Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

senseandsensibility

(24,973 posts)
Tue Mar 31, 2026, 04:57 PM 12 hrs ago

Breaking from Ron FIlipkowski: Trump will steal midterms with an unconstitutional order Update: He did it!

Last edited Tue Mar 31, 2026, 06:05 PM - Edit history (2)

The scoop comes from Daily Caller, so I won't link it here. Apparently, according to Ron "With new polls showing a Doomsday Scenario for Republicans int the midterms, Trump escalates efforts to try and steal the midterms with an unconstitutional and illegal order."

He will sign an executive order at 5 pm cracking down on mail-in voting across the country, Daily Caller has learned.

I don't know if DC is accurate, but I don't doubt that trump would try this.

Edited to add that he did it. Guess the Daily Caller was accurate this time.

7 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Breaking from Ron FIlipkowski: Trump will steal midterms with an unconstitutional order Update: He did it! (Original Post) senseandsensibility 12 hrs ago OP
But it's ok for him to vote by mail? mwmisses4289 12 hrs ago #1
Of course it is senseandsensibility 12 hrs ago #2
Well, he is iimportant, you know. niyad 12 hrs ago #3
I wouldn't believe anything from the Daily Caller Wiz Imp 12 hrs ago #4
He's bloviating about signing it right now senseandsensibility 11 hrs ago #5
I expect the Red States will use the ' executive order ' , which he likes authority to issue. Bread and Circuses 11 hrs ago #6
Democracy Docket-Trump signs sweeping order attacking mail-in voting LetMyPeopleVote 10 hrs ago #7

senseandsensibility

(24,973 posts)
2. Of course it is
Tue Mar 31, 2026, 05:00 PM
12 hrs ago

because he's "busy" (golfing and planning ballrooms with taxpayer money). Jeez.

Wiz Imp

(9,991 posts)
4. I wouldn't believe anything from the Daily Caller
Tue Mar 31, 2026, 05:14 PM
12 hrs ago

Regardless, he may try to do something like that but it won't work. States can safely ignore it

Bread and Circuses

(2,045 posts)
6. I expect the Red States will use the ' executive order ' , which he likes authority to issue.
Tue Mar 31, 2026, 06:11 PM
11 hrs ago

That will give republicans cover to deny the vote to people. I wonder if Republican counties in Blue States will do the same. Or if Blue state governors can stop it ? I don’t know. I think we need to watch this closely,

Thanks

LetMyPeopleVote

(179,822 posts)
7. Democracy Docket-Trump signs sweeping order attacking mail-in voting
Tue Mar 31, 2026, 06:56 PM
10 hrs ago

This executive order will be struck down



https://www.democracydocket.com/news-alerts/trump-signs-sweeping-order-attacking-mail-in-voting/

Under the Constitution, states run elections and only Congress can set national standards.

This is a massive and unconstitutional voter suppression effort aimed at giving Trump the power to create a list of who is allowed to vote by mail,” Marc Elias, founder of Democracy Docket, said Tuesday. “We know where this will go — the targeting of Democrats for mass disenfranchisement. We will sue and we will win.”

Legal challenges to the new order are expected swiftly.

“It’s obvious the president didn’t learn anything from his first failed executive order,” David Becker, a leading election law expert, told Democracy Docket. “This is unconstitutional on its face. The Constitution clearly gives the president no power over elections.”

Becker said he expects courts to move quickly to block the order, as they did with earlier attempts.

“I expect that this will be blocked by multiple federal courts in a very short period of time and have no legal effect whatsoever,” he said.

He also pointed to contradictions between the administration’s recent legal arguments and the apparent scope of the new order, particularly around the creation of a national voter list.

“After the Department of Justice has been telling courts they’re not creating a national voter list, this appears to confirm exactly what courts were concerned about,” Becker said.
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Breaking from Ron FIlipko...