Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

BumRushDaShow

(157,262 posts)
Sat Jun 28, 2025, 03:58 AM Jun 28

Republican Says 'Most' of Iran's Uranium is Still There

Source: Newsweek

Published Jun 27, 2025 at 4:48 PM EDT | Updated Jun 27, 2025 at 4:51 PM EDT


Republican Representative Michael McCaul of Texas told CNN on Friday that "most" of Iran's enriched uranium is intact after U.S. airstrikes hit the Fordow, Isfahan and Natanz nuclear sites.

Why It Matters

McCaul's comments came after lawmakers were given classified briefings on the strikes, which were carried out last weekend and which President Donald Trump said "completely and totally obliterated" Iran's nuclear facilities.

The full extent of the damage remains unknown and CNN, The New York Times and other media outlets reported that a preliminary assessment from the Defense Intelligence Agency said the strikes did not destroy the key components of Iran's nuclear infrastructure.

The White House has publicly confirmed the existence of the assessment, though it disputes media reports about the early intelligence findings and is working on finding the source of the media leak. Israeli intelligence reports have also contradicted the initial U.S. assessment, estimating that more "significant" damage was done by the bombing.

Read more: https://www.newsweek.com/mccaul-texas-house-republican-uranium-iran-2091879

15 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

Hugin

(36,695 posts)
1. How hard would it be to say, all.
Sat Jun 28, 2025, 04:22 AM
Jun 28

Oh, and PS the leak is coming from outside the house. But, they’ll use it to crucify Tulski, anyway.

Hundreds of millions of dollars thrown away for a sound bite and a pathetic shambling squeaking lap around the emperor-has-no-clothes.

Irish_Dem

(72,736 posts)
2. And troops put in danger for a Trump reality show stunt.
Sat Jun 28, 2025, 04:27 AM
Jun 28

To compensate for his feelings of inadequacy and ego needs.

cadoman

(1,526 posts)
14. there is gonna be a huge incentive for hawks to find uranium or systems still there
Sat Jun 28, 2025, 06:42 PM
Jun 28

If it's all destroyed it kills a lot of the motivation for escalating conflict. Huge problem.

Expect AIPAC-aligned reps, defense contractors, mercenary groups, etc. to push strongly for an active enrichment narrative.

Mawspam2

(999 posts)
4. Photo-op Donnie must be tongue-bathed.
Sat Jun 28, 2025, 05:29 AM
Jun 28

Does the Army make a Generals uniform in size Extra-Baggy?

WestMichRad

(2,426 posts)
11. Are they disappointed that it wasn't blown to smithereens...
Sat Jun 28, 2025, 05:45 PM
Jun 28

… and dispersed across Southwest Asia?

WTF do they want to see happen to it?

WestMichRad

(2,426 posts)
13. And think of what that did to the poor Iraqi civilians.
Sat Jun 28, 2025, 06:26 PM
Jun 28

No statistics, so we’re blind to it.

War. What is it good for?

cadoman

(1,526 posts)
15. they need Iran to be a threat to escalate into a state of war
Sat Jun 28, 2025, 06:44 PM
Jun 28

If the enrichment operation was destroyed that motivation disappears.

If the strike was successful it's a huge problem for the military industrial complex. There's going to be a full court press to push the idea that it failed. Think yellow cake and kicking over baby incubators.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Republican Says 'Most' of...