Columbia Fails to Meet Accreditation Status, Trump Admin Warns
Last edited Wed Jun 4, 2025, 05:46 PM - Edit history (1)
Source: Newsweek
The United States Department of Education (DOE) determined that Columbia University has violated a federal civil rights law, the DOE said Wednesday in a press release.
The notification comes after the DOE opened an investigation into the University in February.
"The U.S. Department of Education's Office for Civil Rights (OCR) today notified Middle States Commission on Higher Education (the Commission) that its member institution, Columbia University, is in violation of federal antidiscrimination laws and therefore fails to meet the standards for accreditation set by the Commission," the release said.
Why It Matters
Colleges without federal accreditation lose access to federal student aid, preventing millions of prospective and current students from getting the financial help they may need in order to be able to afford attendance.
Read more: https://www.newsweek.com/columbia-fails-meet-accreditation-status-trump-admin-warns-2081112
Trump is punishing Columbia for protests related to Gaza. This threat is despite the actions Columbia has already taken to appease Trump. Threatening Columbia with the loss of its accreditation is part of Trump's plan to attack Ivy League Universities, using Jewish students as the pretext.
It follows the cancellation of $400m in federal grants and contracts, after which the university yielded to a series of changes demanded by the administration, including setting up a new disciplinary committee, initiating investigations into students critical of Israel's war in Gaza, and ceding control of its Middle East studies department.
Columbia was at the forefront of student encampment protests last spring, with more direct action protests erupting in recent weeks and jeers at leadership at commencement ceremonies last month, and has cycled through a series of university presidents in the past 18 months.

Norrrm
(1,886 posts)Fullduplexxx
(8,491 posts)Columbia was at the forefront of student encampment protests last spring, with more direct action protests erupting in recent weeks and jeers at leadership at commencement ceremonies last month, and has cycled through a series of university presidents in the past 18 months.
pnwmom
(109,898 posts)Fullduplexxx
(8,491 posts)pnwmom
(109,898 posts)because of its student protests.
Fullduplexxx
(8,491 posts)pnwmom
(109,898 posts)newdeal2
(2,839 posts)They will come back asking for more and more.
bucolic_frolic
(50,788 posts)wolfie001
(5,270 posts)So says Der Fuehrer Shitler
[img][/img]
SARose
(1,533 posts)Snip
Congress can amend Title VI to clarify if and when it prohibits religious discrimination. It could, for example, add religion as a protected category or elaborate on when religious discrimination overlaps with racial or national origin discrimination. Congress may consider how other antidiscrimination laws approach prohibitions on religious discrimination, particularly given that a large number of sectarian schools accept federal funding. Other antidiscrimination laws contain exceptions for certain conduct by at least some religious institutions, including sectarian schools. Title VI does not.
Since 2016, lawmakers have introduced a version of the Antisemitism Awareness Act at least eight times, as well as other bills that could cause schools, colleges, and universities to lose federal funding if they respond inadequately to antisemitism as defined by the IHRA. Congress may consider how these and similar bills interact with Title VI. The versions of the Antisemitism Awareness Act in the 118th Congress, for example, instruct ED to "take into consideration" the IHRA definition of antisemitism when enforcing Title VI, but they do not amend Title VI itself to explain if and when Title VI covers religious discrimination at all. The Antisemitism Awareness Act also does not specify whether the IHRA definition of antisemitism is to be considered in private lawsuits in addition to OCR enforcement actions.
Various approaches to combating religious discrimination at schools, colleges, and universities may also raise complex constitutional questions. In imposing obligations on sectarian schools, Congress may need to take into account First Amendment limits on applying antidiscrimination laws to religious institutions. Furthermore, lower courts have struck down some school policies prohibiting harassment or limiting access to certain speakers as vague, overbroad, or viewpoint discrimination in violation of the First Amendment. The IHRA defines antisemitism broadly"a certain perception of Jews"and includes some forms of criticism of Israel that courts and commentators, including an author of the IHRA definition, have suggested enjoy First Amendment protection. There may be other constitutional considerations as well. For example, laws that extend greater protection to people of one faith than to people of other faiths may face scrutiny under the Equal Protection or Establishment Clauses.
More
This a snippet of
Topics: Education; Law, Constitution & Civil Liberties
Publication Date: 09/17/2024
Author: Graber, Abigail A.
From Congress.gov see link above.
Any attorneys want to weigh in?
riversedge
(75,981 posts)ananda
(32,079 posts)I think it is indeed part of the Nazi desire to destroy education and make up any
excuse to do it.
But I also think there's a personal component in the wish to destroy anyone
or anything that makes him feel uncomfortable or disturbed.
It is this personal component that makes everything he does so destructive
and vicious, and not just defeating for the target but also for himself,
his administration, the people, and the rest of the world.
benpollard
(249 posts)Scrivener7
(55,967 posts)Columbia better not give any more ground to that idiot. I'm so ashamed of them.
FakeNoose
(37,597 posts)Chump is losing a lot of these lawsuits too.
angrychair
(10,709 posts)Think about the implications of them forcing Columbia or Harvard or MIT to shut down because he makes them lose their accreditation.
Just from a research perspective it would cripple every possible category of science worldwide.
This line of attack is incredibly disturbing and dangerous.
Exp
(379 posts)hedda_foil
(16,747 posts)lonely bird
(2,354 posts)Has no authority to withdraw accreditation.
Sue the federal government collectively and Trump individually.
Karasu
(1,342 posts)every damn day.
flamingdem
(40,490 posts)and dare to use their words. This headline buys into his argument as if there is one.