Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

LetMyPeopleVote

(171,280 posts)
Sun Oct 12, 2025, 06:04 PM Sunday

Why Johnson and trump will NOT accept Democrats offer to pass bill to pay troops

The Democrats would be happy to pass a standalone bill to pay troops but trump and Johnson will not agree to this because the House would have to come back

20 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Why Johnson and trump will NOT accept Democrats offer to pass bill to pay troops (Original Post) LetMyPeopleVote Sunday OP
It's all about Epstein. spanone Sunday #1
Besides that, Mike Johnson will probably lose his job FakeNoose Sunday #2
Didn't I just read on Bulwark displacedvermoter Sunday #4
Huh? He's gotten less legislation passed than any other Speaker Wiz Imp Sunday #7
He got the tax cut at the expense of the rest of us. FoxNewsSucks Sunday #11
The Bulwark does not represent billionaires. Wiz Imp Sunday #13
At work so did cursory check displacedvermoter Sunday #14
Thank you. That makes more sense. Wiz Imp Sunday #19
He got their shitty bill passed, that's all they wanted to accomplish FoxNewsSucks Sunday #10
Do it! Gaetz also! rubbersole Sunday #15
Didn't I just read that shithole... Lovie777 Sunday #3
Because it would demonstrate that the GOP caused this shit this time. Because it would display bi-partisenship. ... marble falls Sunday #5
Sorry, but there has to be more to it than that Wiz Imp Sunday #6
I didn't know it was a bill that would become law (I guess I didn't think about it enough), so...Thanks for the info. ancianita Sunday #8
To be fair, I could be wrong, but everything I've read elsewhere supports what I said. Wiz Imp Sunday #16
Thanks for the link on it. ancianita Sunday #17
I think we should be demanding that in event of future shutdowns... Trueblue Texan Sunday #9
Exactly. If they're getting paid during a shutdown, they HAVE to work during the shutdown. ancianita Sunday #18
Why do they hate America? Harker Sunday #12
What is Johnson going to do? videohead5 Sunday #20

FakeNoose

(38,993 posts)
2. Besides that, Mike Johnson will probably lose his job
Sun Oct 12, 2025, 06:14 PM
Sunday

Too many House Repukes are disgusted with him, and they aren't going to give him the Speakership in the next term.
Bring back Kevin McCarthy!

Oh, wait ...

displacedvermoter

(3,953 posts)
4. Didn't I just read on Bulwark
Sun Oct 12, 2025, 06:23 PM
Sunday

that Johnson may be the most successful House Speaker in history? I guess success means different things to different people.

Wiz Imp

(7,679 posts)
7. Huh? He's gotten less legislation passed than any other Speaker
Sun Oct 12, 2025, 08:13 PM
Sunday

and I don't believe it's even remotely close (except for McCarthy). That is the Speaker's primary job - to make sure legislation passes.

For the record, I did a google search and a through review of the Bulwark's website and found nothing of the sort. Do you have a link?

FoxNewsSucks

(11,354 posts)
11. He got the tax cut at the expense of the rest of us.
Sun Oct 12, 2025, 08:29 PM
Sunday

You have to remember that, like tRump, he's NOT working for us. For the billionaires, he's indeed "successful".

Wiz Imp

(7,679 posts)
13. The Bulwark does not represent billionaires.
Sun Oct 12, 2025, 08:46 PM
Sunday

By any objective measure, Johnson has been a terrible Speaker and I would expect the writers at the Bulwark to agree with that.

Those credited with being among the best Speakers ever include:

Sam Rayburn
Henry Clay
Tip O'Neill
Nancy Pelosi
Joseph Cannon

displacedvermoter

(3,953 posts)
14. At work so did cursory check
Sun Oct 12, 2025, 08:48 PM
Sunday

Newsweek, March 25 and Time, August 25.

Apologies to Bulwark.

Typical Time and Newsweek articles, Johnson has to deal with the mutual mistrust and political divisiveness and has done so with abiding faith and blah, blah, blah....

Thanks for steering me straight!

Wiz Imp

(7,679 posts)
19. Thank you. That makes more sense.
Sun Oct 12, 2025, 09:35 PM
Sunday

I just found and read those 2 articles, and while you could say they praised him, they didn't exactly call him the best speaker ever. Newsweek credited him with getting the budget bill passed, but even admitted beyond that, he has left a lot to be desired. And it looks like Time credited him as "Trump's" speaker - basically a rubber stamp for the President. That might be viewed by MAGAs as complimentary, but not so much by the rest of the country.

