General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsShould Dems Boycott SOTU address?
I say yes.
Senate Democrats are having discussions about whether to boycott the event and talked it over during a closed-door lunch this week, according to two people granted anonymity to share details of the private conversations. Some members of the caucus are currently expected to attend, though a swath is undecided.
Personally, Id like to see the solidarity. Theres nothing Chump says that anybody needs or wants to hear anyway.
https://www.dailykos.com/stories/2026/2/16/2369015/-Republicans-Are-Worried-About-the-Optics-of-the-Upcoming-State-of-the-Union-Dems-Should-Be-too
Dave Bowman
(7,169 posts)Trueblue1968
(19,253 posts)Yes yes yes
Ars Longa
(525 posts)with their voters in their respective districts, on SOTU night.
And then contrast that, with the Lying Fascist Poop Trump will be
slinging, only to White Old Man Republicans, on TV!!
It would make a great split-screen!!
JustAnotherGen
(38,056 posts)And they need to be high profile.
Schumer, Durbin, Klobuchar and Booker can attend as representatives of the Senate.
Jeffries and Clark can attend to Represent the House.
leftstreet
(40,709 posts)MustLoveBeagles
(16,432 posts)themaguffin
(5,224 posts)Lovie777
(23,001 posts)all the while lying and making up shit. Once that happens Democrats should walk out. Fetterman and maybe a few house democrats will not.
durablend
(9,272 posts)sheshe2
(97,643 posts)John Fetterman Visits Fox to Give the GOP Advice On How to Keep the Senate Mediaite
— #TuckFrump (@realtuckfrumper.bsky.social) 2026-02-17T18:01:34.000Z
He will be at the SOTU cheering.
rzemanfl
(31,393 posts)Fynoderee
(1 post)Dems should all attend but they should all wear masks like the ICE thugs.
jls4561
(3,124 posts)at the first lie or insult, they pull down the outer mask to reveal one that reads Quiet, piggy!
orangecrush
(30,305 posts)LetMyPeopleVote
(179,906 posts)Easterncedar
(6,279 posts)Easterncedar
(6,279 posts)To recreate Pelosi's gesture of contempt?
Karadeniz
(24,746 posts)Rhiannon12866
(255,627 posts)flvegan
(66,283 posts)Literally listening to the equivalent of a petulant toddler, lying and shitting himself for however long he feels is necessary. Blathering endlessly about nothing of fact, devoid of any reality. All the while every piece of shit republican in attendance falls over themselves with ovation after ovation.
The entire show is pathetic. Vince McMahon would be in awe.
Raven123
(7,807 posts)Dont accept the abuse.
SocialDemocrat61
(7,653 posts)If there are no democrats there, republicans will fill the chamber. There is nothing Trump would like more than to have an audience that applauds and cheers everything he says.
leftstreet
(40,709 posts)SocialDemocrat61
(7,653 posts)But it will just feed Trumps ego and most casual viewers will think democrats are applauding him too. Maybe democrats should attend but sit with their backs to Trump.
dpibel
(3,945 posts)How does that work?
Pretty sure it's a reserved seat gig.
SocialDemocrat61
(7,653 posts)of congress is allowed on the floor of there is room.
Ritabert
(2,450 posts)Can't stand looking at him or listening to him.
bucolic_frolic
(55,166 posts)Laughter might be appropriate too.
bluestarone
(22,188 posts)HELL YES!!!
Frasier Balzov
(5,063 posts)Fiendish Thingy
(23,248 posts)maxsolomon
(38,739 posts)and the nation doesn't collapse.
Sustained, repeated booing and chants of "BS" are entirely appropriate and would be aggressive resistance, not the passive aggression of a boycott.
MyOwnPeace
(17,567 posts)Rent the Kennedy Center and have all Democrats there - give the response speech from there, and have some of the acts that have backed out of their concerts there perform between speeches.
And televise it, opening the auditorium to a free concert,,,,
lame54
(39,772 posts)QueerDuck
(1,727 posts)LetMyPeopleVote
(179,906 posts)Last edited Tue Feb 17, 2026, 04:15 PM - Edit history (1)
I know that I will NOT be watching this speech. I cannot stand listening to trump for even a short period of time
CrispyQ
(40,972 posts)It would be nice to see a BOLD statement from the entire party, not just the outliers.
calimary
(90,053 posts)LuvLoogie
(8,817 posts)Shout "Lie!" every time he does.
Shout "What about the Epstein files?"
Shout "One million!"
ancianita
(43,307 posts)Just one question: what's the "One million!" about?
bsiebs
(959 posts)ancianita
(43,307 posts)LuvLoogie
(8,817 posts)a million times in the files
ancianita
(43,307 posts)OldBaldy1701E
(11,159 posts)Escape
(472 posts)...with their faces redacted.
Torchlight
(6,831 posts)Thus illustrating an obligation for the institution while simultaneously derision for the wee man.
Xavier Breath
(6,644 posts)People need to remember that whatever the Dems do this time the Rethugs will respond in kind to the next Dem president who addresses congress. I know, nobody cares.
hamsterjill
(17,580 posts)Holding pictures of Epstein victims.
I would truly like to see something that makes an unmistakable statement.
Evolve Dammit
(21,779 posts)advent and full throated impementation of secret police with a budget larger than USMC????
bsiebs
(959 posts)edbermac
(16,454 posts)Maybe hell get so enraged that hell have a stroke.
NNadir
(38,074 posts)Rastapopoulos
(747 posts)It could be like a basketball game. Instead of "Air ball, Airball" it should be "Ep-Stein, Ep-Stein" at key points during the speech.
boonecreek
(1,511 posts)I'm boycotting it. Can't stand the sound of his voice.
