Tens of thousands of fired federal workers must be reinstated immediately, judge rules
Source: Politico
03/13/2025 12:35 PM EDT
A federal judge on Thursday ordered federal agencies to reinstate tens of thousands of probationary employees who were fired amid President Donald Trump's turbulent effort to drastically shrink the federal bureaucracy.
U.S. District Judge William Alsup described the mass firings as a "sham" strategy by the government's central human resources office to sidestep legal requirements for reducing the federal workforce.
Alsup, a San Francisco-based appointee of President Bill Clinton, ordered the Departments of Defense, Treasury, Energy, Agriculture and Veterans Affairs to "immediately" offer all fired probationary employees their jobs back. The Office of Personnel Management, the judge said, had made an "unlawful" decision to terminate them.
The order is one of the most far-reaching rejections of the Trump administration's effort to slash the bureaucracy and is almost certain to be appealed.
Read more: https://www.politico.com/news/2025/03/13/fired-federal-probationary-employees-court-ruling-00228721
Just breaking. Short article at post time.
Interesting part from CNN's article -
By Devan Cole, CNN
Updated 12:52 PM EDT, Thu March 13, 2025
(snip)
The ruling came after Alsup unloaded on the Justice Department for not making the acting head of the Office of Personnel Management available to testify about the Trump administrations decision to fire scores of probationary employees. He had ordered acting OMB director Charles Ezell to testify Thursday, where he would likely face tough questions from attorneys representing labor unions and others that are challenging his agencys role in the firings.
But the Justice Department refused to make him available and instead withdrew a declaration Ezell submitted last month that had served as the governments only evidence in the case. Youre afraid to do so because you know cross-examination will reveal the truth, Alsup told DOJ attorney Kelsey Helland. I tend to doubt that youre telling me the truth.
Alsup told the DOJ attorney Thursday: You cant just say, heres a declaration, you have to accept it without question when there is a question. Youre not helping me get at the truth. Youre giving me press releases sham documents, the judge said, referring to documents submitted by the DOJ to the court that they say shows how the agencies were making the termination decisions themselves.
The declaration from Ezell said that OPM did not direct other agencies to terminate probationary employees the central issue in the case brought by labor unions and others. But Alsup has already said that the evidence in the case points in favor of the plaintiffs, and hes cast doubt on the Justice Departments argument that various federal agencies fired probationary employees because of their own decision-making.
(snip)

republianmushroom
(19,581 posts)NotHardly
(2,072 posts)if we are at the point the Criminal Empire and ignore the court orders. Sh*t met fan.
XanaDUer2
(15,728 posts)Ford_Prefect
(8,345 posts)tonekat
(2,204 posts)They had a lot of probationary new hires fired too.
BumRushDaShow
(151,210 posts)This was an earlier case.
There was a suit filed a couple days ago that covered HHS -
By Daniel Wiessner
March 11, 2025 3:22 PM EDT Updated 2 days ago
March 11 (Reuters) - A group of U.S. government employees who lost their jobs as part of President Donald Trump's purge of the federal workforce filed a lawsuit on Tuesday claiming the mass firings of recently-hired workers is illegal and should be reversed. The proposed class action in Washington, D.C. federal court appears to be the first of its kind against the Trump administration by probationary government employees, who typically have spent less than a year in their current roles and have fewer job protections than other federal workers.
Unions that have sued over the mass firings of thousands of probationary workers are facing procedural hurdles, and Tuesday's lawsuit says political turmoil at the board that hears federal workers' appeals of their terminations may render that process futile.
"What is needed is for this court to order the defendant agencies to return all affected employees to work for at least the pendency of this litigation," the plaintiffs said in the complaint.
(snip)
The lawsuit was filed by eight probationary employees who were fired over the last few weeks and are seeking to represent a class of more than 4,000 people at the five agencies where they worked. They claim the mass firings violated workers' due process rights under the U.S. Constitution and were improper because agencies did not identify performance issues on a case-by-case basis or give workers an opportunity to respond.
The plaintiffs worked at the Department of Veterans Affairs, the Department of Health and Human Services, the Treasury Department, the Commerce Department, and the General Services Administration.
(snip)
Also earlier "class action" with some other agencies - https://www.democraticunderground.com/10143411938
Abstractartist
(226 posts)And then what? Probationary employees will then be fired in 90 days. They will come up with bullshit reasons. The left in congress MUST vote against anything coming up for vote and Senate must filibuster to get 60 vote for passage
. This shit must stop.
DEMOCRATS IN CONGRESS
TIME TO GROW A PAIR AND QUIT BRINGING A STICK TO A GUN FIGHT
..HELP YOUR CONSTITUENTS OR STEP DOWN AND GET OUT.
