Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

BumRushDaShow

(164,541 posts)
Mon Dec 8, 2025, 06:55 AM Monday

Jurors in sandwich thrower case talk about their deliberations in his trial in Washington, D.C.

Source: CBS News

December 7, 2025 / 8:00 PM EST / CBS News


The brief federal criminal trial last month of Sean Dunn, the man who threw a "submarine-style sandwich" at a Customs and Border Protection officer in downtown Washington, D.C., was only a misdemeanor case. But the courtroom was filled, and the overflow room was crowded, too.

The 12 jurors didn't realize initially that Dunn's case — and their verdict — would garner national attention. One juror thought the deliberations would last under an hour. The juror, a longtime resident of Washington, D.C., also noted that some people in the courtroom struggled to "keep a straight face" during the trial and even laughed openly. "It seemed to me like an open and closed type of thing," another juror said. "It was kind of ridiculous."

Dunn hurled the sandwich at the CBP officer stationed at a busy intersection in August. The incident was widely publicized and quickly became a symbol of resistance against President Trump's federal policing crackdown and National Guard deployment in the nation's capital.

After roughly seven hours of deliberation, the jury acquitted Dunn. It was the second time a group of D.C. citizens rejected the Justice Department's claim that Dunn, who was fired from his job at the Justice Department after the incident, had committed a crime in tossing a sandwich at a federal agent. A separate grand jury had rejected the prosecutors' request to indict Dunn on a felony charge earlier this year.

Read more: https://www.cbsnews.com/news/sandwich-thrower-jurors-interviews-sean-dunn-washington/

21 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Jurors in sandwich thrower case talk about their deliberations in his trial in Washington, D.C. (Original Post) BumRushDaShow Monday OP
Hey Beavis underpants Monday #1
;-{) Goonch Monday #2
The Teflon Dunn Prairie Gates Monday #3
Canned vegetables can also work. twodogsbarking Monday #4
Those could leave a black eye. KS Toronado Monday #5
Did you mean? mercuryblues Monday #6
Looks like it ! KS Toronado Monday #7
Or squash. Black eyed peas wins. I nominate myself the second place award winner. twodogsbarking Monday #17
It took seven hours to reach a verdict? PatSeg Monday #8
two jurors were concerned about the message an acquittal would send dsc Monday #9
Geez, really? PatSeg Monday #10
To be fair they were worried about other objects being thrown dsc Monday #11
As a juror, I would ask myself, "did the object in question present a danger to life or limb?" It's not a difficult Martin68 Monday #14
I agree with that and eventually so did those 2 jurors dsc Monday #15
Good point PatSeg Monday #18
Should have been tried in a Food Court not fooled Monday #20
Oh my god, that's perfect! PatSeg Monday #21
Well, I mean..it is food waste jfz9580m Monday #12
MAGA snowflakes trying (and often succeeding) to pervert the justice system. Martin68 Monday #13
Where I grew up it was called a sammich. twodogsbarking Monday #16
LOL LetMyPeopleVote Monday #19

PatSeg

(51,756 posts)
8. It took seven hours to reach a verdict?
Mon Dec 8, 2025, 09:17 AM
Monday

That is surprising, but it must have been hard to wrap it up when everyone was laughing.

dsc

(53,292 posts)
9. two jurors were concerned about the message an acquittal would send
Mon Dec 8, 2025, 09:25 AM
Monday

I think that message is irrelevant but that was the hold up.

PatSeg

(51,756 posts)
10. Geez, really?
Mon Dec 8, 2025, 09:39 AM
Monday

Now everyone will feel entitled to throw food at law enforcement and the whole system will collapse!

What a waste of resources and court costs.

dsc

(53,292 posts)
11. To be fair they were worried about other objects being thrown
Mon Dec 8, 2025, 09:56 AM
Monday

that it would be harder to draw a line than have a categorical thou shalt not throw stuff at agents.

Martin68

(26,816 posts)
14. As a juror, I would ask myself, "did the object in question present a danger to life or limb?" It's not a difficult
Mon Dec 8, 2025, 10:02 AM
Monday

question. The target was wearing a cap with a brim (to protect his eyes) and body armor.

dsc

(53,292 posts)
15. I agree with that and eventually so did those 2 jurors
Mon Dec 8, 2025, 10:10 AM
Monday

but I think we should be fair in discussing what the jurors were worried about accurately.

jfz9580m

(16,363 posts)
12. Well, I mean..it is food waste
Mon Dec 8, 2025, 09:56 AM
Monday


Less amusingly, that poor man’s life is ruined in other ways though. He also lost his job last I read. That’s the real war of attrition these assholes are waging.

Imagine the amount of time he must have had to waste on this and he didn’t seem like the type of guy to make bank off of this as some people can (all those grifting right wing influencers).

The right or blah are better at exploiting attention-any attention-and monetising it. Grift is a right leaning thing. It’s why they attack social safety nets, but consider it a triumph of capitalism when you can monetize junk. I call it junk capitalism.
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Jurors in sandwich throwe...