Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

BumRushDaShow

(165,245 posts)
Wed Jun 4, 2025, 05:10 PM Jun 2025

Judge Warns Mike Lindell to Stop Posting About and Discussing Defamation Trial on Social Media

Source: MEDIAite

Jun 4th, 2025, 1:49 pm


MyPillow CEO Mike Lindell was warned by the judge presiding over his defamation trial to stop discussing the proceedings on social media. “I am concerned not only about the tainting of potential witnesses, but I’m concerned about preserving a fair and unbiased jury,” U.S. District Court Judge Nina Wang told Lindell on Wednesday morning, according to Denver’s NBC affiliate 9News.

Eric Coomer, a former director with Denver-based Dominion Voting Systems, is suing Lindell for defamation based on the MAGA star’s repeated false claims that Dominion Voting Systems were used to rig the 2020 presidential election in former President Joe Biden’s favor. Lindell even released a movie about his conspiracy theories in 2021 called Absolute Proof. He was sued for defamation in 2022.

A court order issued on May 20 prohibits real-time reporting from the trial, something Lindell has been doing through his Lindell TV outlet. Lawyers for the plaintiff informed the court that on June 3, Lindell posted to his X account during the trial multiple times. Lindell has also been talking to media outside the courthouse.

“I will have my phone off in court,” Lindell told the judge on Wednesday. “That would be a great idea,” she said. Lindell only faced a verbal warning over his conduct, but he could face sanctions if he continues to post about his ongoing trial.

Read more: https://www.mediaite.com/media/news/judge-warns-mike-lindell-to-stop-posting-about-and-discussing-defamation-trial-on-social-media/

11 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Judge Warns Mike Lindell to Stop Posting About and Discussing Defamation Trial on Social Media (Original Post) BumRushDaShow Jun 2025 OP
poisoning the potential jury pool is probably the point. cab67 Jun 2025 #1
He is financially backrupt anyway Bluetus Jun 2025 #3
That's too bad.. yourout Jun 2025 #4
But it means he is able to get away with anything, as long as it is a civil penalty Bluetus Jun 2025 #6
Is that true for punitive damages? cab67 Jun 2025 #7
I believe so. I'm not a lawyer Bluetus Jun 2025 #8
also not a lawyer - cab67 Jun 2025 #9
Pillow guy has no wages Bluetus Jun 2025 #10
Are these judges ever going to stop "warning" people and instead throw them in jail for contempt? malthaussen Jun 2025 #2
No. Because they don't want to end the myth that they actually have some authority. Bluetus Jun 2025 #11
Some people just suck up all the oxygen in the judicial system. xuplate Jun 2025 #5

cab67

(3,624 posts)
1. poisoning the potential jury pool is probably the point.
Wed Jun 4, 2025, 05:24 PM
Jun 2025

This would increase the possibility that an impartial jury can't be empaneled in the first place.

That, and he never seems to know when it's smart to shut his yap.

Bluetus

(2,223 posts)
6. But it means he is able to get away with anything, as long as it is a civil penalty
Wed Jun 4, 2025, 06:40 PM
Jun 2025

That means the court can impose a fine and he can simply say "Get in line. I'm never paying any of those judgments."

The things he has been doing need criminal penalties. It is amazing how people like this can manipulate the legal system to stay out of prison, even on drug charges.

Bluetus

(2,223 posts)
8. I believe so. I'm not a lawyer
Thu Jun 5, 2025, 08:49 AM
Jun 2025

but my understanding is that the only thing a civil court can do is jail for contempt, and that almost never happens. I don't think that contempt applies to failure to pay. I think that would have to go to another court to enforce the judgment, and he'll use bankruptcy as a sword rather than a shield.

cab67

(3,624 posts)
9. also not a lawyer -
Thu Jun 5, 2025, 09:11 AM
Jun 2025

- but my understanding (which could easily be wrong) is that bankruptcy can block actual damages, but not punitive damages; and that wages can be garnished to cover these obligations.

Bluetus

(2,223 posts)
10. Pillow guy has no wages
Thu Jun 5, 2025, 08:42 PM
Jun 2025

He's not on a payroll. There is nothing to garnish. He may have some hidden assets, but I think that the creditors first have to get their judgment, and then they'd have to chase him through bankruptcy court.

Admittedly, neither of us has the legal BG to know for sure. Perhaps somebody with specific expertise can clarify.

malthaussen

(18,375 posts)
2. Are these judges ever going to stop "warning" people and instead throw them in jail for contempt?
Wed Jun 4, 2025, 05:41 PM
Jun 2025

Don't they know the rest of us view them as weak and ineffectual when they just wave their fingers aimlessly?

-- Mal

Bluetus

(2,223 posts)
11. No. Because they don't want to end the myth that they actually have some authority.
Thu Jun 5, 2025, 08:45 PM
Jun 2025

As soon as they try to use real teeth, they fear that this will be the final revelation that our courts actually have no authority if faced with an executive branch that simply ignores them. Nobody at any level of the judicial system, ESPECIALLY the SCOTUS, wants to see that exposed because that is the end of the line for their erstwhile power.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Judge Warns Mike Lindell ...