LetMyPeopleVote
(162,013 posts)These firings were all in violation of the Reduction in Force Act. This judge is really pissed at the DOJ and is accusing them of lying
Link to tweet
https://www.washingtonpost.com/dc-md-va/2025/03/13/trump-probationary-federal-worker-firings-judge-ruling/
Judge William Alsup said at a hearing in U.S. District Court in San Francisco that OPM which serves as the federal governments human resources agency had no legal authority to direct the mass firings in phone calls and written communications last month. He added that individual agencies could follow the steps laid out in a federal law called the Reduction in Force Act to pare back their staffs.
The ruling marked the most significant challenge so far to President Donald Trumps effort to shrink and reshape the sprawling, 2.3-million person federal workforce. Alsup also extended a temporary restraining order he had granted last month to a group of labor unions and advocacy groups who sued over the terminations.
This judge is accusing the DOJ of lying and presenting false documents
I tend to doubt that youre telling me the truth, Alsup told Assistant U.S. Attorney Kelsey Helland, the lone Justice Department lawyer at the hearing.
You will not bring the people here to be cross-examined, the judge said. Youre afraid to do so, because it would reveal the truth. This is the U.S. District Court. Ive been practicing or serving in this court for over 50 years, and I know how we get to the truth.
Lying to a federal judge is never a good idea
GiqueCee
(2,143 posts)Well, Judge Alsup, as you say, you've been at this for 50 years and change, and you're starting to get the hang of it, so I'm sure you know that, if a Republican's lips are moving, it is lying. Truth is to a Republican as water is to the Wicked Witch of the West. But, sadly, they do not melt.
LetMyPeopleVote
(162,013 posts)You do not lie or try to mislead a federal judge. This judge is pissed
https://bsky.app/profile/dwilliams1210.bsky.social/post/3lkbl2qvhk22i
Link to tweet
https://www.rawstory.com/william-alsup-trump-lawyers/
At a hearing on Thursday, Alsup became angry after acting Office of Personnel Management (OPM) Director Charles Ezell refused an order to testify on the Trump administration's mass firings. The case was brought in February by the American Federation of Government Employees.
"You will not bring the people in here to be cross-examined. You're afraid to do so because you know cross-examination would reveal the truth," the judge told government lawyers, according to Slate's Mark Joseph Stern.
"I tend to doubt that you're telling me the truth whenever we hear all the evidence eventually. Why can't you bring your people in to be cross-examined or deposed at their convenience?" he continued. "I said two hours for Mr. Ezell. A deposition at his convenience. And you withdrew his declaration rather than do that? Come on. That's a sham. It upsets me, I want you to know that."
"I've been practicing in this court for over 50 years and I know how we get at the truth. And you're not helping me get at the truth. You're giving me press releases, sham documents. I'm getting mad."
brakester
(332 posts)the rubber meets the road. Finally a group of educated and morally upright officials that believe in Truth! How refreshing!!!
One question, though, the judge stated, "Ive been practicing or serving in this court for over 50 years, and I know how we get to the truth.
How come he didn't order the LEOs to bring Ezell to his courtroom or send him to jail to cool his jets?
So, did Alsup really get to the Truth?
twodogsbarking
(13,430 posts)DENVERPOPS
(11,848 posts)that for decades, the Republicans have been stuffing the "Appellate" courts with appointed Judges who are hard core Republicans.....
NJCher
(39,859 posts)It's more a 50/50 type of situation.
snip
As of January 2, 2025, of the 179 Courts of Appeals judges, 89 were appointed by Republican presidents, and 88 by Democratic presidents. Out of the 13 federal appeals courts, Democratic appointees have a majority on 7 courts, whereas Republican appointees have a majority on 6 courts.[4]
snip
above from Wikipedia.
I'm not aware of any study that guages whether a republic judge is "hard core." If you would, please, advise me of the attitudinal study for that statement.
BumRushDaShow
(151,210 posts)We have spent the past couple years seeing case after case of GOP loons specifically going to that same one set of Districts under the 5th Circuit.
But now you are seeing Democrats going to the Districts under OTHER Appellate jurisdictions (1st & 9th, along with D.C.).
wordstroken
(1,094 posts)
twodogsbarking
(13,430 posts)Boss don't wanna hear that shit though.
Initech
(104,542 posts)
Bristlecone
(10,688 posts)elleng
(139,224 posts)ACTION!!!
pfitz59
(11,459 posts)and stop these mean judges from over-ruling his orders.
BumRushDaShow
(151,210 posts)
elocs
(24,106 posts)How?