General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsMaddowBlog-GOP's Jim Jordan on judges: 'I don't think you should rule out impeachment'
Most Americans dont want to see judges impeached over anti-Trump rulings. A key House Republican said its on the table anyway.
Remember when several Republicans launched impeachment efforts against federal judges in response to rulings the White House didnât like?
— Steve Benen (@stevebenen.com) 2025-10-10T16:02:36.480Z
Jim Jordan â the chair of the House Judiciary Committee â isnât ready to walk away from the idea. www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddo...
https://www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddow-show/maddowblog/gops-jim-jordan-judges-dont-think-rule-impeachment-rcna236876
House Judiciary Committee Chairman Jim Jordan said impeachment of judges who issue stupid rulings thwarting President Trump is on the table, though he said Congress needs to explore other options first. ... Any impeachment proceedings would start in Mr. Jordans committee. He said that shouldnt be the first option for judges who have foiled Mr. Trump or otherwise issued troubling rulings, but its on the table as an eventual option.
The far-right Ohio Republican and Trump loyalist didnt indicate plans to try to impeach jurists anytime soon, but he told the conservative newspaper, I dont think you should rule out impeachment.......
There was, of course, no evidence in support of any of this rhetoric. Nevertheless, a group of congressional Republicans apparently interpreted Trumps appeal as a directive and got to work introducing impeachment resolutions against judges whove ruled in ways the White House didnt like.
Indeed, the list grew quickly. Over the course of a few weeks, GOP impeachment resolutions were filed against U.S. District Judge James Boasberg, U.S. District Court Judge Paul Engelmayer, U.S. District Court Judge John Bates, U.S. District Court Judge Amir Ali, U.S. District Court Judge John McConnell Jr., U.S. District Court Judge Theodore Chuang, and later, U.S. District Court Judge Charles Breyer. (Technically, Engelmayer is facing two parallel impeachment measures simultaneously.)....
In April, a Marquette University Law School poll found that 70% of Americans opposed impeaching federal judges over anti-Trump rulings. There is, however, often a big gap between what the public wants and what Republican officials decide to do. Watch this space.

FakeNoose
(38,964 posts)

LetMyPeopleVote
(171,106 posts)Dana Bash calling Jim Jordan an attorney is like calling a rodeo clown a neurosurgeon, a viewer said.
âDana Bash calling Jim Jordan an attorney is like calling a rodeo clown a neurosurgeon,â a viewer said.
— The Daily Beast (@thedailybeast.bsky.social) 2025-10-12T15:52:45.921025Z
https://www.thedailybeast.com/cnn-host-fact-checked-after-calling-maga-rep-an-attorney/
The Ohio congressman appeared on State of the Union Sunday, and got into a heated debate with CNN host Bash over the DOJs current warpath against Donald Trumps enemies.
At one point, Bash asked Jordan to put his attorney cap on and consider whether the presidents actions were actually working to undermine the importance of the DOJand while Jordan was happy to take on the attorney role, viewers at home were quick to point out that he had no right to.
While Jordan attended Capital University in Columbus, Ohio, he never sat for the bar exam to become a licensed attorney
Sneederbunk
(16,886 posts)LetMyPeopleVote
(171,106 posts)Jordan is an idiot who was too stupid to pass the bar exam.
'On the table': Jim Jordan opens the door to impeaching judges who restrain Trump
— #TuckFrump (@realtuckfrumper.bsky.social) 2025-10-10T16:28:36.000Z
https://www.rawstory.com/jim-jordan-table-judges/
In an interview with the Washington Times, the blustery Ohio Republican claimed he feels there are also criminal cases that can be made against former high-ranking government officials who have become critics of Trump's policies.
Singling out former CIA director John Brennan he stated, It looks to me like he may have misled Congress. We are looking at that.
As for the balking judges, the Times report notes Jordan explained, The history of our great country has been you dont impeach judges for stupid decisions, or bad decisions, what we, and common sense, would say is a poor decision. But I dont think you should rule out impeachment.
Admitting the way to combat a disputed ruling is through the appeals process, he was quick to point out the high success rate Trump has had with the Supreme Court as a reason not to waste time.