Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

dalton99a

(95,538 posts)
Wed May 27, 2026, 04:25 PM 6 hrs ago

What 370,000 College Essays Tell Us About A.I.'s Effects on Creativity

https://www.nytimes.com/2026/05/27/opinion/writing-creativity-ai.html

What 370,000 College Essays Tell Us About A.I.’s Effects on Creativity
May 27, 2026
By Rebecca Winthrop

...

For the past eight years, the Georgetown University neuroscientist Adam Green has been leading a national research team tracking the range of novel ideas that college-bound high school students present in their application essays, before and after the introduction of ChatGPT. In one study, he and his team examined personal statements from more than 370,000 students, and found that after ChatGPT became available, their essays suddenly used diverse and colorful language, but lacked truly creative ideas. And the linguistic coverup worked; post-ChatGPT essays were rated as more “creative” by human judges, even if the substance of the essays trod familiar territory.

In a separate study, the team found that human-written essays offered up to eight times more new ideas than those produced by A.I.

Another experiment run by a different research team compared short stories written by humans to those written with A.I. assistance. As with the student essays in Dr. Green’s study, A.I.-assisted works had more interesting vocabulary and were rated more enjoyable to read, but the underlying story lines were more homogeneous. Distinctive and offbeat ideas — with surprising characters or unusual settings — are often shunted to the side when A.I. is involved.

For the first time in human history, we have a technology that can generate words separately from the thoughts they represent. When a chatbot writes, it is predicting the next word that is most likely to make a “good” sentence or essay, based on the text it’s been trained on. It can identify sophisticated and creative word patterns independently of whether the underlying ideas represent something new.

...





4 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
What 370,000 College Essays Tell Us About A.I.'s Effects on Creativity (Original Post) dalton99a 6 hrs ago OP
If colleges/universities are going to allow AI for written papers and tests, no_hypocrisy 4 hrs ago #1
Yes, Bring back the blue books for in class writing in a paper. n/t Jacson6 3 hrs ago #3
If I was in college today... Jacson6 3 hrs ago #2
It isn't cheating to edit something you wrote using a word processor. Btw, iMacs weren't introduced till 1998. highplainsdem 1 hr ago #4

no_hypocrisy

(55,467 posts)
1. If colleges/universities are going to allow AI for written papers and tests,
Wed May 27, 2026, 06:46 PM
4 hrs ago

then they also must include a dissertation where students have to orally explain their thesis in detail. Even asking them the definition of $50 words.

Jacson6

(2,226 posts)
2. If I was in college today...
Wed May 27, 2026, 07:01 PM
3 hrs ago

I would use AI for research today, but I would write the paper myself with proper references. I sort of cheated 40 yrs ago when I used an iMac to write my college papers and then easily changed them to edit them. Hey I got an A so it wasn't so bad!



highplainsdem

(63,244 posts)
4. It isn't cheating to edit something you wrote using a word processor. Btw, iMacs weren't introduced till 1998.
Wed May 27, 2026, 09:17 PM
1 hr ago

My first experience with word processing was four decades, using WordStar on an Osborne.

You'd be unwise to use AI for research now, since you'd have to check its results so carefully you wouldn't save much time. There was a big story last week about a well known author who'd been foolish enough to trust AI for research:

Book on Truth in the Age of A.I. Contains Quotes Made Up by A.I.
https://www.democraticunderground.com/10143667143

Even if you correct all the mistakes in research done by AI, wiping out much of the time supposedly saved, you'll have allowed a chatbot to narrow down what you find, and missed out on new and interesting information you might have run across.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»What 370,000 College Essa...