RFK Jr. launches FDA review of abortion pill
Source: abcnews
Medication abortion is used in nearly two-thirds of abortions in the U.S.
By Cheyenne Haslett September 24, 2025, 8:00 PM
Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. told Republican states this week that the FDA would conduct a new review of abortion pills, a move that abortion rights advocates say could lead to significant restrictions on the most common abortion method nationwide.
Medication abortion is used in nearly two-thirds of abortions, according to the Guttmacher Institute, a research group focusing on sexual and reproductive health. It is also the primary way that abortions continue in states where abortion is banned, largely because of telehealth appointments and shield laws, which allow some providers in other states to mail abortion pills to women in states with bans without fear of prosecution.
Republicans and anti-abortion advocates have been pressing the Trump administration to change the FDA's rules around mifepristone, an oral drug typically used in combination with another drug, misoprostol, to induce an abortion or to help manage an early miscarriage.
If access to the pill were restricted, either by banning telehealth access or narrowing the window when women can use it, it would significantly cut back on abortion access in post-Roe v. Wade America, where at least 16 states have ceased nearly all abortion services.....................
Read more: https://abcnews.go.com/US/health-secretary-rfk-jr-launches-review-abortion-pill/story?id=125908299
We knew this was coming!!
Link to tweet
yardwork
(68,434 posts)It's disgraceful self-dealing. There used to be laws against this in the U.S.
Bernardo de La Paz
(59,936 posts)Efilroft Sul
(4,213 posts)TommieMommy
(2,456 posts)dalton99a
(90,950 posts)no_hypocrisy
(53,614 posts)Birth control pills
Hormone replacements
mdbl
(7,671 posts)Wouldn't surprise me if it was some quack he hired that was banned from the AMA.
MissMillie
(39,483 posts)I'd be willing to bet that a bonafide, scientific review wouldn't change anything at all.
I'm betting that a bonafide, scientific review is not what we're going to get.
NNadir
(36,834 posts)...enough to use it.
barbtries
(30,921 posts)roscoeroscoe
(1,790 posts)Big push back please, y'all!
Ray Bruns
(5,750 posts)Response to riversedge (Original post)
lostincalifornia This message was self-deleted by its author.
Bayard
(27,608 posts)Anything the brain worm turns its attention to gets warped.
I wonder how many women who made the mistake of sleeping with trump have had abortions, and how many that were raped. He certainly never cared, or paid for them.
WestMichRad
(2,739 posts)Dont puzzle over it too long. Theres a preordained outcome.
The only suspense is what bullshit reasons theyll invent to say its a health risk and that previous safety studies are incorrect.
Orrex
(66,308 posts)Grins
(9,047 posts)...in Red and purple states who turned out in droves to vote on state ballot initiatives to protect abortion - and then turned right around and voted for Trump. On the same ballot!
If they had voted for the woman opposing Trump - this would not be a problem, and Trump would soon be facing prison.
Gimpyknee
(903 posts)Elections have consequences.
yankee87
(2,714 posts)Back to the kitchen. Might as well get used to having zero rights again.
I need some hope for this country.
maxsolomon
(37,724 posts)The study was not peer-reviewed and was published by the center on its website, not in a scientific journal. It found that almost 11% of women experienced a "serious adverse event," which is much higher than the 0.5% rate found in clinical studies and listed by the FDA on the medication label.
The fix, shall we say, is in.