Pentagon offers no evidence to support claim it attacked Iran in defense
Source: Politico
03/01/2026 04:26 PM EST Updated: 03/01/2026 04:52 PM EST
The Trump administration is making the case that it ordered expansive, deadly strikes to stop an imminent threat from Tehran, but is providing no evidence Iran had such plans.
The White House, amid the largest military buildup in the region in decades, has yet to explain to the public or to Congress what Iranian threat prompted the massive attacks that have upended the region and could draw the U.S. into another Middle East war.
The administration first tested out its justification more than 12 hours after the U.S. began bombarding Iran with missiles, drones and long-range artillery. A senior Trump administration official told reporters Saturday that the U.S. had determined American troops would have suffered far more casualties by waiting for an impending Iranian strike. In the same briefing, two other officials said the president ordered the strikes after he determined Iran would not agree to stop uranium enrichment altogether.
But the administrations efforts to construct a case for war only after the shots have started flying has few historical parallels. The Pentagon has held no briefings nearly 36 hours after the U.S. military strikes, bucking a practice of doing so after attacks that goes back to the Vietnam War. And unlike past presidents embarking on major military campaigns, Trump made little effort to drum up support from Congress, U.S. allies or the American people. The administration did not try to convince the Senate to authorize the war, as President George W. Bush did in Iraq, or plead to the United Nations, as George H.W. Bush did to build a coalition against Saddam Husseins attack on Kuwait.
Read more: https://www.politico.com/news/2026/03/01/trump-iran-preparing-attack-no-evidence-00806447
wcmagumba
(5,967 posts)NCDem47
(3,400 posts)"THEY'RE the agressors!"
Mister Ed
(6,899 posts)What's this world coming to, when a president can take us to war without even bothering to fake any evidence?
underpants
(195,906 posts)Parsi: I was an informal adviser to the Obama administration on the nuclear talks. This deal is much stronger than what Obama got. Under this deal, they would keep zerono stockpile at all. Trump had a massive win there. He could have declared victory. Instead, he chose to declare war.
Link to tweet
?s=46&t=3VBm1LJ8j8qLp6JTs_8J2A
menzmag
(24 posts)So how to stop their president? (If they want to)
underpants
(195,906 posts)Link to tweet
?s=46&t=3VBm1LJ8j8qLp6JTs_8J2A