FoxNewsSucks

(11,354 posts)
10. He got their shitty bill passed, that's all they wanted to accomplish
Sun Oct 12, 2025, 08:27 PM
Sunday

so to the billionaires calling the shots, yes, he's successful.

rubbersole

(10,725 posts)
15. Do it! Gaetz also!
Sun Oct 12, 2025, 08:49 PM
Sunday

MMA in da house! I miss Milktoast McCarthy. Kinda like I miss a good rash.

Lovie777

(20,699 posts)
3. Didn't I just read that shithole...
Sun Oct 12, 2025, 06:17 PM
Sunday

master of Miky Johnson and sole controller of everybody’s money in the universe said that the troops will get paid.

What happened.

marble falls

(68,894 posts)
5. Because it would demonstrate that the GOP caused this shit this time. Because it would display bi-partisenship. ...
Sun Oct 12, 2025, 07:11 PM
Sunday

... Because it would look like weakness to the RW. Because it would be an exception that would become an opening: who will they fund next - FEMA during hurricane season. The CDC during flu and Covid season. Because Putin told him not to.

Supposedly, he's ordered the Pentagon to keep paying the troops out of the budget they already have on hand. Has anyone ever ducked so much responsibility for their own actions on this level ever before in the US?

Wiz Imp

(7,679 posts)
6. Sorry, but there has to be more to it than that
Sun Oct 12, 2025, 08:08 PM
Sunday

Getting the 218th signature on the discharge petition forces a vote on the bill in the House. You would think it would pass because everyone who signed the discharge petition should vote for it. Unfortunately, if and when that happens, it does not come close to forcing the release of the Epstein files. It would still need to pass the Senate and then signed by Trump (which, of course, will never happen). Johnson and every other Republican involved knows this so forcing that vote on the House bill should not be that big of a deal really, because simply passing the House does nothing. So there has to be more to it about why they don't want that vote to happen.

ancianita

(42,298 posts)
8. I didn't know it was a bill that would become law (I guess I didn't think about it enough), so...Thanks for the info.
Sun Oct 12, 2025, 08:25 PM
Sunday

The way you put it convinces me you're right -- there has to be something else behind this. My theory: it's the shutdown Vought's been dreaming of, so that government can be further disabled and destroyed. Why? So that oligarchs can privatize as much as possible, and by any means necessary. They'll move on to the elections and the rest of the military later.

Wiz Imp

(7,679 posts)
16. To be fair, I could be wrong, but everything I've read elsewhere supports what I said.
Sun Oct 12, 2025, 09:19 PM
Sunday

an example:

https://thehill.com/homenews/house/5520512-massie-grijalva-epstein-petition/

The legislation, sponsored by Massie and Rep. Ro Khanna (D-Calif.), would require the DOJ to post, in searchable form, every record the agency possesses related to its investigations into both Epstein, who died by suicide in jail in 2019, and Ghislaine Maxwell, his former girlfriend who is currently serving a 20-year prison sentence for crimes related to the sexual abuse of minors.

Johnson and GOP leaders oppose the legislation, arguing it has little chance of success since it would still have to move through the Senate, and win Trump’s signature, to become law. The Speaker is advocating instead for a separate investigation being led by Rep. James Comer (R-Ky.), the chair of the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee, who has already released thousands of files obtained under subpoena from both the Justice Department and Epstein’s estate.

Trueblue Texan

(3,866 posts)
9. I think we should be demanding that in event of future shutdowns...
Sun Oct 12, 2025, 08:25 PM
Sunday

Congress is not allowed to leave the Capitol building from 9-5 Monday through Friday. If they refuse to negotiate, they can sit around and brain storm for a solution to their impasse with their colleagues, alphabetize their books, sharpen their pencils, or read the Constitution among other useful tasks. Unlike plenty of federal workers who are forced to continue to report to work, they are being paid. They are not being paid to shut down our government then go on a holiday because they don't like the way an election went or because they don't want to go on the record for keeping the Epstein files sealed. They work for us. We should demand they work as hard as we do. No more free rides.

ancianita

(42,298 posts)
18. Exactly. If they're getting paid during a shutdown, they HAVE to work during the shutdown.
Sun Oct 12, 2025, 09:31 PM
Sunday

It's horrible of them to go along with people in the military and FAA and elsewhere still having to work with no pay, while these cowardly toadies are still not working and still getting paid.

videohead5

(2,768 posts)
20. What is Johnson going to do?
Sun Oct 12, 2025, 09:52 PM
Sunday

They can't stay out forever. At some point Johnson will have to call them back.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Why Johnson and trump wil...