Parliamentarian rejects GOP attempt to prohibit federal subsidies for health plans that cover abortion services
Source: The Hill
06/26/25 7:53 AM ET
The Senate parliamentarian ruled on Wednesday to reject Republican language in the Senate megabill that would prohibit federal subsidies under the Affordable Care Act (ACA) from going to qualified health plans that cover abortion services.
The Republican language in the bill would restrict the ACAs cost-sharing subsidies from lowering the costs of plans that cover abortion services in about a dozen states, according to the Commonwealth Fund, an independent health research and policy group.
The provision would have had an outsized impact on states such as Connecticut, Michigan and New Mexico, where insurers now cover abortion services voluntarily but would have incentive to drop abortion coverage to become eligible for federal cost-sharing payment under the Republican proposal, according to a Commonwealth Fund analysis.
The Senate Parliamentarian, Elizabeth MacDonough, rejected another provision to end silver loading under the Affordable Care Act, which would change the longstanding practice of allowing insurers to increase premiums to cover the cost of subsidies that resulted in larger premium tax credits and made marketplace premiums more affordable for millions of consumers.
Read more: https://thehill.com/homenews/senate/5370563-parliamentarian-rules-aca-abortion-subsidies/
TALLY OF ITEMS STRIPPED BY PARLIAMENTARIAN SO FAR (plus the OP)
(Agriculture Committee) - https://www.democraticunderground.com/10143482891
(Banking, Environmental, Armed Services Committees) - https://www.democraticunderground.com/10143482360
(Judiciary Committee) - https://www.democraticunderground.com/10143483730
(Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs) - https://www.democraticunderground.com/10143484256
(Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs) - https://www.democraticunderground.com/10143484336
(Energy and Natural Resources Committee) - https://www.democraticunderground.com/10143485062
(Health, Education, Labor and Pensions) - https://www.democraticunderground.com/10143486073

Response to BumRushDaShow (Original post)
Wicked Blue This message was self-deleted by its author.
BumRushDaShow
(157,262 posts)I even referenced your thread as one of the other "strikes".
riversedge
(76,784 posts)Abstractartist
(285 posts)You know whats going to happen. Since she is doing a fantastic job, and since she can be fired by the Senate Majority leader, and since he is most likely as much of a scumbag as the other MAGAts .well good luck Elizabeth MacDonough . I hope things work out for you.
LetMyPeopleVote
(166,916 posts)Donald Trump has said the GOP is united behind the inaptly named One Big Beautiful Bill Act. The truth for Republicans isn't nearly that simple.
Overlapping problems create uncertainty over the future of the Republican megabill www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddo... via @msnbc
— Slapshot1955 (@slapshot19551.bsky.social) 2025-06-26T20:41:04.730Z
Link to tweet
https://www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddow-show/maddowblog/overlapping-problems-create-uncertainty-future-republican-megabill-rcna214977
1. GOP numbers arent adding up: The Congressional Budget Office concluded last week that the House version of the package would add $3.4 trillion to the national debt, and this week, the nonpartisan Joint Committee on Taxation found that proposed Senate changes would add an additional $400 billion to the price tag.
2. The Byrd bath: Because Republicans are relying on the budget reconciliation process, which prevents Democrats from derailing the bill with a filibuster, GOP lawmakers are having to subject the legislation to a complex process which includes having the Senate parliamentarian remove provisions that run afoul of certain budgetary rules. This process is known as the Byrd bath, named after the late Democratic Sen. Bob Byrd of West Virginia.
In recent days, several key measures have already been stricken from the bill, including elements the party was counting on to help GOP numbers add up. This has caused a behind-the-scenes scramble that has not yet been resolved.
On Thursday, the developments for the party managed to get even worse. NBC News reported, "Republicans suffered a blow Thursday after the Senate referee ruled that a series of health care cuts and savings in their sweeping domestic policy bill are ineligible for the party-line path they're using to get around the chamber's 60-vote threshold."
The result leaves GOP leaders with limited choices: They can (a) look for other solutions; (b) try to tweak the legislation and ask the parliamentarian to take another look; or (c) vote to override the parliamentarian, which would be a radical and dramatic move that would risk altering how the institution functions going forward.
3. Far-right House Republicans think the Senates approach isnt conservative enough: As The New York Times reported, Some conservatives in the House only grudgingly voted for the legislation the first time, arguing that it did not go far enough in cutting spending, including on Medicaid. They agreed to support the package only after securing what they characterized as commitments from their Senate colleagues to enact deeper cuts and fix the measure. Now, those House Republicans regard the bill taking shape in the Senate, which party leaders hope to push through within days, as even worse.
4. House Republicans from competitive districts think the Senates approach is too conservative: As NBC News reported, On Tuesday, 16 House Republicans almost all representing competitive districts sent a letter rebelling against the Senates Medicaid cuts. They fretted that those policies would place additional burdens on hospitals, among other things.
5. The entire effort is unpopular. I mean, really unpopular. Republican officials have been working on this for roughly eight months, and talking up how great their plan is, but at least for now, the American mainstream isn't buying what the GOP is selling, which puts added pressure on members worried about their re-election prospects.
Given the scope of the intraparty disagreements, its not yet clear how, when or whether Republicans will work out their differences, and given the narrow margins in both chambers, the margin of error for party leaders is small. That said, if recent history is any guide, most, if not all, of the GOP members expressing skepticism about the legislation can be expected to cave after a couple of angry phone calls and tweets from the president.
We are headed to a debt ceiling issue soon which is why trump wants this bill done by July 4. I doubt that this will happen and we may see an emergency extension of the debt ceiling.
Hekate
(98,677 posts)A Badger
(21 posts)Nice work on this, and with the tally updates.