States could lose infrastructure funding over immigration, DEI: Transportation secretary
Source: The Hill
04/24/25 2:44 PM ET
Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy warned states Thursday that they will lose federal funding for roads, bridges and other infrastructure projects if they continue to foster diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI) programs; impede President Trumps immigration enforcement efforts; or defy other directives from the administration.
Federal grants come with a clear obligation to adhere to federal laws, Duffy said in a statement released alongside a letter that he sent to all recipients of Department of Transportation (DOT) funding. It shouldnt be controversial enforce our immigration rules, end anti-American DEI policies and protect free speech. These values reflect the priorities of the American people, and I will take action to ensure compliance, he added.
Duffy stressed in the letter that federal funding recipients, including states and local governing bodies, entered into legally enforceable agreements with the United States Government and are obligated to comply fully with all applicable Federal laws and regulations.
The Transportation chief specifically highlighted anti-discrimination laws and the Supreme Courts 2023 ruling against affirmative action as the basis for pulling funds from states with DEI programs, and he wrote that providing drivers licenses to migrants without legal status or hampering Immigration and Customs Enforcement investigations also will be considered grounds for withholding funds. DOT will award and continue to provide Federal financial assistance only to those recipients who comply with their legal obligations, Duffy wrote.
Read more: https://thehill.com/homenews/administration/5265708-sean-duffy-donald-trump-agenda-dei-funding/
And with respect to this -
by censoring someone else's "free speech".

But remember - "Price of eggs", "Kitchen table issues", "Working class".

Puppyjive
(690 posts)I want to know. It is an illness.
odins folly
(356 posts)Moostache
(10,460 posts)other than whatever woman actually consented to marry him willingly...
mdbl
(6,275 posts)These assholes keep forgetting they aren't dictators.
Falcon101
(46 posts)Dems need to run on protecting states rights which is ironic since it was a GOP thing at one time.
mpcamb
(3,066 posts)WAKE THE F___ UP!
OldBaldy1701E
(7,701 posts)It works both ways, Duffy doodle.
sinkingfeeling
(55,075 posts)Septua
(2,757 posts)Or what's the law that makes it illegal?
Old Crank
(5,543 posts)and guidance as to what they mean by DEI.
You can't follow guidelines that change like sand in the wind.