Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

kentuck

(115,949 posts)
Tue Jun 16, 2026, 06:55 PM Tuesday

About that B-52?

Was it headed to the G-7 conference?

Was it carrying materiel to be used by Donald Trump while he was there?

What was the cargo?

Reportedly, several important officials, including defense contractors, were on board.

18 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

68er

(36 posts)
2. Ironic indeed if defense contractors perished in one of the tax-subsidized socialized devices....
Tue Jun 16, 2026, 07:00 PM
Tuesday

... that made them privately rich.

RockRaven

(19,984 posts)
3. I heard it was a test flight, as the B-52 fleet is being upgraded with new various equipment/instruments.
Tue Jun 16, 2026, 07:05 PM
Tuesday

But I didn't look into it myself.

Cirsium

(4,205 posts)
5. I used to see them
Tue Jun 16, 2026, 07:46 PM
Tuesday

I used to see B52 test flights there quite a bit. They did touch and go and flew low level tight circles.

VGNonly

(8,595 posts)
6. The usual crew is 5:
Tue Jun 16, 2026, 07:58 PM
Tuesday

pilot, copilot, navigator, weapons system officer and an electronic warfare officer. It can fly about 8,800 miles combat range, 10,100 ferry range, without refueling. 744 were built from 1955-63, 76 remain in service with about 12 in long time storage. With constant upgrades and continuous repairs, they are expected to be in service until 2050.

I saw them fly in the 90s at Wurtsmith AFB in Michigan during the Gulf War.

2naSalit

(104,550 posts)
8. After some thought...
Tue Jun 16, 2026, 08:03 PM
Tuesday

I am left wondering if there were missiles or some other ordinance on board, it sure blew up real good, there wasn't anything left but ash and a few chunks of who knows what. You'd think there would be some bigger chunks left.

sarisataka

(22,979 posts)
10. Fuel.
Tue Jun 16, 2026, 08:13 PM
Tuesday

It makes planes blow up real good, especially when their full such as just after takeoff.

malaise

(299,271 posts)
11. Take off with full fuel tanks is the most dangerous time for any flight
Tue Jun 16, 2026, 08:23 PM
Tuesday

let alone an aircraft of this size.

sarisataka

(22,979 posts)
9. It was making a flight to test a new radar
Tue Jun 16, 2026, 08:12 PM
Tuesday

that is why there were contractors aboard.

Why on earth would someone use one of the most recognizable bombers in the world as a cargo plane?

LeftInTX

(34,905 posts)
18. Sad that it happened on such an innocuous flight
Wed Jun 17, 2026, 07:44 AM
Yesterday

I doubt that the new radar was factor, but you never know.

I don't live too far from former Kelly Air Force Base, it was the home of C5 maintenance and they still do maintenance on C5s and other large cargo.

The huge planes literally fly in low circles, up to 10 miles from the base. It would be tragic if one of them crashed.

Happy Hoosier

(9,703 posts)
13. Edwards is a test base.
Tue Jun 16, 2026, 10:02 PM
Tuesday

They were testing an upgrade to the aircraft. I do the same kind of work. I am thinking of the family of the aircrews and flight test engineers who died in that crash.

Fichefinder

(451 posts)
15. I am also an Aircraft Modification tech. It is dangerous work.
Wed Jun 17, 2026, 12:55 AM
Yesterday

Everything has to be correct and by the book or people die.

Ilsa

(64,720 posts)
16. When I watch Air Disasters, it shocks me when the
Wed Jun 17, 2026, 01:00 AM
Yesterday

investigators conclude that something like an improper bolt was used, leading to the death of dozens.

Response to kentuck (Original post)

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»About that B-52?