Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

BumRushDaShow

(154,205 posts)
Tue Jun 10, 2025, 09:42 AM Tuesday

Smithsonian board to keep institution 'free from political or partisan influence'

Source: NPR

June 10, 2025 12:32 AM ET


The Smithsonian Institution has released its first statement since President Trump announced on social media that he had fired one of its museum directors. The statement affirms the institution as an "independent entity" that will continue to be governed by a Board of Regents, or board of trustees, and managed by Secretary Lonnie G. Bunch.

While the statement does not specifically address President Trump's recent claim that he fired National Portrait Gallery Director Kim Sajet, it is unequivocal about who is in charge of Smithsonian employees: "All personnel decisions are made by and subject to the direction of the Secretary, with oversight by the Board. Lonnie G. Bunch, the secretary, has the support of the Board of Regents in his authority and management of the Smithsonian."

The chief justice of the U.S. Supreme Court, John G. Roberts, and Vice President JD Vance are ex officio members of the Board of Regents, meaning they serve as a duty of their office. The chief justice also serves as the Board of Regents' chancellor. The board also includes three members from the U.S. Senate, three members from the U.S. House of Representatives, and nine public citizens.

Trump has shown disdain for the Smithsonian Institution. In an executive order, he said it had come "under the influence of a divisive, race-centered ideology" and that his administration would "prohibit" funding for "exhibits or programs that degrade shared American values, divide Americans based on race, or promote programs or ideologies inconsistent with Federal law and policy." Then, on May 30, he claimed on social media that he was "terminating" Sajet, calling her "a highly partisan person, and a strong supporter of DEI, which is totally inappropriate for her position." Sajet, however, continued to report for work, according to The Washington Post.

Read more: https://www.npr.org/2025/06/10/nx-s1-5428588/smithsonian-trump-sajet-bunch



Link to Smithsonian NEWS RELEASE - Smithsonian Statement

Museums in general are sort of a "niche" entity in the scheme of things where it seems it took a long time for the Smithsonian Board of Regents to wake up out of their bubble and slumber to react to what was going on "outside" (which included the National Museum of African American History & Culture removing items and whatnot ).
2 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Smithsonian board to keep institution 'free from political or partisan influence' (Original Post) BumRushDaShow Tuesday OP
As an evolutionary biologist, I worry about Orange Julius Caesar's fundamentalist "Christian" buddies generalbetrayus Tuesday #1
And these will be among the first things to be destroyed slightlv Tuesday #2

generalbetrayus

(982 posts)
1. As an evolutionary biologist, I worry about Orange Julius Caesar's fundamentalist "Christian" buddies
Tue Jun 10, 2025, 11:12 AM
Tuesday

insisting on creationist exhibits in the National Museum of Natural History. I'm pretty sure you would see mass resignation of good people at the museum if such an edict were ever to come down.

slightlv

(5,739 posts)
2. And these will be among the first things to be destroyed
Tue Jun 10, 2025, 11:19 AM
Tuesday

once we regain power. We will drag R's into the 21st century kicking and screaming with a remedial class on separation of church and state. In fact, I'd really like to see "church" take an extremely smaller position in public in general. I don't begrudge anyone their need or desire for ritual, belief in something bigger than themselves, or the need to feel a part of something bigger. I do, however, hold utter disdain for those who have to smash it into everyone else's face.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Smithsonian board to keep...