Grand jury rejection of Trump's 'law and order' spreads to Chicago ICE enforcement
Source: Deadline Legal Blog
Americans across the country from Washington to Los Angeles have made it clear that they reject the Trump administrations notion of law and order, with grand jurors refusing to return indictments in a series of cases alleging assaults on law enforcement during protests. Now, as President Donald Trump agitates against Chicago in his Republican administrations targeting of Democratic-run cities and states, federal grand jurors in Illinois have declined to approve charges against two people who were accused of assaulting agents in the Chicago area.
That led federal prosecutors in the Northern District of Illinois to move to dismiss the charges Wednesday. Immigration officials had touted the arrests in the case last month, writing on social media that the defendants will be prosecuted and held accountable.
While the facts of every case are different and grand jury deliberations are secret, the bottom-line pattern of these rejections is impossible to ignore. Its difficult to overstate how rare it is for grand juries to reject indictments  yet, these days, its not so unusual in the Trump Justice Department. Whether grand jurors are finding that prosecutors are overcharging, or grand jurors are refusing to return indictments despite finding sufficient evidence to proceed  or some combination thereof  this ongoing phenomenon is one of the most remarkable developments of Trumps second term.
The Illinois dismissal coincided with the arraignment of former FBI Director James Comey on Wednesday morning, whose charges Trump himself had demanded. In that case, led by an inexperienced former Trump personal lawyer over the objection of career prosecutors, Washington-area grand jurors in Northern Virginia rejected one of the three counts proposed by the administration. Comey pleaded not guilty.
Read more: https://www.msnbc.com/deadline-white-house/deadline-legal-blog/chicago-ice-trump-grand-juries-indictments-law-order-rcna236391     
 = new reply since forum marked as read
						
					
     
					
						Highlight:
						NoneDon't highlight anything
						5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
  = new reply since forum marked as read
						
					
     
					
						Highlight:
						NoneDon't highlight anything
						5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
					
				Justice Brandeis
(347 posts)A great big middle finger to prosecutors.
Marthe48
(22,164 posts)The regime is suppressing voting at the polls, but maybe they can't silence justice when juries speak.
Resist!
bluestarone
(20,611 posts)think about? I hope so.
questionseverything
(11,391 posts)The democracy you save could be your own!
progressoid
(52,232 posts)Not sure I would put that much faith in this idea that there is a rejection of Trump's 'law and order'




