Senate Parliamentarian Deals Huge Blow To Critical Part Of GOP's 'Big Beautiful Bill'
Source: HuffPost
WASHINGTON The Senate parliamentarian said that major Medicaid cuts in the GOPs massive tax and spending package violate the chambers rules a big setback for President Donald Trumps legislative agenda.
Republicans already were having big disagreements over the Medicaid provisions of their so-called Big Beautiful Bill, and the parliamentarians ruling threatens to blow up the legislation altogether.
The core of the bill is a package of tax cuts costing around $4 trillion financed in part by about $1 trillion in spending cuts to Medicaid and the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program. The Senates in-house rules expert has now thrown the cuts into doubt, potentially making it even harder for Republicans to claim the legislation is fiscally responsible.
The rulings announced Thursday morning by Sen. Jeff Merkley (D-Ore.), who has led Democrats challenges to the bills provisions in closed-door meetings with the parliamentarian, concern cuts to Medicaid funding for states that cover noncitizens, a ban on gender-affirming care in the Childrens Health Insurance Program and a limit on provider taxes states use to finance their portion of Medicaid spending.
Read more: https://www.huffpost.com/entry/parliamentarian-medicaid-cuts-provider-tax_n_685d4229e4b0f78c573833aa

LetMyPeopleVote
(166,992 posts)This makes me smile. Here are more provisions that have to be removed from the asshole's big ### bill
Link to tweet


trump will need 60 votes in the Senate to get these provision adopted
CousinIT
(11,670 posts)
NJCher
(40,848 posts)Eom
azureblue
(2,503 posts)the gop looking for a way out.
FadedMullet
(366 posts)yorkster
(3,274 posts)Just because that terrible bill has such a ridiculous official name doesn't mean we have to use it.
mdbl
(7,043 posts)CaptainTruth
(7,802 posts)Bayard
(26,186 posts)Because she tells them they are idiots.
LetMyPeopleVote
(166,992 posts)If Thune over rules the Senate Parliamentarian, then the Byrd rule will effectively be dead.
Thune says he wonât overrule Senate referee on Medicaid cuts
— @mterr337 (@mterr337xxx.bsky.social) 2025-06-26T15:14:49.007Z
Source: The Hill
share.newsbreak.com/drer38uw
Link to tweet
No. That would not be a good outcome for getting a bill done, Thune told reporters at the Capitol.
Senate Parliamentarian Elizabeth MacDonough rejected a plan that would cap states ability to collect more federal Medicaid funding via healthcare care provider taxes. The move would have collected hundreds of billions in savings, which Republicans were relying on.
Thune says Republican leaders knew it was going to be an interesting conversation with the Senates referee about the provision, but believes there are actions members can take to find similar savings.
Calista241
(5,631 posts)I suspect Trump doesn't give 2 shits what the Senate Parliamentarian says.
regnaD kciN
(27,201 posts)that, if they eliminate the Byrd rule, should Democrats ever gain control of Congress and the White House again, they could ram through all sorts of things (a legislative restoration of Roe, expanding SCOTUS, mandating LGBTQ rights in every state, statehood for D.C., Puerto Rico and Guam) in their own BBB, and only need fifty votes to pass it.
OMGWTF
(4,860 posts)I loathe these soulless, greedy mofos more than mere words can express.
Fil1957
(153 posts)Wiz Imp
(6,296 posts)He's smart enough to know that overruling her or firing her would have significant negative consequences for them in the future. And it's obvious that 90% of the goal of this bill is to cut taxes on the rich, so as long as the bill does that, most will be satisfied.
Fil1957
(153 posts)Wiz Imp
(6,296 posts)That actually lets many Republicans off the hook as many of the things various Senators objected to have been eliminated by the Parliamentarian so it makes it easier for them to vote for it. This makes it more likely to pass. Make no mistake, it will be still be a terrible bill but not nearly as awful as they tried to make it.
It still will need to be passed by the house, and I wouldn't count on that happening if they don't restore the increase in the SALT deduction to the levels from the original House bill.
Sneederbunk
(16,340 posts)Liberty Belle
(9,675 posts)LetMyPeopleVote
(166,992 posts)Donald Trump has said the GOP is united behind the inaptly named One Big Beautiful Bill Act. The truth for Republicans isn't nearly that simple.
Overlapping problems create uncertainty over the future of the Republican megabill www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddo... via @msnbc
— Slapshot1955 (@slapshot19551.bsky.social) 2025-06-26T20:41:04.730Z
Link to tweet
https://www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddow-show/maddowblog/overlapping-problems-create-uncertainty-future-republican-megabill-rcna214977
1. GOP numbers arent adding up: The Congressional Budget Office concluded last week that the House version of the package would add $3.4 trillion to the national debt, and this week, the nonpartisan Joint Committee on Taxation found that proposed Senate changes would add an additional $400 billion to the price tag.
2. The Byrd bath: Because Republicans are relying on the budget reconciliation process, which prevents Democrats from derailing the bill with a filibuster, GOP lawmakers are having to subject the legislation to a complex process which includes having the Senate parliamentarian remove provisions that run afoul of certain budgetary rules. This process is known as the Byrd bath, named after the late Democratic Sen. Bob Byrd of West Virginia.
In recent days, several key measures have already been stricken from the bill, including elements the party was counting on to help GOP numbers add up. This has caused a behind-the-scenes scramble that has not yet been resolved.
On Thursday, the developments for the party managed to get even worse. NBC News reported, "Republicans suffered a blow Thursday after the Senate referee ruled that a series of health care cuts and savings in their sweeping domestic policy bill are ineligible for the party-line path they're using to get around the chamber's 60-vote threshold."
The result leaves GOP leaders with limited choices: They can (a) look for other solutions; (b) try to tweak the legislation and ask the parliamentarian to take another look; or (c) vote to override the parliamentarian, which would be a radical and dramatic move that would risk altering how the institution functions going forward.
3. Far-right House Republicans think the Senates approach isnt conservative enough: As The New York Times reported, Some conservatives in the House only grudgingly voted for the legislation the first time, arguing that it did not go far enough in cutting spending, including on Medicaid. They agreed to support the package only after securing what they characterized as commitments from their Senate colleagues to enact deeper cuts and fix the measure. Now, those House Republicans regard the bill taking shape in the Senate, which party leaders hope to push through within days, as even worse.
4. House Republicans from competitive districts think the Senates approach is too conservative: As NBC News reported, On Tuesday, 16 House Republicans almost all representing competitive districts sent a letter rebelling against the Senates Medicaid cuts. They fretted that those policies would place additional burdens on hospitals, among other things.
5. The entire effort is unpopular. I mean, really unpopular. Republican officials have been working on this for roughly eight months, and talking up how great their plan is, but at least for now, the American mainstream isn't buying what the GOP is selling, which puts added pressure on members worried about their re-election prospects.
Given the scope of the intraparty disagreements, its not yet clear how, when or whether Republicans will work out their differences, and given the narrow margins in both chambers, the margin of error for party leaders is small. That said, if recent history is any guide, most, if not all, of the GOP members expressing skepticism about the legislation can be expected to cave after a couple of angry phone calls and tweets from the president.
We are headed to a debt ceiling issue soon which is why trump wants this bill done by July 4. I doubt that this will happen and we may see an emergency extension of the debt ceiling.