Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

mahatmakanejeeves

(64,419 posts)
Fri Jan 31, 2025, 01:20 PM Jan 31

Trump maligns trans service members, diversity, learning in discriminatory EOs

Hat tip, the DUer who is consistently praising LawDork

Trump maligns trans service members, diversity, learning in discriminatory EOs
Just some of Trump's final moves in a day apparently aimed at wrecking American government and harming those who rely on federal grants or foreign aid.

Chris Geidner
Jan 28, 2025

On Monday evening, President Donald Trump took direct aim at nondiscrimination and diversity in the military in a pair of executive orders that include a discriminatory provision declaring transgender people unfit for military service. ... Both orders have names that have nothing to do with what they seek to do, so I will note their formal names just once. ... In the first order, named “Prioritizing Military Readiness and Excellence,” what Trump did was discriminate against trans people.

Following last week’s anti-trans order defining “sex” for the federal government, this week’s anti-trans order applies those definitions of “sex” to the military-specific order and then goes disturbingly further, declaring that “adoption of a gender identity inconsistent with an individual's sex conflicts with a soldier's commitment to an honorable, truthful, and disciplined lifestyle, even in one's personal life.”

It is a horrifying statement of dehumanization that should be condemned by all:

Consistent with the military mission and longstanding DoD policy, expressing a false “gender identity” divergent from an individual’s sex cannot satisfy the rigorous standards necessary for military service. Beyond the hormonal and surgical medical interventions involved, adoption of a gender identity inconsistent with an individual’s sex conflicts with a soldier’s commitment to an honorable, truthful, and disciplined lifestyle, even in one’s personal life. A man’s assertion that he is a woman, and his requirement that others honor this falsehood, is not consistent with the humility and selflessness required of a service member.

The executive order then has a “policy” section that declares “individuals with gender dysphoria” — the medical diagnosis associated with treatment for transgender people — have too many “medical, surgical, and mental health constraints“ to meet the “high standards for troop readiness, lethality, cohesion, honesty, humility, uniformity, and integrity.”

It’s appalling.

{snip}
1 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Trump maligns trans service members, diversity, learning in discriminatory EOs (Original Post) mahatmakanejeeves Jan 31 OP
If "gender dysphoria" is a disability, how is it justifiable to discriminate Ocelot II Jan 31 #1

Ocelot II

(124,345 posts)
1. If "gender dysphoria" is a disability, how is it justifiable to discriminate
Fri Jan 31, 2025, 01:28 PM
Jan 31

against people with that disability in contexts other than the military? This EO claims people with gender dysphoria are medically disqualified for military service (that's nonsense, but that's another issue), but what about other situations? We have laws prohibiting disability discrimination and requiring reasonable accommodation for people with disabilities, so why wouldn't this determination apply elsewhere? I understand that trans people wouldn't want to be regarded as "disabled" or ill, and they shouldn't be, but why not turn this stupid argument around against the discriminators?

Latest Discussions»Editorials & Other Articles»Trump maligns trans servi...