DownriverDem
(7,014 posts)but I am not watching it. I can't stand seeing him or hearing his voice.
Martin Eden
(15,632 posts)I don't like the idea of catcalls and heckling. Not a good look.
Figarosmom
(12,024 posts)To get people to watch. I will not be watching.
Ping Tung
(4,370 posts)one-by-one ignore him and walk very slowly out. No shouting, no threats, no gestures. Just a dignified display of contempt for the lunatic on stage.
DET
(2,503 posts)If theyre going to boycott or have an organized response, they should show a unified front. We dont need to see or hear Dems in disarray. Same if they decide to show up but walk out.
I understand the gravitas of the SOTU, but if Democrats decide to make a gesture of protest, it should be a bold one. Something that will result in comments like Democrats showed a courageous display of unity at the SOTU, not Democrats weak response was juvenile and pathetic.
durablend
(9,272 posts)No matter what, Fetterman will shit on whatever we do
Aviation Pro
(15,588 posts)And shake them in front of his fucking pedophile, fat face.
boston bean
(36,932 posts)FalloutShelter
(14,473 posts)And each should have a picture of an Epstein victim that they will hold up through the speech.
Force him to overreact and take him off his prepared script
live TV.
Blow the fuse. Maybe he strokes out.
MorbidButterflyTat
(4,520 posts)DinahMoeHum
(23,610 posts)If you stay home, your message stays home with you.
Scrivener7
(59,528 posts)moves either. No going but then walking out, no wearing special protest clothes and then walking out, no mooning him (though I do like that suggestion best!)
He is not worth the effort. Democrats should not grace his nonsense with an audience.
Instead, they should have an alternate SOTU where they tell the truth. There's a lot of emotion to what republicans are doing to people. Have someone make a speech that highlights 20 real Americans and the hell they are in right now. Epstein victims, family members of those murdered or kidnapped by ICE, people who are out of a job, people who can't afford groceries, women who can't get medical care and have a pregnancy nightmare story.
And the speech should connect the dots to show how that hell is viral and coming to us all in one way or another.
vapor2
(4,518 posts)MorbidButterflyTat
(4,520 posts)If Democrats surrender the SOTU to the MAGAts, it will turn into a Piggy/MAGAt rally.
Cowards run away.
senseandsensibility
(24,989 posts)What is the down side? Poll after poll after poll shows that the Dem base wants more action and less business as usual. If our side still worries that it will look bad or "set a precedent" or whatever nonsense they are living in a dream world. I was all for them boycotting the first speech a year ago, but my Dem congresswoman was not open to the idea at all. It seems that they have learned nothing in a year.
Sorry, but I assume that there is no chance of this happening, although I would love to be proven wrong.
biocube
(217 posts)...and throw tomatoes at him.
Wiz Imp
(10,002 posts)Sure, some will not attend, but there is zero chance of most boycotting. Besides, it would accomplish nothing. Why people here think it would be this great thing, I'll never understand. 98% of the population couldn't care less.
Ilikepurple
(682 posts)I cant believe the MSM keeps hiding these concrete numbers from us. I believe there is a vanishingly small but non zero chance most will do this. I see zero chance bandied about too casually for my tastes. The only rhetorical reason I can see to assign zero probability to an idea that has a non zero chance of occurring is to make person considering it feel foolish.
Ill also remember that it is pointless to ask any questions that are not likely to happen. No more thought experiments? Sometimes entertaining possible but improbable scenarios (I forgot here we have an impossible scenario) can give us insights into our thoughts and understanding of a matter. I see no issue with discussing this matter every year as one year there may be a non zero chance of a boycott and then I hope our opinions mights matter. Im not even sure I disagree with your assessment, but Id like to be able to consider it without being told that one position is so beyond reason it would be folly to consider the question. Your knowledge and understanding is valuable here, so Im disappointed when I feel you could make your point less dismissively.
orangecrush
(30,305 posts)ThreeNoSeep
(306 posts)Boycott?
Heck no. Shut that flapping rectum face down.
Tree Lady
(13,283 posts)Every time he says a lie hold up hundreds of signs saying liar, maybe even criminal.
hunter
(40,695 posts)In this universe maybe they could all wear hearing protection because everything Trump says is shit.
Personally, Trump's voice makes my skin crawl. I avoid all media where I might hear it.
![]()
wikipedia
Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin
(135,774 posts)IcyPeas
(25,479 posts)We're supposed to be polite?
He is a piece of shit.
(I like the idea of shouting "Liar" or "Murderer" or "Pedophile" or whatever phrase fits)
rampartd
(4,634 posts)as a saddam hussien level example of his authority.
betsuni
(29,080 posts)I thought that was bad. Or to people who don't pay attention to politics, evidence that it's Democrats who refuse to work with Republicans, that both sides are extreme.
The difference between the parties is startling, clearly good vs evil like in a movie. Show the American people. Maybe a few will be watching.
Democrats should have a big boozy dance party after to purify themselves.
StoolPigeon
(260 posts)Some of Epstein's victims are planning to be in attendance so any actions along those lines should be respectful of them. Personally, I prefer the attend and walk out plan. But I would arrange it so that one person left at a time, about one every 10 seconds and in order by where they are sitting.
As for myself, I would be watching except I plan on being busy watching paint dry.
Roc2020
(1,787 posts)and simply stare at him. No clapping no standing. Just stare at him stone faced. The files will be playing in his mind like a violin.
travelingthrulife
(5,192 posts)Greybnk48
(10,727 posts)gulliver
(13,986 posts)Hopefully, whoever had the brilliant idea of using the little signs last year has been sent to the corner with a conical cap. We need to get the House, and it's not in the bag. Elissa Slotkin gave an excellent response to the SOTU last year. Let's hope we follow that up with more like it, not the silly stuff.