Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin

(121,998 posts)
Wed Feb 19, 2025, 03:40 PM Feb 19

A New York lesson on our choices as collective hostages

By M. Gessen / The New York Times

“I expect you will eventually find someone who is enough of a fool, or enough of a coward, to file your motion,” wrote Hagan Scotten, the assistant U.S. attorney in the Southern District of New York, to Emil Bove, the acting deputy attorney general, in a resignation letter that became public Friday. This made Scotten the seventh legal official in less than 24 hours to resign in response to Bove’s order that corruption charges against Mayor Eric Adams of New York be dropped.

By Friday evening, Bove clearly had found people who agreed to do the deed. In court filings Friday evening, Edward Sullivan, along with Bove and Antoinette Bacon, asked a judge to withdraw the case. Reuters reported that Sullivan had volunteered in order “to spare other career staff from potentially being fired for refusing to do so.”

Sullivan came forward after Justice Department leadership called the entire public integrity section into a meeting in search of someone who would sign a court document to withdraw the charges; within one hour, according to The New York Times and law professor and journalist Barbara McQuade.

In a column published last weekend, I mentioned the concept of collective hostage-taking, pioneered by Russian sociologist Yuri Levada. He spent decades trying to understand the methods of enforcement used by totalitarian regimes and the accommodations people make in response. He identified collective hostage-taking as one of the most important totalitarian tools. It functions by enforcing collective responsibility and threatening collective punishment. In Josef Stalin’s time, if people were arrested for a (usually invented) political crime, suspicion would also fall on their family members, their co-workers and their children’s schoolteachers and classmates. In later Soviet years, if dissidents were arrested, their colleagues would be scrutinized; some could lose their jobs or be demoted for “failing to exercise sufficient vigilance.” It is remarkable that Bove, if the reports are accurate, enacted collective hostage-taking literally, by putting attorneys in a room and tasking them — over a video call — with finding at least one person to take the fall.

https://www.heraldnet.com/opinion/gesen-a-new-york-lesson-on-our-choices-as-collective-hostages/

Latest Discussions»Editorials & Other Articles»A New York lesson on our ...