Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

BumRushDaShow

(151,209 posts)
Thu Apr 17, 2025, 07:21 AM Apr 17

Trump DOJ opposes letting Jan. 6 defendant 'examine and publish' footage, evidence and discovery surrounding Capitol

Source: Law & Crime

Apr 16th, 2025, 7:43 pm


A Jan. 6 defendant from Texas who ran for Congress last year and is reportedly attempting another political run has been granted permission to “examine and publish” footage, evidence and discovery from his criminal case surrounding the events of the 2021 Capitol attack — but the Justice Department says not so fast.

Ryan Zink, 35, of Lubbock, was granted access last week by U.S. District Judge James Boasberg on account of the DOJ not filing a memorandum in opposition to Zink’s March 22 motion to lift a protective order keeping his case material sealed. Boasberg issued a minute order on April 9 announcing his decision, which the DOJ apparently saw and responded to Wednesday with the document in question.

“As the Government has not opposed Defendant’s Motion to Lift Protective Order, the Court orders that the Motion is granted, and the Protective Order is lifted,” a docket entry from Boasberg said last week. In response, the DOJ’s top prosecutor in Washington, D.C., Ed Martin, signed off on a memorandum in opposition Wednesday that said granting such a request to Zink would put people at risk and pose a threat to national security.

“Lifting a protective order in this case creates a dangerous opportunity and could potentially place sensitive information in the possession of those who would use it to harm the national security, in addition to allowing terabytes of information including individual defendants’, witnesses’, and victims’ personal identifying information to be released to the public,” Martin said. “The government has thus demonstrated that release of these materials could cause a significant hazard to others, and there is no prejudice to the defendant from continuing the protective order here.”

Read more: https://lawandcrime.com/high-profile/creates-a-dangerous-opportunity-trump-doj-opposes-letting-jan-6-defendant-examine-and-publish-footage-evidence-and-discovery-surrounding-capitol-attack/



Full headline: ‘Creates a dangerous opportunity’: Trump DOJ opposes letting Jan. 6 defendant ‘examine and publish’ footage, evidence and discovery surrounding Capitol attack

They are continually trying to ERASE the history of January 6th and don't want "reminders" to appear.
4 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Trump DOJ opposes letting Jan. 6 defendant 'examine and publish' footage, evidence and discovery surrounding Capitol (Original Post) BumRushDaShow Apr 17 OP
The trump "INSURRECTION", nothing else will do. republianmushroom Apr 17 #1
At least now it appears Figarosmom Apr 17 #2
It's available on YouTube and the media companies also have footage. kimbutgar Apr 17 #3
From what I understand from previous stories that were related to cases like this BumRushDaShow Apr 17 #4

Figarosmom

(5,297 posts)
2. At least now it appears
Thu Apr 17, 2025, 12:48 PM
Apr 17

They have figured out that the footage is actually damning. All that time that the republican Congress was fighting to gave it released thinking trump was right and it would show " a day of love and peace" .

kimbutgar

(24,904 posts)
3. It's available on YouTube and the media companies also have footage.
Thu Apr 17, 2025, 02:50 PM
Apr 17

And it will hard to deny what we saw on TV that day and say it was a peaceful demonstration. And I actually have a recorded show showing those insurrectionists on my DVR!

BumRushDaShow

(151,209 posts)
4. From what I understand from previous stories that were related to cases like this
Thu Apr 17, 2025, 03:10 PM
Apr 17

is that there is apparently "internal" Capitol footage that hasn't been released or at least "shown" publicly. The J6 Committee might have some of it but has generally only released what was relevant to "telling the story" of what happened, since there were so many cameras and so much footage.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Trump DOJ opposes letting...