Judge weighs Washington Post's demand for government to return devices seized from reporter's home

[BumRushDaShow]

Source: AP

Updated 6:06 PM EST, February 20, 2026


ALEXANDRIA, Va. (AP) — The federal government is asking a court to “run roughshod” over the First Amendment after seizing electronic devices from a Washington Post reporter’s Virginia home last month, an attorney for the newspaper argued Friday.

U.S. Magistrate Judge William Porter didn’t rule from the bench on the newspaper’s request for an order requiring authorities to return the devices taken from the Virginia home of Post reporter Hannah Natanson. Porter had authorized the search by FBI agents investigating allegations that a Pentagon contractor illegally leaked classified information to Natanson.

Porter said he intends to issue a decision before a follow-up hearing scheduled for March 4. “I have a pretty good sense of what I’m going to do here,” the magistrate said without elaborating.

Pentagon contractor Aurelio Luis Perez-Lugones was arrested on Jan. 8 and charged with unauthorized removal and retention of classified documents. Perez-Lugones is accused of taking home printouts of classified documents from his workplace and later passing them to Natanson.

Read more: https://apnews.com/article/fbi-washington-post-search-warrant-classified-documents-b94ca2098e653e50b1f8d448e205faa3

[Seinan Sensei]

1. Uhm ... "unauthorized removal and retention of classified documents"

Sounds familiar.
By any chance, were any of the documents found in Natanson‘s bathroom?

[Ocelot II]

2. A bit ironic that the Washington Post would complain about running roughshod over the 1st Amendment.

They've been doing that pretty effectively themselves.

[msongs]

3. so jeff could just call donald and get back the items in question. simple nt