Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsFurious Trump wants 'rehearing' after 'highly disappointing' Supreme Court defeat
trump really does not want to refund the illegal tariffs
President Donald Trump lashed out at the Supreme Court again on Friday, questioning whether a "Rehearing or Readjudication" is possible after the justices dealt a devastating blow to his tariff agenda one week ago.
— Raw Story (@rawstory.com) 2026-02-28T02:00:21Z
https://www.rawstory.com/trump-supreme-court-2675368843
President Donald Trump lashed out at the Supreme Court again on Friday, questioning whether a Rehearing or Readjudication is possible after the justices dealt a devastating blow to his tariff agenda one week ago.
In a lengthy post on Truth Social, Trump claimed the ruling could allow for Hundreds of Billions of Dollars to be returned to Countries and Companies that have been ripping off the United States of America for many years."
"And now, according to this Decision, could actually continue to do so, at an even increased level, he argued. I am sure that the Supreme Court did not have this in mind!
It doesnt make sense that Countries and Companies that took advantage of us for decades, receiving Billions and Billions of Dollars that they should not have been allowed to receive, would now be entitled to an undeserved windfall, the likes of which the World has never seen before," Trump added.
The president insisted the high court could not have intended such an outcome and called the decision highly disappointing, to say the least. He then added: Is a Rehearing or Readjudication of this case possible???
In a lengthy post on Truth Social, Trump claimed the ruling could allow for Hundreds of Billions of Dollars to be returned to Countries and Companies that have been ripping off the United States of America for many years."
"And now, according to this Decision, could actually continue to do so, at an even increased level, he argued. I am sure that the Supreme Court did not have this in mind!
It doesnt make sense that Countries and Companies that took advantage of us for decades, receiving Billions and Billions of Dollars that they should not have been allowed to receive, would now be entitled to an undeserved windfall, the likes of which the World has never seen before," Trump added.
The president insisted the high court could not have intended such an outcome and called the decision highly disappointing, to say the least. He then added: Is a Rehearing or Readjudication of this case possible???
4 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Furious Trump wants 'rehearing' after 'highly disappointing' Supreme Court defeat (Original Post)
LetMyPeopleVote
Feb 28
OP
tanyev
(49,312 posts)1. Lost a case in the rough? Just get Dan Scavino to pull another one out of his pocket
and drop it on the green court for you.
😒
Blue Owl
(59,132 posts)2. Quiet, war piggy
LetMyPeopleVote
(179,960 posts)3. Trump loses appeal to delay Supreme Court's tariff smackdown
trump really wants to keep the tariff money and is trying to delay the refunds
#Tariffs #TariffRefunds
— Eliz PhotoClique (@elizphotoclique.bsky.social) 2026-03-02T18:23:35.937Z
Trump loses appeal to delay Supreme Court's tariff smackdown www.rawstory.com/appeals-cour...
https://www.rawstory.com/appeals-court-rejects-trump-tariffs/
President Donald Trump and his administration lost an appeal that would have delayed a Supreme Court ruling striking down the authority to impose emergency tariffs.
In a ruling issued on Monday, the Federal Circuit Court of Appeals rejected a Trump administration bid to delay the effective date of the Supreme Court's tariff ruling by 90 days.
The court granted the appellees' motion for "immediate issuance of the mandates" imposed by the Supreme Court. In doing so, it also denied a "cross-motion to stay the issuance of the mandates."
"The mandates shall issue forthwith," the court said.
Last month, the Supreme Court struck down sweeping tariffs imposed unilaterally by the president. By a 6-3 vote, the high court said Trump had illegally imposed the tariffs.
In a ruling issued on Monday, the Federal Circuit Court of Appeals rejected a Trump administration bid to delay the effective date of the Supreme Court's tariff ruling by 90 days.
The court granted the appellees' motion for "immediate issuance of the mandates" imposed by the Supreme Court. In doing so, it also denied a "cross-motion to stay the issuance of the mandates."
"The mandates shall issue forthwith," the court said.
Last month, the Supreme Court struck down sweeping tariffs imposed unilaterally by the president. By a 6-3 vote, the high court said Trump had illegally imposed the tariffs.
LetMyPeopleVote
(179,960 posts)4. Neal Katyal-The Court in our tariffs case has just rejected the Government's delay tactic with tariff refunds.
