Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

BumRushDaShow

(167,376 posts)
Wed Feb 11, 2026, 06:33 PM 18 hrs ago

House votes to override Trump's Canada tariffs

Source: CNBC

Published Wed, Feb 11 2026 9:23 AM EST Updated 8 Min Ago


The House on Wednesday passed a resolution disapproving of President Donald Trump’s tariffs against Canada, a blow to Speaker Mike Johnson, R-La., and a rare Republican rebuke of the president’s signature economic policy. The resolution cleared the House 219-211, with several Republicans crossing the aisle to support it. One Democrat, Rep. Jared Golden of Maine, voted against the measure.

The tariff resolution, introduced by Rep. Gregory Meeks, D-N.Y., was considered a day after a procedural vote on a rule that would have barred House challenges to Trump’s tariffs failed with the support of three Republican members.

“The Speaker continues to abdicate his responsibilities, ceding Congress’s Article I authority to Donald Trump,” Meeks, the top Democrat on the House Foreign Affairs Committee, said in a statement posted to X on Tuesday. “Republicans now face a clear choice: go on the record and join Democrats in ending these cost-raising tariffs, or keep forcing American families to pay for them.”

The vote on Trump’s tariffs forced House Republicans to choose between loyalty to the president and striking down economic policy that many in the GOP conference do not like.

Read more: https://www.cnbc.com/2026/02/11/gop-trump-tariffs-canada.html



REFERENCE - https://www.democraticunderground.com/10143614601
11 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

mdbl

(8,325 posts)
1. What is with the idiot from Maine? Aren't they a border state?
Wed Feb 11, 2026, 06:40 PM
17 hrs ago

I guess he wants his state to continue to lose Canadian visitors.

mahina

(20,550 posts)
2. Maybe he's responding to some muscle
Wed Feb 11, 2026, 06:43 PM
17 hrs ago

He’s the one that already said he wasn’t coming back right?

Though my Mom would say that that’s just ʻpure speculationʻ

the nelm

(253 posts)
9. You're right. He is an idiot. He represents Maine's 2nd district which represents the...
Wed Feb 11, 2026, 09:07 PM
15 hrs ago

northern 2/3rds of the state. That district is purple at best. I always found him as a trying to play both sides type. Collins is from that district as well, though as Senator she supposedly represents the whole state. I grew up in that part of that state but haven't lived there for most of my life.

Polybius

(21,648 posts)
7. Tariffs don't have to be a partisan thing
Wed Feb 11, 2026, 08:08 PM
16 hrs ago

Former House Majority Leader Dick Gephardt was a big tariff supporter.

Buddyzbuddy

(2,337 posts)
4. I looking forward to the Smurf being assigned to a closet in the next term.
Wed Feb 11, 2026, 07:05 PM
17 hrs ago

I know it won't happen, we're too gentile.
The basement with his friggin red stapler would do just fine. Or a boiler room with no windows.

70sEraVet

(5,367 posts)
5. I have one suggestion concerning that article:
Wed Feb 11, 2026, 07:40 PM
16 hrs ago

It should read, "forced House Republicans to choose between loyalty to the president AND LOYALTY TO THE US CONSTITUTION!"

BumRushDaShow

(167,376 posts)
8. The article is correct because
Wed Feb 11, 2026, 08:13 PM
16 hrs ago

the GOP has done NOTHING to uphold the Constitution and has in essence, ditched Article I (which is THEIR BRANCH) to promote the "Unitary Executive" and elevate Article II. And their Constitutional disdain includes attacking the Article III Judicial Branch (threatening impeachments of judges and other retaliatory investigations) and sticking it to the states by ignoring the 10th Amendment.

reACTIONary

(7,072 posts)
11. No, it is not veto proof, and....
Wed Feb 11, 2026, 09:49 PM
14 hrs ago

.... it has to go to the senate. The senate has passed similar resolutions, but when it gets to tsf, it will be vetoed.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»House votes to override T...