Meta Is Toying With the Idea of Smart Glasses That Record Everything, All the Time
Source: Gizmodo
Smart glasses ick people out for various reasons, and many have to do with cameras. In response to that ever-growing aversion, companies that make face computers with cameras on them have extended some small but helpful olive branches to people worried about privacy.
-snip-
In Meta's case, though, things may be swinging toward the polar opposite end of the spectrum. According to the Financial Times, Meta is testing prototype smart glasses that record literally everything, all the time. The so-called "super-sensing" glasses would reportedly capture photos "every few seconds," according to sources familiar with the matter who spoke to the Financial Times. The idea here is that Meta's AI glasses could act as a kind of always-on assistant and even remember things about your day like where you left your keys or specific things you said.
At the risk of stating the obvious, that would be a pretty significant escalation in how Meta's smart glasses currently work. Right now, in order to record your surroundings, you have to activate your glasses with your voice or the capture button on the glasses. Once you're taking a picture or a video, an LED indicator lights up on the front of the glasses to show the world that your camera is on.
The Financial Times reports that, with the super-sensing prototype being tested, there is no plan to light up the LED indicator when the glasses are taking photos of the wearer's surroundings. On top of that, there are divergent views within the company on whether the data collected by the glasses should be stored on Meta's servers and used to train its AI. One proposed iteration of super-sensing would collect metadata, but not store pictures themselves, which would be a bit more privacy-friendly but still far from perfect. Metadata in photos, for example, can often contain exact locations, device serial numbers, and more.
-snip-
Read more: https://gizmodo.com/meta-is-toying-with-the-idea-of-smart-glasses-that-record-everything-all-the-time-2000782893
This is not just Zuckerberg "toying with" using anyone dumb enough (or AI-addicted enough or perverted enough) to buy these "super sensing" glasses as mobile spies for Meta on everyone and everything around them. The Financial Times article - https://www.ft.com/content/ac282450-91a8-4597-8f60-9e6ef416865a - says Meta is currently testing a prototype.
And while Gizmodo says there is "no plan to light up the LED indicator" there in fact IS a plan, according to FT, and it is "not to activate the LED when the super-sensing features are being used." FT says their sources say that plan could change, but the current plan and intent is for Meta smart glasses to be spying on everyone and everything all the time.
And the software to do this will be downloaded to existing, already sold, Meta smart glasses.
Zuckerberg reportedly, according to FT, thinks these super sensing smart glasses will replace smartphones. FT quotes him as saying that he wants these glasses to be "a personal agent that's with you all day long, helping you remember things and achieve your goals."
And of course an agent that's also working for Meta and gathering data for Zuckerberg.
I've posted here before about Meta wanting to add a facial recognition feature to its smart glasses, creepy as that is, and in fact secretly downloading software for facial recognition to current smart glasses, without activating that software. That sneaky addition to the pervert glasses was spotted and the backlash caused Meta to remove the facial recognition software (supposedly).
But even if people wearing Meta smart glasses don't have access to facial recognition via AI, Meta will, and there's no reason to believe they won't use it.
Zuckerberg wants everyone who will buy Meta smart glasses to continually spy for him, without even an LED to let people know they're being recorded. Continuous audio recording, every second. Images recorded every few seconds.
EDITING to add that it's very likely Zuckerberg has already discussed the tremendous data-gathering potential of "super sensing" smart glasses with Trump and the Trump regime.
RussBLib
(10,872 posts)Sounds a bit dystopian to me, not to mention a constant invasion of privacy.
https://russblib.blogspot.com/?m=1
highplainsdem
(63,908 posts)Tasmanian Devil
(297 posts)Remember this news? Is Zuckerberg going to allow these glasses into his private and public life?
Mark Zuckerberg Puts Tape Over His Webcam
highplainsdem
(63,908 posts)profit from all that data, whether using it on platforms they control, selling it to all sorts of advertisers, or selling it to governments or giving it to governments in exchange for favors.
jls4561
(3,355 posts)ExtraGriz
(550 posts)Maine has a 1 party law, while some states has a 2 party law.... it means in Maine we only need 1 party to record a phone conversation. Some states requires both or all parties in the conversation to give consent.
I'm not sure if people with these glasses need consent in 2 party states before recording videos and audios....???
jmowreader
(53,589 posts)...is that your sensitive data will be on the Dark Web LONG before you can get The Law in there to haul the perp who stole your data off.
johnnyfins
(4,192 posts)More of a window into your private life than they already have, I have zero sympathy for you. All areas of your life will be exploited.
Raftergirl
(1,990 posts)Skittles
(173,883 posts)Raftergirl
(1,990 posts)Karasu
(2,429 posts)Polybius
(22,347 posts)Skittles
(173,883 posts)UGH
hamsterjill
(18,048 posts)The Circle with Tom Hanks and Emma Watson, 2017.
purr-rat beauty
(1,726 posts)Imagine someone sneaking these in to record classified or sensitive info. People will try.
Baitball Blogger
(52,974 posts)jmowreader
(53,589 posts)...the White House Ballroom, Kennedy Center Defacement and Lincoln Memorial Reflecting Pool debacles will look like mild glitches compared to this?
Karasu
(2,429 posts)products or platforms outside of forced social media dependency. They've crossed so many red lines just over the last couple years that I can't stand to look at FB or IG posts anymore.
This country is beyond corrupt for allowing this shit to be commercially available or legal in the first place. The founders are rolling in their graves.
squiregeek
(20 posts)... because the rectum they will reside in if they get close me is reported to have no sunshine.
Wicked Blue
(9,115 posts)we could call them Smart Ass Glasses
Polybius
(22,347 posts)Meta is his company, Musk is rich enough lol.
Wicked Blue
(9,115 posts)twodogsbarking
(19,998 posts)in2herbs
(4,699 posts)use this infringement of their rights to sue Zuck.
jmowreader
(53,589 posts)You CAN, however, create an All New And Interesting Makeup Look and copyright that...which of course means that every single American regardless of gender or age will be walking around every day with their faces done.
RedWhiteBlueIsRacist
(2,466 posts)luv2fly
(2,807 posts)What's today's rationalization?
Bristlecone
(11,282 posts)a). Privacy invasion
b). They will have copyright infringement cases up the wazoo.
Think of just the movie pirating implications.
Luciferous
(6,654 posts)Grins
(9,630 posts)And who thought this was a good idea?
LudwigPastorius
(15,327 posts)He's been hard at work ever since trying to make that happen.
fujiyamasan
(2,233 posts)This is another desperate attempt by Zuck to act like he has a strategy to actually grow his company, and to prop up his stock price and create some buzz. The problem is no one is buying either.
Seriously, he lost over $80B on that stupid metaverse thing. Hes spending hundreds of billions on capex, and they dont know what to do with all that compute, so theyre renting some of it out. Maybe the rest would be used for something like this, which would take a mind blowing amount of money (storage, memory, compute). They would never be able to profit off this. There just isnt enough of a market to monetize this. Hes just throwing more shit at the wall.
Smart glasses appear dead. Google initially tried this over ten years ago. If a company is going to succeed with a product like this, it would be Apple, but aside from the Vision Pro (which also hasnt sold that well) Im not seeing much from them. Theyre also incredibly smart in not spending nearly as much as the others on AI, and in recent weeks as the market is growing more worried, Apple is really benefiting, and the stock reflects that.