Two major law firms urge judges to permanently block Trump's executive orders
Source: AP
Updated 4:52 PM EDT, April 23, 2025
WASHINGTON (AP) Two major law firms asked separate judges Wednesday to permanently block President Donald Trumps executive orders that were meant to punish them and harm their business operations. The firms Perkins Coie and WilmerHale say the orders imposed in March are unconstitutional assaults on the legal profession that threaten their relationships with clients and retaliate against them based either on their past legal representations or their association with particular attorneys whom Trump perceives as his adversaries.
Courts last month temporarily halted enforcement of key provisions of both orders, but the firms asked in court Wednesday for the edicts to be struck down in their entirety and for judges to issue rulings in their favor.
Another firm, Jenner & Block, is scheduled to make similar arguments next week and a fourth, Susman Godfrey, is set to make its case next month. The entire executive order is retaliatory, Dane Butswinkas, a lawyer who presented arguments on behalf of Perkins Coie, told a judge.
U.S. District Judge Beryl Howell did not immediately rule on the firms request, but she repeatedly expressed deep unease over the executive order, signaling that she was inclined to side with Perkins Coie.
Read more: https://apnews.com/article/trump-law-firms-perkins-coie-wilmerhale-7dba5f0c38ac547bf3f2bb1f31a2ef38

J_William_Ryan
(2,671 posts)Trump the fascist authoritarian using the power of the state to attack perceived political enemies; Trumps attacks are not only un-Constitutional, but theyre also illegal, the actions of a fascist thug.
chouchou
(1,781 posts)..Better stop them from knowing !!!
mdbl
(6,279 posts)He isn't competent.
LetMyPeopleVote
(161,988 posts)This did not go well for the DOJ attorney
Skittles
(163,581 posts)why don't all band together and FIGHT this fascist bullshit???
BumRushDaShow
(151,198 posts)Because under normal circumstances, they are "rivals" of each other. Only when you have something like this that they realize threatens the entire field, do they finally set the rivalry aside and band together.
Skittles
(163,581 posts)why are ANY of them submitting to something even the CATO INSTITUTE calls UNCONSTITUTIONAL
BumRushDaShow
(151,198 posts)as they come out of their zombified states and wake up.
You see the same thing FINALLY happening with the colleges/universities.
It seems the "cave" sentiment has been coming from someone "at the top" of those institutions (law firms or schools or media outlets), where others in there seem to initially defer to them... until they realize how a bad deal it was, and are now starting to protest.
LetMyPeopleVote
(161,988 posts)President Donald Trumps efforts to target law firms he doesnt like arent faring well in court.
https://bsky.app/profile/gypsydaveh.bsky.social/post/3lnj67sf57c2o
Link to tweet
https://www.msnbc.com/deadline-white-house/deadline-legal-blog/judge-howell-perkins-coie-lawsuit-temper-tantrum-trump-rcna202681
Howell previously granted a temporary restraining order to Perkins Coie, which had argued that Trumps executive order targeting the firm was unprecedented and unconstitutional from top to bottom. The presidents March 6 order cited the firms dishonest and dangerous activity stemming from its association with figures loathed in GOP circles: Hillary Clinton and George Soros. The order sought to restrict the firms access to federal buildings and instructed agencies not to engage with its personnel and to terminate contracts held by firm clients.
Howell had previously told government officials to send a memo to agencies telling them about the restraining order. But she didnt like how they went about it in calling her order erroneous. NBC News reported that the Obama appointee said that it struck her as a temper tantrum worthy of a 3-year-old, not the Justice Department.
Of course, thats not what any lawyer want to hear about a client. But beyond the theatrics, the bigger problem is that Howell and other judges are swiftly ruling against the underlying orders, thus far backing the wisdom of the firms that have chosen to fight back.
FakeNoose
(37,211 posts)While they're doing that, they should trash the whole Project 2025 plan.