Schumer renames Trump megabill the 'Well, We're All Going to Die Act'
Source: The Hill
06/04/25 11:13 PM ET
Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) gave a new name to the big, beautiful bill on Wednesday, calling it the Well, Were All Going to Die Act. Schumer appeared at a press conference alongside Sens. Maggie Hassan (D-N.H.) and Ron Wyden (D-Ore.) and stood next to a sign that read Well, Were All Going to Die Act, a reference to previous comments from Sen. Joni Ernst (R-Iowa.)
The more you look at the bill, at the House bill, the worse it gets, Schumer said during the press conference. The New York Democrat added later that this bill is just tax breaks for the ultra wealthy, paid for by gutting health care for up to 16 million Americans.
During a recent town hall in Butler, Iowa, Ernst defended spending reforms included in the big, beautiful bill passed by the House, including those that would stop people from getting federal benefits if theyve entered the country illegally.
A person in the crowd attempted to talk over the senator, interrupting her while she was answering questions about changes to Medicaid and SNAP and shouting that people are going to die as a result. Well, were all going to die, Ernst responded, drawing jeers.
Read more: https://thehill.com/homenews/senate/5333871-schumer-renames-trump-megabill-the-well-were-all-going-to-die-act/

sop
(14,628 posts)twodogsbarking
(13,941 posts)Was that too harsh?
I've been trying to be nice but fucking reality gets in the way
ancianita
(40,624 posts)The reality existed before Schumer or the rest of us were even born.
Crime is up in red states and down in blue states, and down across the US overall. But don't let that reality get in the way of your impulsive harsh. You want to undermine a Democratic leader with some corporate hype re the USA, that's on you.
twodogsbarking
(13,941 posts)
ancianita
(40,624 posts)I only wrote what I wrote just in case. No hard feelings.
twodogsbarking
(13,941 posts)There are circumstances where you can justify it, I guess, and times when it is rationalized which seems to be the precedent. Stayed tuned to this station for more pessimism on the state of the world. No offese taken. I know when I am being offended and I usually ignore it.
ancianita
(40,624 posts)On being offended, I'm responding to your comment undermining a Democratic leader. Bickering with other Democrats usually weakens party morale and energy, overall, and ignoring internal party bickering contributes to party disunity.
twodogsbarking
(13,941 posts)ancianita
(40,624 posts)sheshe2
(92,344 posts)He is correct.
greatauntoftriplets
(177,742 posts)Or, the pukes are going to kill us all bill.
70sEraVet
(4,576 posts)Joni was stupid enough to utter the words, thinking she was mocking the audience member for showing a bit of compassion -- but making people die is what all of these Repubs have been voting for!
"Instead of a cross, the Albatross
about my neck was hung"
Keep hanging that Albatross, Chuck!!
Justice matters.
(8,421 posts)cheaper on the dime...
SCantiGOP
(14,491 posts)The text from Musks twisted brain was perfect- concise and to the point.
Describe it like he did:
Kill the bill (before it kills you).
BattleRow
(1,624 posts)ffr
(23,194 posts)Fixed!
Call it what it is, a Republican Spending Bill.
ancianita
(40,624 posts)
StarryNite
(11,614 posts)Which by the way is what Project 2025 calls for. And most of the horses and burros removed from our public lands by the BLM and Forest Service are being removed not because of overpopulation but to appease special interest groups like public lands ranchers. Ranchers who happen to cost the tax payer millions of dollars a year in subsidies and many are wealthy like the Koch bros.
Trump budget could open the door to selling wild horses for slaughter
By Scott Streater | 06/03/2025 01:40 PM EDT
The fiscal 2026 proposal omits language prohibiting the Bureau of Land Management from selling or transferring any of the federally protected animals to places where they could be slaughtered.
President Donald Trumps fiscal 2026 budget request proposes addressing the skyrocketing costs of wild horse and burro management by striking a provision designed to protect them.
The Bureau of Land Management budget request, details of which were released by the White House late Friday, would dramatically cut funding for the wild horse and burro program and remove previous safeguards mandated by Congress that forbid the bureau from selling or transferring any of the federally protected animals to places where they could be slaughtered.
https://www.eenews.net/articles/trump-budget-could-open-the-door-to-selling-wild-horses-for-slaughter/
Bayard
(25,441 posts)Thanks for posting.
I've been arguing this for years. Wild horses grazing on public lands belong to the American people. Most want to keep them there. The prohibitions against who can adopt them has mostly kept sneaky horse traders at bay, from "adopting," them, then selling to the meat market in other countries.
The big commercial cattle ranchers consider them as vermin who eat, "their grass," and want them all exterminated. However, they are grazing their cattle on public lands that belong to the American people. They lease it from the government for a pittance.
Some people still consider horses as livestock--including Congress apparently. It depends on how you look at them. If you are breeding them on a farm, that's considered agricultural and livestock. They fall in the, "pet," category if you use them for anything else, from competing, trail riding, or being your best friend. They are definitely not considered food in this country. Would you eat a poodle?
trump hates all animals. He wants to get rid of Endangered Species protections, and anything else he considers a profit loss, especially any that stand in the way of the oligarchs.
StarryNite
(11,614 posts)prior to this Big Bullshit Bill coming out. So they knew ahead of time what was coming and added the killing of federally protected wild horses from the Carter Reservoir, Buckhorn, and Coppersmith herds. They are planning on beginning rounding them up this summer. The Record Of Decision (ROD) for these three herds states:
(c) Remaining excess animals for which no adoption demand by qualified individuals exists shall
be destroyed in accordance with subpart 4730 of this part.
This is the first time we have seen that direct language in an ROD.
Bayard
(25,441 posts)Congress quackers don't write this crap themselves. Who does it, and who gives them their marching orders?
StarryNite
(11,614 posts)They think they are going to be raptured and in the meantime they can do whatever they want to whoever they want with no repercussions because their god is on their side.
Mysterian
(5,682 posts)Fight fire with fire!
Aristus
(70,124 posts)Re-name their bills to something negative, catchy, and undermining of the intent of the bill.
They've hung Hillarycare, Obamacare, death panels, and all kinds of shit on us for so long, we need to start giving them a taste of their own medicine. I really hope this will help decrease public support for the bill.
Paladin
(30,686 posts)Now: Do something like this, every freaking day.
bucolic_frolic
(50,788 posts)Way to go, Sen. Schumer.
markie
(23,417 posts)figured out years ago...