Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

LetMyPeopleVote

(183,354 posts)
Fri Jun 12, 2026, 01:44 PM 13 hrs ago

Judge rejects legal effort to cancel White House's UFC event

Source: ABC

The White House can host an Ultimate Fighting Championship event on the South Lawn this weekend, a federal judge ruled on Friday.

U.S. District Judge Amit Mehta rejected a request to block the high-profile event brought by two Virginia residents who alleged the Trump administration's authorization for the event was unlawful.

In his order, Judge Mehta determined that the plaintiffs failed "to establish both a substantial likelihood of standing and irreparable harm" in their lawsuit against the event.

The lawsuit alleged the event -- which includes a press conference at the Lincoln Memorial on Friday, ceremonial weigh-in and concert at the Ellipse on Saturday, and the South Lawn fight on Sunday -- violated National Park Service regulations, was improperly permitted, and lacked a necessary environmental review.

In his order, Judge Mehta found neither plaintiff was able to show they are "directly affected" by the event, despite their contentions that the temporary arena known as the "Claw" is "hideous" and "grotesque," and that it diminishes their ability to enjoy the beauty of the nation's capital in the coming days.

Read more: https://abcnews.com/US/judge-rejects-legal-effort-cancel-white-houses-ufc/story



The judge found no standing. This is not a surprise

14 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Judge rejects legal effort to cancel White House's UFC event (Original Post) LetMyPeopleVote 13 hrs ago OP
Was just getting ready to post BumRushDaShow 13 hrs ago #1
Hey, that was going to be my line! mahatmakanejeeves 13 hrs ago #3
LOL BumRushDaShow 12 hrs ago #9
Come on, DC pigeons... start preparing! 50 Shades Of Blue 13 hrs ago #2
Get it dweller 13 hrs ago #4
Don't see what the point would be. Igel 12 hrs ago #7
Too bad the Park Service can't sue their own administration. pat_k 12 hrs ago #11
Maybe the wind-gods will swoop down and carry the "Claw" to Maga Lardo. Talitha 13 hrs ago #5
Well It's Time wcollar 12 hrs ago #6
The property does not belong to him BettyBlueDot 12 hrs ago #8
He used the WH...and the lawn to fund raise in 2020 on July 4th Bengus81 12 hrs ago #12
Well, it doesn't belong to just you or me either. Which is why the plaintiffs lacked standing onenote 11 hrs ago #13
Go for the heat,stay for the bugs Bengus81 12 hrs ago #10
well, just damn markie 11 hrs ago #14

Igel

(37,656 posts)
7. Don't see what the point would be.
Fri Jun 12, 2026, 02:33 PM
12 hrs ago

The judge explained the basis, and appointed by Obama I doubt he's a hard-core Trumper.

Making it impossible to enjoy the view would make anybody able to stop anything they thought unpleasant. Don't like that protest permit? Hey, it impairs the view.

Don't like having traffic re-routed briefly? So much for that parade.

(Provided it's a federal issue and not a state issue, but then again maybe a lot of the 'argumentation' would percolate on down.)

Talitha

(8,177 posts)
5. Maybe the wind-gods will swoop down and carry the "Claw" to Maga Lardo.
Fri Jun 12, 2026, 02:02 PM
13 hrs ago

And take lard-ass with it.

Hopefully it will be unbearably hot and miserable.
Let 'em all sit and stew in their own juice for a few hours.

BettyBlueDot

(35 posts)
8. The property does not belong to him
Fri Jun 12, 2026, 02:43 PM
12 hrs ago

My disgust is that he is using OUR property for personal profit. Without authorization. He may as well just come to my house, erect his "cage" on my front lawn, and collect his grift..... and I would hv no say????? I thought there were laws against using Federal property for personal gain.

Bengus81

(10,473 posts)
12. He used the WH...and the lawn to fund raise in 2020 on July 4th
Fri Jun 12, 2026, 02:54 PM
12 hrs ago

Never mind Covid was everywhere by then too.

onenote

(46,304 posts)
13. Well, it doesn't belong to just you or me either. Which is why the plaintiffs lacked standing
Fri Jun 12, 2026, 03:47 PM
11 hrs ago

Bengus81

(10,473 posts)
10. Go for the heat,stay for the bugs
Fri Jun 12, 2026, 02:52 PM
12 hrs ago

Have those billionaire buds of Trumps plunked down their millions for a seat as instructed?

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Judge rejects legal effor...