor Anna Bower posted on X that she suspected prosecutors “used the other grand jury for testimony, then moved things over to Alexandria to seek indictment.”

But the big problem in the testimony, according to legal analyst Jeffrey Evan Gold, is that Halligan may have excluded this evidence to pad her case against James, which — if proven true — would not go well for her in court.

more...

http://www.smirkingchimp.com/thread/adam-lynch/115132/a-huge-problem-doj-may-have-withheld-evidence-suggesting-letitia-james-innocence
35 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
'A Huge Problem': DOJ May Have Withheld Evidence Suggesting Letitia James' Innocence (Original Post) babylonsister 11 hrs ago OP
K&R spanone 10 hrs ago #1
Exactly what punishment will Halligan face? Baitball Blogger 10 hrs ago #2
Nothing that a presidential pardon won't cover. sop 10 hrs ago #3
There's so many criminals committing so many crimes, he's bound to forget a few pardons. W_HAMILTON 10 hrs ago #8
You know what would be great? OldBaldy1701E 10 hrs ago #5
I don't think... GiqueCee 10 hrs ago #10
He cannot, but he cannot do a number of things that he is either trying or doing. OldBaldy1701E 9 hrs ago #11
I like it. Joinfortmill 9 hrs ago #14
Disbarment AverageOldGuy 10 hrs ago #9
Loss of her law license before joining Fox News? Ruby the Liberal 9 hrs ago #12
She's clearly auditioning for a future FOX News legal analyst gig. sop 9 hrs ago #23
More evidence when she is eventually disbarred. mackdaddy 9 hrs ago #17
Low Bar Barbie will skate free. ananda 9 hrs ago #22
Lose law license? multigraincracker 8 hrs ago #28
A bar association might get around to it IbogaProject 8 hrs ago #29
The outstanding "competence" of these clowns is breathtaking... littlemissmartypants 10 hrs ago #4
James knows this JustAnotherGen 10 hrs ago #6
And then I hope she sues the DOJ Raven123 8 hrs ago #30
I'm shocked... GiqueCee 10 hrs ago #7
I'm shocked that the American legal system is built with so many loopholes 70sEraVet 9 hrs ago #15
It is my understanding... GiqueCee 9 hrs ago #18
Because, of course they did....We're going to have our own form of the Nuremberg Trials Joinfortmill 9 hrs ago #13
"May"? no_hypocrisy 9 hrs ago #16
The legal profession needs to get its shit together. Far too many unethical travelingthrulife 9 hrs ago #20
She should be disbarred and join Trump's under the bus club with Giuliani, Eastman, Cohen etc ..... ChicagoTeamster 9 hrs ago #19
the revenge deppartment. AllaN01Bear 9 hrs ago #21
Lindsey Hooligan ought to be disbarred for that stunt. Ocelot II 9 hrs ago #24
May have......... twodogsbarking 9 hrs ago #25
Malicious prosecution. Add it to the evidence. n/t CousinIT 8 hrs ago #26
Wine Box figet Jeannie is trying to indict in local DC courts Historic NY 8 hrs ago #27
"excluded this evidence to pad her case " ... that's called **LYING!!**, Why isn't she going to jail ?!?!?! uponit7771 7 hrs ago #31
Kick SheltieLover 6 hrs ago #32
Who is surprised by this LetMyPeopleVote 4 hrs ago #33
I'm not a lawyer, but that smacks of a conspiracy to manipulate the evidence. n/t Greybnk48 4 hrs ago #34
K&R. nt Wednesdays 2 hrs ago #35

W_HAMILTON

(9,639 posts)
8. There's so many criminals committing so many crimes, he's bound to forget a few pardons.
Sun Oct 12, 2025, 09:18 AM
10 hrs ago

OldBaldy1701E

(9,296 posts)
5. You know what would be great?
Sun Oct 12, 2025, 09:14 AM
10 hrs ago

If a federal judge would lock her up for contempt for doing this.

Then, when Donnie Convict pardons her... the judge does it again for the next thing she does. And, again. And, again.

Just keep on locking her up for contempt charges for lying to the court as well as trying to get her way in the courtroom by less than proper methods, whatever she is doing that day in the courtroom. Every time she does anything... lock her up for contempt.

They cannot pardon stuff in advance. They damned well cannot stop a judge from doing this. And, I doubt she can keep herself from acting the fool anyway, so...

