Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

BumRushDaShow

(151,197 posts)
Thu Apr 24, 2025, 05:00 AM Yesterday

Judge grills administration on 'broad discretion' to break up federal unions

Source: Government Executive

April 23, 2025 05:04 PM ET


A federal judge appeared poised to at least partially block the Trump administration’s effort to strip two-thirds of the federal workforce of their collective bargaining rights, following oral arguments Wednesday in one union’s lawsuit against the White House.

Last month, President Trump signed an executive order citing a rarely used provision of the 1978 Civil Service Reform Act to exempt wide swathes of the federal government from federal labor law under the auspices of national security. Prior to the edict, the CSRA’s so-called national security exemption had only been used for the intelligence community and some pockets of federal law enforcement.

Shortly thereafter, the National Treasury Employees Union filed a lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia and asked U.S. District Judge Paul Friedman, a Clinton appointee, to enjoin the government from implementing the order, which would bar union representation for two-thirds of the federal workforce writ large and 75% of federal employees currently represented by organized labor.

NTEU, and other unions in separate legal challenges, have argued that the executive order unlawfully stretches a narrow exception beyond the legal bounds of the Civil Service Reform Act and that the administration is acting not out of concern for national security, but rather to retaliate against unions that have challenged other workforce policies in court, violating their First Amendment rights.

Read more: https://www.govexec.com/workforce/2025/04/judge-grills-administration-broad-discretion-break-federal-unions/404783/

4 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Judge grills administration on 'broad discretion' to break up federal unions (Original Post) BumRushDaShow Yesterday OP
Firing 200,000+ federal employees whacks unions too. See a pattern there? /nt bucolic_frolic Yesterday #1
He came out and said he would fire strikers way before last November mdbl Yesterday #2
A lot of that accelerated with the idiotic ALEC-generated "Right to Work" crap BumRushDaShow Yesterday #3
yes and members in my union voted for it. mdbl Yesterday #4

mdbl

(6,279 posts)
2. He came out and said he would fire strikers way before last November
Thu Apr 24, 2025, 08:44 AM
Yesterday

So any union member that votes like a magat is shooting themselves in the foot. They have been doing this in numerous local elections as well since the Raygun administration. They put idiots in power at the state level who pass laws taking away any power labor fought to obtain for the last 100 years. Then when something bad happens to them they run to the union expecting help after they did everything they could to strip the union of any power to help. Dumbasses.

BumRushDaShow

(151,197 posts)
3. A lot of that accelerated with the idiotic ALEC-generated "Right to Work" crap
Thu Apr 24, 2025, 09:13 AM
Yesterday

that was pushed through a number of red states - https://www.alecexposed.org/wiki/Right_to_Work_Act_Exposed

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Judge grills administrati...