General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsA medical journal says the case reports it has published for 25 years are, in fact, fiction
https://retractionwatch.com/2026/03/03/canadian-pediatric-society-journal-correction-case-reports-fictional-paediatrics-child-health/Paediatrics & Child Health, the journal of the Canadian Paediatric Society, has published the cases since 2000 in articles for a series for its Canadian Paediatric Surveillance Program. The articles usually start with a case description followed by "learning points" that include statistics, clinical observations and data from CPSP. The peer-reviewed articles don't state anywhere the cases described are fictional.
The corrections come following a January article in New Yorker magazine that mentioned one of the reports -- "Baby boy blue," a case published in 2010 describing an infant who showed signs of opioid exposure via breast milk while his mother was taking acetaminophen with codeine. The New Yorker article made public an admission by one of the coauthors that the case was made up.
"Based on the New Yorker article, we made the decision to add a correction notice to all 138 publications drawing attention to CPSP studies and surveys to clarify that the cases are fictional," Joan Robinson, editor-in-chief of Paediatrics & Child Health, told Retraction Watch. "From now on, the body of the case report will specifically state that the case is fictional."
. . .
As this article states, a lot of follow-on research has been done based on these fictional histories.
It's not just AI that is making things up.
Tasmanian Devil
(124 posts)Wow. Just amazing.
Easterncedar
(6,031 posts)The bottom line was that a child was probably murdered, and no one was charged.
Earthrise
(15,748 posts)The fictionalized case present a variety of symptoms that typically dont all occur in any one patient.
I think what I am seeing here is lack of science/medical knowledge on the part of the New Yorker journalist, fact checkers, and editors.
erronis
(23,465 posts)I don't know (obviously) the protocol for these types of articles, but just as in many documentaries there could be a statement such as "The characters represented are not those in real life...."
Thanks for your insights.
Earthrise
(15,748 posts)I know that Ive read enough of these in books that I assume any case discussed at the start of an article or book chapter is fictionalized - for the privacy of individuals whove been treated as well as the desire to create a vivid example that combines a variety of symptoms. Unless I see a statement that says that the case is real and identifying information has been changed to protect the clients privacy I assume the case is fictionalized.
GreatGazoo
(4,544 posts)They have thousands to choose from.
Earthrise
(15,748 posts)I know that Ive read enough of these in books that I assume any case discussed at the start of an article or book chapter is fictionalized - for the privacy of individuals whove been treated as well as the desire to create a vivid example that combines a variety of symptoms. Unless I see a statement that says that the case is real and identifying information has been changed to protect the clients privacy I assume the case is fictionalized.
Tasmanian Devil
(124 posts)I guess HIPAA and the difficulties of data anonymization makes this a reasonable thing to do. And those of us outside medicine need to adjust assumptions.