GiqueCee

(2,891 posts)
10. I don't think...
Sun Oct 12, 2025, 09:20 AM
10 hrs ago

... that Prezzidint Pisswig can pardon anyone on state charges, only federal ones. Those with greater knowledge on the subject should feel free to correct me if I'm mistaken.

OldBaldy1701E

(9,296 posts)
11. He cannot, but he cannot do a number of things that he is either trying or doing.
Sun Oct 12, 2025, 09:29 AM
9 hrs ago

Why stop now?

Plus, he is hot to get some federal charges on her, because that way he is not reliant on some state to do his dirty work.

(He would prefer that they did, but he hates that he does not get to be a tough guy to her himself. Not that he would ever actually be in the same room as her without several large goons because a strong, black woman is far too scary to someone like him.)

AverageOldGuy

(3,045 posts)
9. Disbarment
Sun Oct 12, 2025, 09:19 AM
10 hrs ago

She is an attorney who is barred in federal bar and one or more states. Federal judge can start disbarment while each state will require a separate process.

mackdaddy

(1,880 posts)
17. More evidence when she is eventually disbarred.
Sun Oct 12, 2025, 09:56 AM
9 hrs ago

Like many of Trump's other past lawyers.

'would you like fries with that?'

JustAnotherGen

(37,201 posts)
6. James knows this
Sun Oct 12, 2025, 09:15 AM
10 hrs ago

That's why she was smirking when she gave her address.

She is going to chew up Halligan and spit her out alive.

GiqueCee

(2,891 posts)
7. I'm shocked...
Sun Oct 12, 2025, 09:16 AM
10 hrs ago

... SHOCKED! That a Republican would lie to further the unwarranted prosecution of a vindictive madman! Oh, wait... right. Lying is all these scumbags know how to do. Which says nothing good about the judgement or character of those that persist in voting for them.
Mop the floor with that vile creature, Leticia.

70sEraVet

(4,988 posts)
15. I'm shocked that the American legal system is built with so many loopholes
Sun Oct 12, 2025, 09:50 AM
9 hrs ago

so that a grand jury indictment is a slam-dunk for any less-than-ethical prosecutor!
My understanding is that the purpose of a grand jury, is to determine if there is sufficient evidence for proceeding to Court. But if a prosecutor is free to leave any evidence out that could cast doubt on their case.....

GiqueCee

(2,891 posts)
18. It is my understanding...
Sun Oct 12, 2025, 09:58 AM
9 hrs ago

... that withholding exculpatory evidence constitutes prosecutorial misconduct, which is supposed to be a big legal no-no. But we are talking about Republicans here, and honesty and integrity are to them like water was to the Wicked Witch of the West.

travelingthrulife

(3,469 posts)
20. The legal profession needs to get its shit together. Far too many unethical
Sun Oct 12, 2025, 10:03 AM
9 hrs ago

lawyers and judges. And they just move from one scam to the next.

ChicagoTeamster

(45 posts)
19. She should be disbarred and join Trump's under the bus club with Giuliani, Eastman, Cohen etc .....
Sun Oct 12, 2025, 10:01 AM
9 hrs ago

How does he continue to get these people to violate their oaths and commit acts that they should know are unethical if not always illegal after seeing what has happened to so many that have gone before them? All of these people have been working for him previously. He must have something he holds over them.

Ocelot II

(127,681 posts)
24. Lindsey Hooligan ought to be disbarred for that stunt.
Sun Oct 12, 2025, 10:16 AM
9 hrs ago

Fortunately, the state agencies that handle attorney licensing are beyond the reach of Trump's Department of Just Us, as a number of other former lawyers have learned the hard way.

Historic NY

(39,347 posts)
27. Wine Box figet Jeannie is trying to indict in local DC courts
Sun Oct 12, 2025, 10:46 AM
8 hrs ago

because a Federal G J keeps no billing/ she's pissed off the Judge.

uponit7771

(93,284 posts)
31. "excluded this evidence to pad her case " ... that's called **LYING!!**, Why isn't she going to jail ?!?!?!
Sun Oct 12, 2025, 12:02 PM
7 hrs ago

No wonder we have more people in jail per capita cause prosecutors lying by omission is called "padding a case"

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»'A Huge Problem': DOJ May...